Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Insufficient data to determine institutional momentum.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $2.43 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 27.6%/yr for a decade (off $61M normalized FCF).
The market's 27.6% is more optimistic than its 6-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.15B shares · net debt $4.8B
mean -35.5% · volatility σ 80% · implied rate exceeded in 1/5 yrs
Central path = implied 27.6%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (80%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 | FY2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.86B 100.0% | $3.85B 100.0% | $3.75B 100.0% | $3.91B 100.0% | $3.56B 100.0% | $2.95B 100.0% | $3.61B 100.0% | $3.59B 100.0% | $6.25B 100.0% | $6.24B 100.0% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $1.69B 43.7% | $1.69B 43.9% | $1.66B 44.2% | $1.59B 40.7% | $1.52B 42.7% | $1.40B 47.3% | $1.35B 37.4% | $1.35B 37.5% | $1.73B 27.6% | $1.70B 27.3% |
| Total Operating Expenses | — | — | $3.05B 81.4% | $2.96B 75.7% | $2.75B 77.2% | $2.41B 81.7% | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Income | -$20.6M -0.5% | -$763.1M -19.8% | -$797.3M -21.3% | $56.9M 1.5% | $154.9M 4.4% | -$1.74B -58.9% | $690.1M 19.1% | $700.8M 19.5% | $1.50B 24.0% | $1.15B 18.4% |
| Interest Expense | — | — | — | — | — | — | $722.9M 20.0% | $1.86B 52.0% | $1.85B 29.6% | $1.81B 28.9% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $1.1M 0.0% | -$926K -0.0% | -$655K -0.0% | -$2.3M -0.1% | -$3.4M -0.1% | -$7.8M -0.3% | -$23.0M -0.6% | -$43.9M -1.2% | -$86.0M -1.4% | $13.1M 0.2% |
| Pretax Income | -$473.7M -12.3% | -$1.17B -30.3% | -$1.16B -31.0% | — | -$150.0M -4.2% | -$2.10B -71.2% | -$24.1M -0.7% | -$833.2M -23.2% | -$296.2M -4.7% | -$650.7M -10.4% |
| Income Tax Expense | -$1.8M -0.0% | -$158.4M -4.1% | -$62.3M -1.7% | $4.7M 0.1% | $8.4M 0.2% | -$183.6M -6.2% | $13.8M 0.4% | -$177.2M -4.9% | -$49.6M -0.8% | $87.0M 1.4% |
| Net Income | -$472.9M -12.2% | -$1.01B -26.2% | -$1.10B -29.4% | -$264.7M -6.8% | -$159.2M -4.5% | -$1.91B -64.9% | -$201.9M -5.6% | -$398.1M -11.1% | -$302.1M -4.8% | -$754.8M -12.1% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-3.06 | $-6.68 | $-7.39 | $-1.79 | $-1.09 | $-13.12 | $-2.36 | $-4.68 | $-3.57 | $-8.96 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-3.06 | $-6.68 | $-7.39 | $-1.79 | $-1.09 | $-13.12 | $-2.36 | $-4.68 | $-3.57 | $-8.96 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 154.3M | 151.3M | 149.3M | 148.1M | 146.7M | 146.0M | 85.4M | 85.0M | 84.6M | 84.3M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 154.3M | 151.3M | 149.3M | 148.1M | 146.7M | 146.0M | 85.4M | 85.0M | 84.6M | 84.3M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
4/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on $11M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -15%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $271M covers the $73M due within a year 3.7× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-12-31 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~4.7% on $15.2B of debt. Interest last disclosed in FY2018 (no longer broken out).
Cash of $271M fully covers short-term debt of $73M.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
No trend data available for this metric.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 192 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOOG | $4.10T | 31.4× | 27.4× | 10.2× | 15.1% | 59.7% | 32.8% | 31.8% | 28.5% | 0.3× | 4,874 |
| META | $1.70T | 28.7× | 16.9× | 8.4× | 22.2% | 82.0% | 30.1% | 27.8% | 21.9% | 0.6× | 4,839 |
| AMX | $1.40T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 318 |
| CHT | $350.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 206 |
| NFLX | $322.6B | 30.2× | 24.0× | 7.1× | 15.9% | 48.5% | 24.3% | 41.3% | 26.7% | 1.1× | 3,458 |
| CCZ | $239.2B | 12.0× | 6.4× | 1.9× | -0.0% | — | 16.2% | 20.6% | 19.4% | 0.2× | 1 |
| VZ | $210.3B | 12.3× | 4.3× | 1.5× | 2.5% | — | 12.4% | 16.2% | 16.2% | 0.0× | 3,122 |
| DIS | $203.3B | 15.6× | 10.5× | 2.1× | 3.4% | — | 13.1% | 11.3% | 8.2% | 1.8× | 2,883 |
| TMUS | $195.1B | 18.1× | 8.7× | 2.2× | 8.5% | — | 12.4% | 18.6% | 7.6% | 2.7× | 1,648 |
| T | $185.4B | 8.5× | 6.9× | 1.5× | 2.7% | — | 17.5% | 17.4% | 8.1% | 3.2× | 2,848 |
| VEON | $126.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 97 |
| DASH | $84.0B | 92.4× | 54.2× | 6.1× | 27.9% | — | 6.8% | 9.3% | 9.3% | — | 973 |
| WBD | $69.6B | 96.8× | 15.2× | 1.9× | -5.1% | — | 1.9% | 2.0% | 1.1% | 5.1× | 1,259 |
| EA | $52.6B | 59.7× | 36.1× | 7.0× | 0.9% | 79.0% | 11.8% | 13.1% | 13.1% | — | 998 |
| LYV | $40.3B | — | 25.5× | 1.6× | 8.8% | — | 2.0% | 183% | 5.9% | 5.0× | 779 |
| TTWO | $39.3B | — | 426.8× | 5.9× | 18.2% | 57.2% | -4.5% | -8.5% | -4.9% | 26.7× | 1,011 |
| TWLO | $36.4B | 1137.5× | 103.9× | 7.2× | 13.7% | 48.9% | 0.7% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 2.8× | 776 |
| RDDT | $29.4B | 60.1× | 62.1× | 13.3× | 69.4% | 91.2% | 24.1% | 18.1% | 18.1% | — | 765 |
| FOX | $27.3B | 12.1× | — | 1.7× | 16.6% | — | 14.1% | 19.2% | 12.4% | — | 505 |
| OMC | $24.8B | — | 57.9× | 1.4× | 10.1% | 8.5% | -0.3% | -0.5% | -0.3% | 15.8× | 1,083 |
| ROKU | $22.9B | 262.9× | 534.0× | 4.8× | 15.2% | 43.8% | 1.9% | 3.3% | 3.3% | — | 665 |
| FWONA | $21.9B | — | 40.0× | 4.9× | 22.7% | — | 12.4% | 7.2% | 4.3% | 7.9× | 283 |
| NWS | $19.0B | 16.1× | — | 2.3× | 2.4% | — | 14.0% | 13.4% | 11.0% | — | 304 |
| CHTR | $18.2B | 3.7× | 5.4× | 0.3× | -0.6% | — | 9.1% | 31.1% | 4.5% | 4.5× | 760 |
| TKO | $15.6B | 85.2× | 14.0× | 3.3× | -3.1% | — | 4.1% | 5.2% | 2.6% | 2.9× | 616 |
| IHRT | $393M | — | 15.3× | 0.1× | 0.3% | — | -12.2% | 25.9% | -14.7% | 14.9× | 130 |
Peers = companies sharing IHRT's sector (Communication Services) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Where each multiple sits in its own 6-yr range · 42th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 6-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Operating leverage needs meaningful revenue change.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2017 | FY2018 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SG&A | 37.5 | 37.4 | 47.3 | 42.7 | 40.7 | 44.2 | 43.9 | 43.7 |
| Operating Income | 19.5 | 19.1 | -58.9 | 4.4 | 1.5 | -21.3 | -19.8 | -0.5 |
| Income Tax | -4.9 | 0.4 | -6.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | -1.7 | -4.1 | -0.0 |
| Net Income | -11.1 | -5.6 | -64.9 | -4.5 | -6.8 | -29.4 | -26.2 | -12.2 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on IHRT: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.