Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Strong institutional accumulation: ownership increased +6.58% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $10.80 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 5.2%/yr for a decade (off $8M normalized FCF).
The market's 5.2% is more optimistic than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.01B shares · net debt -$7M
mean 13.2% · volatility σ 165% · implied rate exceeded in 4/7 yrs
Central path = implied 5.2%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (165%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on $6M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -2%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $14M covers the $5M due within a year 2.7× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2022-09-30 (10-Q).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~6.0% on $7M of debt.
Cash of $14M fully covers short-term debt of $6M.
Mostly short-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-18
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $113.8M 100.0% | $130.7M 100.0% | $123.3M 100.0% | $116.8M 100.0% | $84.9M 100.0% | $53.8M 100.0% | $60.7M 100.0% | $78.6M 100.0% | $66.8M 100.0% | $40.2M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $64.9M 57.0% | $75.3M 57.6% | $66.3M 53.8% | $63.4M 54.3% | $43.7M 51.4% | $29.7M 55.2% | $31.4M 51.8% | $39.2M 49.8% | $32.1M 48.1% | $19.8M 49.3% |
| Gross Profit | $48.9M 43.0% | $55.4M 42.4% | $57.0M 46.2% | $53.4M 45.7% | $41.2M 48.6% | $24.1M 44.8% | $29.2M 48.2% | $39.4M 50.2% | $34.7M 51.9% | $20.4M 50.7% |
| Research & Development | $9.4M 8.3% | $8.5M 6.5% | $7.6M 6.2% | $7.5M 6.4% | $5.5M 6.5% | $5.1M 9.4% | $5.0M 8.2% | $4.9M 6.2% | $4.3M 6.4% | $3.7M 9.1% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $22.2M 19.5% | $23.6M 18.0% | $21.3M 17.3% | $19.3M 16.5% | $15.9M 18.7% | $11.4M 21.3% | $13.0M 21.5% | $12.8M 16.3% | $11.7M 17.5% | $7.0M 17.4% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $52.6M 46.3% | $52.0M 39.8% | $46.5M 37.7% | $42.7M 36.6% | $32.8M 38.6% | $25.3M 47.0% | $26.7M 44.0% | $34.2M 43.6% | $31.1M 46.5% | $16.2M 40.4% |
| Operating Income | -$3.7M -3.3% | $3.4M 2.6% | $10.4M 8.5% | $10.7M 9.2% | $8.5M 10.0% | -$1.2M -2.3% | $2.5M 4.2% | $5.2M 6.6% | $3.6M 5.4% | $4.1M 10.3% |
| Interest Expense | $450K 0.4% | $846K 0.6% | $679K 0.6% | $635K 0.5% | $89K 0.1% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $953K 0.8% | $906K 0.7% | $1.3M 1.0% | $59K 0.1% | -$57K -0.1% | -$14K -0.0% | $55K 0.1% | -$137K -0.2% | $227K 0.3% | $61K 0.2% |
| Pretax Income | -$3.2M -2.8% | $3.5M 2.6% | $11.0M 9.0% | $10.1M 8.7% | $8.4M 9.9% | -$1.2M -2.3% | $2.6M 4.3% | $5.0M 6.4% | $3.8M 5.7% | $4.2M 10.5% |
| Income Tax Expense | -$695K -0.6% | $563K 0.4% | $1.7M 1.4% | $1.7M 1.4% | $1.1M 1.3% | -$336K -0.6% | $282K 0.5% | $2.0M 2.6% | $2.9M 4.3% | $1.5M 3.9% |
| Net Income | -$2.5M -2.2% | $2.9M 2.2% | $9.3M 7.6% | $8.5M 7.2% | $7.3M 8.6% | -$895K -1.7% | $2.3M 3.8% | $3.0M 3.9% | $975K 1.5% | $2.7M 6.6% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-0.21 | $0.24 | $0.82 | $0.79 | $0.70 | $-0.09 | $0.22 | $0.29 | $0.09 | $0.26 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-0.21 | $0.24 | $0.79 | $0.78 | $0.68 | $-0.09 | $0.22 | $0.29 | $0.09 | $0.26 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 12.2M | 12.2M | 11.5M | 10.7M | 10.5M | 10.3M | 10.4M | 10.3M | 10.3M | 10.3M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 12.2M | 12.2M | 11.8M | 10.9M | 10.7M | 10.3M | 10.4M | 10.4M | 10.3M | 10.3M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-18
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 74th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 16.3× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 49.8 | 51.8 | 55.2 | 51.4 | 54.3 | 53.8 | 57.6 | 57.0 |
| Gross Profit | 50.2 | 48.2 | 44.8 | 48.6 | 45.7 | 46.2 | 42.4 | 43.0 |
| R&D | 6.2 | 8.2 | 9.4 | 6.5 | 6.4 | 6.2 | 6.5 | 8.3 |
| SG&A | 16.3 | 21.5 | 21.3 | 18.7 | 16.5 | 17.3 | 18.0 | 19.5 |
| Operating Income | 6.6 | 4.2 | -2.3 | 10.0 | 9.2 | 8.5 | 2.6 | -3.3 |
| Income Tax | 2.6 | 0.5 | -0.6 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 0.4 | -0.6 |
| Net Income | 3.9 | 3.8 | -1.7 | 8.6 | 7.2 | 7.6 | 2.2 | -2.2 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on INTT: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Ranked against 743 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSM | $11.27T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,121 |
| NVDA | $5.40T | 45.4× | 40.5× | 25.0× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.97T | 45.1× | 34.7× | 11.9× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 68.1% | 0.6× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.67T | 27.5× | 19.4× | 11.1× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 27.7% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.70T | 75.0× | 66.9× | 26.5× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.14T | 133.8× | 63.0× | 30.5× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $912.5B | 211.3× | 215.9× | 26.3× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| INTC | $542.3B | — | 67.3× | 10.3× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $433.7B | 43.0× | 36.4× | 7.7× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| PLTR | $424.8B | 282.0× | 294.0× | 94.9× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| DELL | $370.4B | 65.4× | 34.9× | 3.3× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| LRCX | $365.5B | 69.4× | 58.4× | 19.8× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 37.4% | 0.7× | 2,500 |
| AMAT | $352.5B | 51.3× | 40.5× | 12.4× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| RPAY | $340.5B | — | — | 1101.1× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -28.2% | -1.7× | 142 |
| UMC | $309.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| ARM | $293.3B | 324.3× | 252.8× | 59.6× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| SNDK | $261.6B | — | — | 35.6× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.8% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| SAP | $257.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 794 |
| ANET | $250.5B | 72.5× | 63.3× | 27.8× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 39.0% | 28.4% | 28.4% | — | 1,930 |
| PANW | $242.9B | 227.2× | 151.7× | 26.3× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| TXN | $242.4B | 48.9× | 31.9× | 13.7× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.5% | 1.8× | 2,345 |
| CRM | $221.0B | 30.5× | 23.9× | 5.3× | 9.6% | 77.7% | 18.0% | 12.6% | 10.1% | 1.5× | 2,547 |
| IBM | $215.1B | 20.6× | — | 3.2× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| MRVL | $207.0B | 79.6× | 135.2× | 25.3× | 42.1% | 51.0% | 32.6% | 18.7% | 14.2% | 2.9× | 1,477 |
| QCOM | $190.9B | 35.5× | 14.3× | 4.3× | 13.7% | 55.4% | 12.5% | 26.1% | 15.4% | 1.1× | 2,611 |
| INTT | $135M | — | 41.7× | 1.2× | -12.9% | 43.0% | -2.2% | -2.4% | -2.3% | 2.4× | 71 |
Peers = companies sharing INTT's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.