Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional ownership roughly stable: +0.31% change quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
This company doesn't have positive free cash flow, so a reverse DCF can't be run.
Top 30 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $86.2M 100.0% | $83.8M 100.0% | $73.9M 100.0% | $75.6M 100.0% | $59.8M 100.0% | $44.6M 100.0% | $61.5M 100.0% | $73.3M 100.0% | $79.6M 100.0% | $71.5M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $22.0M 25.5% | $12.0M 14.4% | $10.5M 14.2% | $30.2M 40.0% | $15.9M 26.6% | $8.3M 18.6% | $22.7M 36.9% | $29.9M 40.8% | $36.7M 46.1% | $21.4M 29.9% |
| Gross Profit | $64.2M 74.5% | $71.8M 85.6% | $63.4M 85.8% | $45.4M 60.0% | $43.9M 73.4% | $36.3M 81.4% | $38.8M 63.1% | $43.4M 59.2% | $42.9M 53.9% | $50.2M 70.1% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $6.9M 8.0% | $5.5M 6.6% | $8.1M 10.9% | $8.6M 11.4% | $7.2M 12.0% | $7.6M 17.1% | $8.7M 14.1% | $8.5M 11.6% | $8.3M 10.5% | $5.0M 7.0% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $70.9M 82.3% | $77.3M 92.2% | $73.8M 99.9% | $58.0M 76.7% | $51.7M 86.4% | $44.4M 99.4% | $46.6M 75.7% | $48.9M 66.7% | $47.1M 59.2% | $51.0M 71.3% |
| Operating Income | -$6.7M -7.8% | -$5.5M -6.6% | -$10.4M -14.1% | -$12.6M -16.7% | -$7.8M -13.0% | -$8.0M -18.0% | -$7.7M -12.6% | -$5.5M -7.5% | -$4.2M -5.3% | -$857K -1.2% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | — | — | $15K 0.0% | -$436K -0.6% | $257K 0.4% | $998K 2.2% | $3.4M 5.5% | $0 0.0% | -$318K -0.4% | -$100K -0.1% |
| Pretax Income | — | -$5.8M -6.9% | -$10.4M -14.1% | — | — | -$7.3M -16.4% | -$4.8M -7.8% | -$5.9M -8.0% | -$4.6M -5.7% | -$957K -1.3% |
| Income Tax Expense | $11K 0.0% | $8K 0.0% | -$18K -0.0% | $0 0.0% | — | $0 0.0% | -$334K -0.5% | $0 0.0% | -$1.5M -1.9% | -$29K -0.0% |
| Net Income | -$5.1M -5.9% | -$5.8M -6.9% | -$10.4M -14.1% | -$13.1M -17.3% | -$7.6M -12.7% | -$7.3M -16.4% | -$4.5M -7.3% | -$5.9M -8.0% | -$3.1M -3.8% | -$773K -1.1% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | — | — | — | $-0.11 | $-0.06 | $-0.09 | $-0.11 | $-0.19 | $-0.11 | $-0.03 |
| EPS (Diluted) | — | $-0.04 | $-0.08 | $-0.11 | $-0.06 | $-0.09 | $-0.11 | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 14.5M | 14.0M | 131.1M | 119.8M | 117.6M | 77.5M | 40.5M | 31.0M | 28.2M | 24.7M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 14.5M | 14.0M | 131.1M | 119.8M | 117.6M | 77.5M | 40.5M | 31.0M | 28.2M | 24.7M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
2/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on -$3M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Insufficient data. Current ROIC on all capital: -51%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
$333333 of principal comes due within a year. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2012-09-30 (10-Q).
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.”
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Ranked against 192 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOOG | $4.10T | 31.4× | 27.4× | 10.2× | 15.1% | 59.7% | 32.8% | 31.8% | 28.5% | 0.3× | 4,874 |
| META | $1.70T | 28.7× | 16.9× | 8.4× | 22.2% | 82.0% | 30.1% | 27.8% | 21.9% | 0.6× | 4,839 |
| AMX | $1.40T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 318 |
| CHT | $350.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 206 |
| NFLX | $322.6B | 30.2× | 24.0× | 7.1× | 15.9% | 48.5% | 24.3% | 41.3% | 26.7% | 1.1× | 3,458 |
| CCZ | $239.2B | 12.0× | 6.4× | 1.9× | -0.0% | — | 16.2% | 20.6% | 19.4% | 0.2× | 1 |
| VZ | $210.3B | 12.3× | 4.3× | 1.5× | 2.5% | — | 12.4% | 16.2% | 16.2% | 0.0× | 3,122 |
| DIS | $203.3B | 15.6× | 10.5× | 2.1× | 3.4% | — | 13.1% | 11.3% | 8.2% | 1.8× | 2,883 |
| TMUS | $195.1B | 18.1× | 8.7× | 2.2× | 8.5% | — | 12.4% | 18.6% | 7.6% | 2.7× | 1,648 |
| T | $185.4B | 8.5× | 6.9× | 1.5× | 2.7% | — | 17.5% | 17.4% | 8.1% | 3.2× | 2,848 |
| VEON | $126.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 97 |
| DASH | $84.0B | 92.4× | 54.2× | 6.1× | 27.9% | — | 6.8% | 9.3% | 9.3% | — | 973 |
| WBD | $69.6B | 96.8× | 15.2× | 1.9× | -5.1% | — | 1.9% | 2.0% | 1.1% | 5.1× | 1,259 |
| EA | $52.6B | 59.7× | 36.1× | 7.0× | 0.9% | 79.0% | 11.8% | 13.1% | 13.1% | — | 998 |
| LYV | $40.3B | — | 25.5× | 1.6× | 8.8% | — | 2.0% | 183% | 5.9% | 5.0× | 779 |
| TTWO | $39.3B | — | 426.8× | 5.9× | 18.2% | 57.2% | -4.5% | -8.5% | -4.9% | 26.7× | 1,011 |
| TWLO | $36.4B | 1137.5× | 103.9× | 7.2× | 13.7% | 48.9% | 0.7% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 2.8× | 776 |
| RDDT | $29.4B | 60.1× | 62.1× | 13.3× | 69.4% | 91.2% | 24.1% | 18.1% | 18.1% | — | 765 |
| FOX | $27.3B | 12.1× | — | 1.7× | 16.6% | — | 14.1% | 19.2% | 12.4% | — | 505 |
| OMC | $24.8B | — | 57.9× | 1.4× | 10.1% | 8.5% | -0.3% | -0.5% | -0.3% | 15.8× | 1,083 |
| ROKU | $22.9B | 262.9× | 534.0× | 4.8× | 15.2% | 43.8% | 1.9% | 3.3% | 3.3% | — | 665 |
| FWONA | $21.9B | — | 40.0× | 4.9× | 22.7% | — | 12.4% | 7.2% | 4.3% | 7.9× | 283 |
| NWS | $19.0B | 16.1× | — | 2.3× | 2.4% | — | 14.0% | 13.4% | 11.0% | — | 304 |
| CHTR | $18.2B | 3.7× | 5.4× | 0.3× | -0.6% | — | 9.1% | 31.1% | 4.5% | 4.5× | 760 |
| TKO | $15.6B | 85.2× | 14.0× | 3.3× | -3.1% | — | 4.1% | 5.2% | 2.6% | 2.9× | 616 |
| INUV | $9M | — | — | 0.1× | 2.9% | 74.5% | -5.9% | -50.8% | -50.8% | — | 29 |
Peers = companies sharing INUV's sector (Communication Services) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 0th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 7.4× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 40.8 | 36.9 | 18.6 | 26.6 | 40.0 | 14.2 | 14.4 | 25.5 |
| Gross Profit | 59.2 | 63.1 | 81.4 | 73.4 | 60.0 | 85.8 | 85.6 | 74.5 |
| SG&A | 11.6 | 14.1 | 17.1 | 12.0 | 11.4 | 10.9 | 6.6 | 8.0 |
| Operating Income | -7.5 | -12.6 | -18.0 | -13.0 | -16.7 | -14.1 | -6.6 | -7.8 |
| Income Tax | 0.0 | -0.5 | 0.0 | — | 0.0 | -0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Net Income | -8.0 | -7.3 | -16.4 | -12.7 | -17.3 | -14.1 | -6.9 | -5.9 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on INUV: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.