Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 172 of 5,944 reporting institutions (90th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $51.66 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 3.2%/yr for a decade (off $63M normalized FCF).
The market's 3.2% is more conservative than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.02B shares · net debt -$108M
mean 26.2% · volatility σ 83% · implied rate exceeded in 5/9 yrs
Central path = implied 3.2%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (83%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-18
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $359.0M 100.0% | $336.3M 100.0% | $320.0M 100.0% | $293.1M 100.0% | $270.9M 100.0% | $245.6M 100.0% | $279.3M 100.0% | $253.3M 100.0% | $234.6M 100.0% | $199.6M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $180.4M 50.3% | $175.6M 52.2% | $166.8M 52.1% | $155.5M 53.1% | $143.0M 52.8% | $129.1M 52.6% | $148.8M 53.3% | $126.0M 49.7% | $115.3M 49.1% | $97.5M 48.9% |
| Gross Profit | $178.6M 49.7% | $160.6M 47.8% | $153.2M 47.9% | $137.6M 46.9% | $127.8M 47.2% | $116.5M 47.4% | $130.5M 46.7% | $127.3M 50.3% | $119.4M 50.9% | $102.0M 51.1% |
| Research & Development | $20.8M 5.8% | $18.1M 5.4% | $17.0M 5.3% | $16.8M 5.7% | $14.1M 5.2% | $12.8M 5.2% | $13.9M 5.0% | $6.2M 2.5% | $3.2M 1.3% | $2.9M 1.5% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $62.5M 17.4% | $56.2M 16.7% | $56.6M 17.7% | $48.7M 16.6% | $46.1M 17.0% | $49.7M 20.2% | $55.2M 19.7% | $47.7M 18.8% | $47.6M 20.3% | $40.2M 20.2% |
| Operating Income | $77.0M 21.5% | $71.2M 21.2% | $66.0M 20.6% | $58.8M 20.1% | $54.6M 20.2% | $27.8M 11.3% | $22.7M 8.1% | $62.4M 24.6% | $56.5M 24.1% | $48.0M 24.1% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$1.9M -0.5% | $80K 0.0% | -$1.6M -0.5% | -$5.9M -2.0% | -$5.5M -2.0% | $1.5M 0.6% | $576K 0.2% | $717K 0.3% | -$989K -0.4% | $2.1M 1.0% |
| Pretax Income | $74.9M 20.9% | $71.2M 21.2% | $64.4M 20.1% | $52.8M 18.0% | $49.0M 18.1% | $29.0M 11.8% | $23.2M 8.3% | $76.2M 30.1% | $55.5M 23.7% | $50.1M 25.1% |
| Income Tax Expense | $14.9M 4.1% | $14.6M 4.3% | $13.4M 4.2% | $12.7M 4.3% | $11.9M 4.4% | $10.9M 4.4% | $12.2M 4.4% | $17.3M 6.8% | $17.7M 7.5% | $14.9M 7.5% |
| Net Income | $58.0M 16.1% | $53.7M 16.0% | $48.1M 15.0% | $37.1M 12.7% | $34.3M 12.6% | $16.1M 6.6% | $6.9M 2.5% | $60.7M 24.0% | $43.8M 18.7% | $32.1M 16.1% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $2.92 | $2.70 | $2.41 | $1.82 | $1.65 | $0.77 | — | — | — | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | $2.92 | $2.70 | $2.41 | $1.82 | $1.65 | $0.77 | — | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 19.9M | 19.9M | 20.0M | 20.4M | 20.8M | 20.8M | — | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 19.9M | 19.9M | 20.0M | 20.4M | 20.8M | 20.8M | — | — | — | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 56% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $38M dividends + $0 buybacks = $38M returned on $67M FCF.
3 consecutive years of dividend increases · 11%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Insufficient data. Current ROIC on all capital: 27%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $108M covers all $71M of scheduled principal — no refinancing pressure. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2018-12-31 (20-F).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.”
Cash of $108M fully covers short-term debt of $0.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-18
Nothing notable to watch.
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 94th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Low operating leverage — profit tracks sales closely (stable, less cyclical).
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 49.7 | 53.3 | 52.6 | 52.8 | 53.1 | 52.1 | 52.2 | 50.3 |
| Gross Profit | 50.3 | 46.7 | 47.4 | 47.2 | 46.9 | 47.9 | 47.8 | 49.7 |
| R&D | 2.5 | 5.0 | 5.2 | 5.2 | 5.7 | 5.3 | 5.4 | 5.8 |
| SG&A | 18.8 | 19.7 | 20.2 | 17.0 | 16.6 | 17.7 | 16.7 | 17.4 |
| Operating Income | 24.6 | 8.1 | 11.3 | 20.2 | 20.1 | 20.6 | 21.2 | 21.5 |
| Income Tax | 6.8 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.1 |
| Net Income | 24.0 | 2.5 | 6.6 | 12.6 | 12.7 | 15.0 | 16.0 | 16.1 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on ITRN: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Ranked against 743 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSM | $11.27T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,121 |
| NVDA | $5.40T | 45.4× | 40.5× | 25.0× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.97T | 45.1× | 34.7× | 11.9× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 68.1% | 0.6× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.67T | 27.5× | 19.4× | 11.1× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 27.7% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.70T | 75.0× | 66.9× | 26.5× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.14T | 133.8× | 63.0× | 30.5× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $912.5B | 211.3× | 215.9× | 26.3× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| INTC | $542.3B | — | 67.3× | 10.3× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $433.7B | 43.0× | 36.4× | 7.7× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| PLTR | $424.8B | 282.0× | 294.0× | 94.9× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| DELL | $370.4B | 65.4× | 34.9× | 3.3× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| LRCX | $365.5B | 69.4× | 58.4× | 19.8× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 37.4% | 0.7× | 2,500 |
| AMAT | $352.5B | 51.3× | 40.5× | 12.4× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| RPAY | $340.5B | — | — | 1101.1× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -28.2% | -1.7× | 142 |
| UMC | $309.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| ARM | $293.3B | 324.3× | 252.8× | 59.6× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| SNDK | $261.6B | — | — | 35.6× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.8% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| SAP | $257.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 794 |
| ANET | $250.5B | 72.5× | 63.3× | 27.8× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 39.0% | 28.4% | 28.4% | — | 1,930 |
| PANW | $242.9B | 227.2× | 151.7× | 26.3× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| TXN | $242.4B | 48.9× | 31.9× | 13.7× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.5% | 1.8× | 2,345 |
| CRM | $221.0B | 30.5× | 23.9× | 5.3× | 9.6% | 77.7% | 18.0% | 12.6% | 10.1% | 1.5× | 2,547 |
| IBM | $215.1B | 20.6× | — | 3.2× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| MRVL | $207.0B | 79.6× | 135.2× | 25.3× | 42.1% | 51.0% | 32.6% | 18.7% | 14.2% | 2.9× | 1,477 |
| QCOM | $190.9B | 35.5× | 14.3× | 4.3× | 13.7% | 55.4% | 12.5% | 26.1% | 15.4% | 1.1× | 2,611 |
| ITRN | $1.0B | 17.7× | 10.1× | 2.9× | 6.8% | 49.7% | 16.1% | 26.6% | 26.6% | 0.0× | 172 |
Peers = companies sharing ITRN's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.