Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 353 of 5,944 reporting institutions (95th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $36.70 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 7.6%/yr for a decade (off $340M normalized FCF).
2-stage DCF · 0.13B shares · net debt $2.1B
mean 49.3% · volatility σ 96% · implied rate exceeded in 5/8 yrs
Central path = implied 7.6%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (96%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
6/7 of the 9 checks — 2 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 7 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
Free-cash-flow coverage unavailable. Last year: $84M dividends + $329M buybacks = $413M returned.
7 consecutive years of dividend increases · 8%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 10%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $500M covers all $43M of scheduled principal — no refinancing pressure. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2016-12-31 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Coverage is adequate but not comfortable. Effective rate ~6.1% on $2.6B of debt.
Cash of $500M fully covers short-term debt of $49M.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 651 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTM | $28.75T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 160 |
| CAT | $364.2B | 41.6× | 29.1× | 5.4× | 4.3% | 33.8% | 13.1% | 41.7% | 15.4% | 2.7× | 3,616 |
| GE | $328.2B | 38.4× | — | 7.2× | 18.5% | — | 19.0% | 46.6% | 22.2% | — | 3,077 |
| RTX | $264.2B | 39.7× | 18.8× | 3.0× | 9.7% | — | 7.6% | 10.3% | 10.3% | 0.0× | 3,277 |
| BA | $204.4B | 81.4× | 41.0× | 2.3× | 34.5% | 4.8% | 2.5% | 41.0% | 3.3% | 10.0× | 2,435 |
| DE | $181.0B | 36.2× | — | 4.0× | -11.7% | — | 11.0% | 19.4% | 12.6% | — | 2,491 |
| ABBNY | $174.3B | 47.1× | 31.1× | 5.4× | 9.5% | 34.8% | 11.9% | 28.5% | 20.4% | 0.9× | 48 |
| UNP | $166.7B | 23.4× | 16.0× | 6.8× | 1.1% | — | 29.1% | 38.7% | 14.2% | 2.6× | 2,648 |
| ETN | $154.3B | 38.1× | — | 5.6× | 10.3% | 37.6% | 14.9% | 21.0% | 13.9% | — | 2,398 |
| HON | $131.9B | 28.2× | 16.2× | 3.5× | 7.8% | 36.9% | 12.6% | 34.0% | 9.8% | 3.6× | 2,694 |
| LMT | $123.0B | 25.0× | 16.1× | 1.6× | 5.6% | 10.2% | 6.7% | 74.6% | 17.7% | 2.5× | 2,807 |
| PH | $117.9B | 33.9× | 26.6× | 5.9× | -0.4% | 36.9% | 17.8% | 25.8% | 16.7% | 1.6× | 1,845 |
| ADP | $108.7B | 25.0× | — | 5.0× | 6.7% | 46.4% | 20.1% | 73.2% | 40.1% | — | 2,179 |
| GD | $97.3B | 23.3× | 17.1× | 1.9× | 10.1% | — | 8.0% | 16.4% | 12.5% | 1.3× | 2,123 |
| TT | $94.0B | 32.5× | 23.2× | 4.4× | 7.5% | — | 13.7% | 34.0% | 22.1% | 1.1× | 1,658 |
| PWR | $92.6B | 91.1× | 46.0× | 3.3× | 20.3% | 15.0% | 3.6% | 11.5% | 10.6% | 0.4× | 1,659 |
| VRT | $91.6B | 70.2× | 43.4× | 8.9× | 27.7% | 36.3% | 13.0% | 33.8% | 19.4% | 1.4× | 1,748 |
| JCI | $91.6B | 27.9× | — | 3.9× | 2.8% | 36.4% | 13.9% | 25.5% | 14.4% | — | 1,487 |
| HWM | $91.5B | 61.4× | 40.3× | 11.1× | 11.1% | — | 18.3% | 28.2% | 17.9% | 1.3× | 1,399 |
| CSX | $89.1B | 31.1× | 14.4× | 6.3× | -3.1% | — | 20.5% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 1,791 |
| MMM | $86.2B | 27.1× | 16.6× | 3.5× | 1.5% | 39.9% | 13.0% | 69.1% | 18.8% | 2.1× | 2,051 |
| WM | $86.2B | 31.9× | 12.1× | 3.4× | 14.2% | 40.4% | 10.7% | 27.1% | 25.3% | 0.1× | 2,262 |
| UPS | $83.9B | 15.1× | 9.4× | 0.9× | -2.6% | — | 6.3% | 34.3% | 13.8% | 2.2× | 2,025 |
| EMR | $82.1B | 36.1× | — | 4.6× | 3.0% | 52.8% | 12.7% | 11.3% | 6.9% | — | 2,112 |
| CTAS | $80.4B | 45.3× | 28.9× | 7.8× | 7.7% | 50.0% | 17.5% | 38.7% | 25.5% | 0.8× | 1,366 |
| KBR | $4.6B | 11.4× | 8.1× | 0.6× | 1.0% | 14.8% | 5.3% | 27.6% | 10.1% | 3.1× | 353 |
Peers = companies sharing KBR's sector (Industrials) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2026
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.79B 100.0% | $7.71B 100.0% | $6.96B 100.0% | $6.56B 100.0% | $7.34B 100.0% | $5.77B 100.0% | $5.64B 100.0% | $4.91B 100.0% | $4.17B 100.0% | $4.27B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $6.64B 85.2% | $6.61B 85.7% | $5.98B 86.0% | $5.74B 87.4% | $6.53B 89.0% | $5.10B 88.5% | $4.99B 88.4% | $4.33B 88.1% | $3.73B 89.5% | $4.16B 97.4% |
| Cost of Services | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $3.83B 91.8% | $4.16B 97.4% |
| Gross Profit | $1.15B 14.8% | $1.10B 14.3% | $977.0M 14.0% | $828.0M 12.6% | $806.0M 11.0% | $666.0M 11.5% | $653.0M 11.6% | $584.0M 11.9% | $439.0M 10.5% | $112.0M 2.6% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $578.0M 7.4% | $543.0M 7.0% | $487.0M 7.0% | $420.0M 6.4% | $393.0M 5.4% | $335.0M 5.8% | $341.0M 6.0% | $294.0M 6.0% | $244.0M 5.8% | $133.0M 3.1% |
| Operating Income | $778.0M 10.0% | $659.0M 8.5% | $449.0M 6.5% | $343.0M 5.2% | $231.0M 3.1% | $57.0M 1.0% | $362.0M 6.4% | $468.0M 9.5% | $264.0M 6.3% | $19.0M 0.4% |
| Interest Expense | $158.0M 2.0% | $144.0M 1.9% | $115.0M 1.7% | $87.0M 1.3% | $80.0M 1.1% | $72.0M 1.2% | $99.0M 1.8% | $66.0M 1.3% | $21.0M 0.5% | $13.0M 0.3% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$6.0M -0.1% | -$7.0M -0.1% | -$5.0M -0.1% | $12.0M 0.2% | -$9.0M -0.1% | $1.0M 0.0% | $5.0M 0.1% | -$6.0M -0.1% | $4.0M 0.1% | $18.0M 0.4% |
| Pretax Income | $614.0M 7.9% | $508.0M 6.6% | -$165.0M -2.4% | $284.0M 4.3% | $146.0M 2.0% | -$14.0M -0.2% | $268.0M 4.8% | $396.0M 8.1% | $247.0M 5.9% | $24.0M 0.6% |
| Income Tax Expense | $156.0M 2.0% | $129.0M 1.7% | $95.0M 1.4% | $92.0M 1.4% | $111.0M 1.5% | $28.0M 0.5% | $59.0M 1.0% | $86.0M 1.8% | -$193.0M -4.6% | $84.0M 2.0% |
| Net Income | $415.0M 5.3% | $375.0M 4.9% | -$265.0M -3.8% | $190.0M 2.9% | $27.0M 0.4% | -$63.0M -1.1% | $202.0M 3.6% | $281.0M 5.7% | $432.0M 10.4% | -$70.0M -1.6% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $3.21 | $2.79 | $-1.96 | $1.36 | $0.19 | $-0.44 | $1.42 | $1.99 | $3.05 | $-0.49 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $3.21 | $2.79 | $-1.96 | $1.26 | $0.19 | $-0.44 | $1.41 | $1.99 | $3.05 | $-0.49 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 129.0M | 134.0M | 135.0M | 139.0M | 140.0M | 142.0M | 141.0M | 140.0M | 141.0M | 142.0M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 129.0M | 134.0M | 135.0M | 156.0M | 141.0M | 142.0M | 142.0M | 141.0M | 141.0M | 142.0M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Nothing notable to watch.
Where each multiple sits in its own 11-yr range · 58th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 11-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2026 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 18.3× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2025 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 88.1 | 88.4 | 88.5 | 89.0 | 87.4 | 86.0 | 85.7 | 85.2 |
| Gross Profit | 11.9 | 11.6 | 11.5 | 11.0 | 12.6 | 14.0 | 14.3 | 14.8 |
| SG&A | 6.0 | 6.0 | 5.8 | 5.4 | 6.4 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.4 |
| Operating Income | 9.5 | 6.4 | 1.0 | 3.1 | 5.2 | 6.5 | 8.5 | 10.0 |
| Income Tax | 1.8 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.7 | 2.0 |
| Net Income | 5.7 | 3.6 | -1.1 | 0.4 | 2.9 | -3.8 | 4.9 | 5.3 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on KBR: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.