Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional ownership roughly stable: +0.50% change quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $1.34 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 6.2%/yr for a decade (off $13M normalized FCF).
The market's 6.2% is more conservative than its 5-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.15B shares · net debt $31M
mean -296.7% · volatility σ 446% · implied rate exceeded in 1/2 yrs
Central path = implied 6.2%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (446%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $26M buybacks = $26M returned on $14M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 7 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -19%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 7 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $28M covers the $3M due within a year 8.5× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2021-09-30 (10-Q).
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~3.8% on $58M of debt.
Cash of $28M is below short-term debt of $29M — relies on refinancing/operations.
Mostly short-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-18
Nothing notable to watch.
Where each multiple sits in its own 5-yr range · 40th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 5-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 36.6 | 39.6 | 37.8 | 36.7 | 35.9 | 33.4 | 29.4 |
| Gross Profit | 63.4 | 60.4 | 62.2 | 63.3 | 64.1 | 66.6 | 70.6 |
| R&D | 24.9 | 24.5 | 29.3 | 34.0 | 29.9 | 27.7 | 25.4 |
| SG&A | 15.2 | 18.5 | 23.9 | 26.9 | 27.8 | 25.7 | 22.6 |
| Operating Income | -2.9 | -7.0 | -19.8 | -33.4 | -22.1 | -13.5 | -2.7 |
| Income Tax | 1.6 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.7 | 5.1 | 4.3 | 1.7 |
| Net Income | -16.0 | -48.8 | -36.0 | -40.6 | -26.5 | -17.5 | -6.7 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on KLTR: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-18
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $180.9M 100.0% | $178.7M 100.0% | $175.2M 100.0% | $168.8M 100.0% | $165.0M 100.0% | $120.4M 100.0% | $97.3M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $53.2M 29.4% | $59.6M 33.4% | $62.9M 35.9% | $61.9M 36.7% | $62.3M 37.8% | $47.7M 39.6% | $35.6M 36.6% |
| Gross Profit | $127.7M 70.6% | $119.1M 66.6% | $112.2M 64.1% | $106.9M 63.3% | $102.7M 62.2% | $72.8M 60.4% | $61.7M 63.4% |
| Research & Development | $46.0M 25.4% | $49.4M 27.7% | $52.4M 29.9% | $57.4M 34.0% | $48.4M 29.3% | $29.6M 24.5% | $24.2M 24.9% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $40.8M 22.6% | $46.0M 25.7% | $48.7M 27.8% | $45.4M 26.9% | $39.5M 23.9% | $22.2M 18.5% | $14.8M 15.2% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $132.6M 73.3% | $143.2M 80.1% | $150.9M 86.1% | $163.3M 96.7% | $135.4M 82.0% | $81.3M 67.5% | $64.5M 66.3% |
| Operating Income | -$5.0M -2.7% | -$24.1M -13.5% | -$38.7M -22.1% | -$56.4M -33.4% | -$32.7M -19.8% | -$8.5M -7.0% | -$2.8M -2.9% |
| Interest Expense | $2.2M 1.2% | $2.7M 1.5% | $3.2M 1.8% | $2.3M 1.4% | $3.0M 1.8% | $4.1M 3.4% | $4.3M 4.4% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$4.0M -2.2% | $434K 0.2% | $1.2M 0.7% | -$4.2M -2.5% | -$20.1M -12.2% | -$46.7M -38.8% | -$11.2M -11.5% |
| Pretax Income | -$9.0M -5.0% | -$23.7M -13.2% | -$37.5M -21.4% | -$60.6M -35.9% | -$52.8M -32.0% | -$55.2M -45.8% | -$14.0M -14.3% |
| Income Tax Expense | $3.1M 1.7% | $7.7M 4.3% | $8.9M 5.1% | $7.9M 4.7% | $6.6M 4.0% | $3.6M 3.0% | $1.6M 1.6% |
| Net Income | -$12.1M -6.7% | -$31.3M -17.5% | -$46.4M -26.5% | -$68.5M -40.6% | -$59.4M -36.0% | -$58.8M -48.8% | -$15.6M -16.0% |
| Per Share | |||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-0.08 | $-0.21 | $-0.34 | $-0.53 | $-0.95 | $-2.83 | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-0.08 | $-0.21 | $-0.34 | — | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 152.9M | 147.9M | 138.2M | 130.4M | 71.1M | 24.9M | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 152.9M | 147.9M | 138.2M | — | — | — | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Ranked against 743 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSM | $11.27T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,121 |
| NVDA | $5.40T | 45.4× | 40.5× | 25.0× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.97T | 45.1× | 34.7× | 11.9× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 68.1% | 0.6× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.67T | 27.5× | 19.4× | 11.1× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 27.7% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.70T | 75.0× | 66.9× | 26.5× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.14T | 133.8× | 63.0× | 30.5× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $912.5B | 211.3× | 215.9× | 26.3× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| INTC | $542.3B | — | 67.3× | 10.3× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $433.7B | 43.0× | 36.4× | 7.7× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| PLTR | $424.8B | 282.0× | 294.0× | 94.9× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| DELL | $370.4B | 65.4× | 34.9× | 3.3× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| LRCX | $365.5B | 69.4× | 58.4× | 19.8× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 37.4% | 0.7× | 2,500 |
| AMAT | $352.5B | 51.3× | 40.5× | 12.4× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| RPAY | $340.5B | — | — | 1101.1× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -28.2% | -1.7× | 142 |
| UMC | $309.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| ARM | $293.3B | 324.3× | 252.8× | 59.6× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| SNDK | $261.6B | — | — | 35.6× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.8% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| SAP | $257.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 794 |
| ANET | $250.5B | 72.5× | 63.3× | 27.8× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 39.0% | 28.4% | 28.4% | — | 1,930 |
| PANW | $242.9B | 227.2× | 151.7× | 26.3× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| TXN | $242.4B | 48.9× | 31.9× | 13.7× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.5% | 1.8× | 2,345 |
| CRM | $221.0B | 30.5× | 23.9× | 5.3× | 9.6% | 77.7% | 18.0% | 12.6% | 10.1% | 1.5× | 2,547 |
| IBM | $215.1B | 20.6× | — | 3.2× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| MRVL | $207.0B | 79.6× | 135.2× | 25.3× | 42.1% | 51.0% | 32.6% | 18.7% | 14.2% | 2.9× | 1,477 |
| QCOM | $190.9B | 35.5× | 14.3× | 4.3× | 13.7% | 55.4% | 12.5% | 26.1% | 15.4% | 1.1× | 2,611 |
| KLTR | $198M | — | — | 1.1× | 1.2% | 70.6% | -6.7% | -191% | -18.7% | -126.8× | 95 |
Peers = companies sharing KLTR's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.