Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional accumulation: ownership increased +0.94% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
This company doesn't have positive free cash flow, so a reverse DCF can't be run.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
Free-cash-flow coverage unavailable. Last year: $1M dividends + $0 buybacks = $1M returned on -$16M FCF.
2 consecutive years of dividend increases · -2%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -16%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
$1M of principal comes due within a year. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2020-01-31 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~6.7% on $32M of debt.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
No standout strengths flagged.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2026 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 4.4× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 50.1 | 57.0 | 59.4 | — | 58.9 | — | 58.9 | 67.1 |
| Gross Profit | 49.9 | 43.0 | 40.6 | — | 41.1 | — | 41.1 | 32.9 |
| R&D | 0.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Income | 27.6 | 13.6 | 4.9 | — | 4.8 | — | -5.5 | -8.1 |
| Income Tax | 5.4 | 4.0 | 3.2 | — | 3.2 | — | -0.2 | 4.0 |
| Net Income | 22.2 | 9.6 | 1.7 | — | 4.4 | — | -10.8 | -13.1 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on LAKE: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2026
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $192.6M 100.0% | $167.2M 100.0% | $6.3M 100.0% | $124.7M 100.0% | $6.0M 100.0% | $112.8M 100.0% | $118.4M 100.0% | $159.0M 100.0% | $107.8M 100.0% | $99.0M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $129.3M 67.1% | $98.5M 58.9% | — | $73.5M 58.9% | — | $67.0M 59.4% | $67.5M 57.0% | $79.7M 50.1% | $69.9M 64.8% | $65.1M 65.8% |
| Gross Profit | $63.3M 32.9% | $68.7M 41.1% | — | $51.2M 41.1% | — | $45.8M 40.6% | $50.9M 43.0% | $79.3M 49.9% | $37.9M 35.2% | $33.9M 34.2% |
| Research & Development | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $200K 0.1% | $200K 0.2% | $200K 0.2% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $77.0M 40.0% | $67.4M 40.3% | — | $45.2M 36.3% | — | $40.3M 35.7% | $34.9M 29.5% | $35.4M 22.3% | $32.0M 29.7% | $30.3M 30.6% |
| Operating Income | -$15.5M -8.1% | -$9.3M -5.5% | — | $6.0M 4.8% | — | $5.5M 4.9% | $16.0M 13.6% | $43.9M 27.6% | $5.9M 5.5% | $3.6M 3.6% |
| Interest Expense | $2.1M 1.1% | $1.6M 1.0% | — | $52K 0.0% | — | $37K 0.0% | $15K 0.0% | $23K 0.0% | $116K 0.1% | $125K 0.1% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$40K -0.0% | $198K 0.1% | — | $3.4M 2.7% | — | — | $121K 0.1% | $50K 0.0% | -$7K -0.0% | $41K 0.0% |
| Pretax Income | -$17.7M -9.2% | -$18.4M -11.0% | — | $9.4M 7.5% | — | $5.5M 4.8% | $16.2M 13.6% | $43.9M 27.6% | $5.8M 5.3% | $3.5M 3.5% |
| Income Tax Expense | $7.6M 4.0% | -$281K -0.2% | — | $3.9M 3.2% | — | $3.6M 3.2% | $4.8M 4.0% | $8.6M 5.4% | $2.5M 2.3% | $2.0M 2.0% |
| Net Income | -$25.3M -13.1% | -$18.1M -10.8% | — | $5.4M 4.4% | — | $1.9M 1.7% | $11.4M 9.6% | $35.3M 22.2% | $3.3M 3.0% | $1.5M 1.5% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-2.63 | $-2.43 | — | $0.74 | — | $0.25 | $1.44 | $4.43 | $0.41 | $0.18 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-2.63 | $-2.43 | — | $0.72 | — | $0.24 | $1.41 | $4.34 | $0.41 | $0.18 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 9.6M | 7.4M | — | 7.4M | — | 7.6M | 7.9M | 8.0M | 8.0M | 8.1M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 9.6M | 7.4M | — | 7.5M | — | 7.7M | 8.1M | 8.1M | 8.0M | 8.2M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 490 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN | $2.70T | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.5% | 16.2% | — | 5,764 |
| TSLA | $1.37T | 339.1× | 145.5× | 14.5× | -2.9% | 18.0% | 4.0% | 4.6% | 4.2% | 0.9× | 4,029 |
| TM | $614.2B | 60.0× | 24.8× | 2.6× | 3.8% | 18.4% | 4.4% | 7.9% | 5.9% | 1.7× | 665 |
| PDD | $442.6B | 32.9× | 31.9× | 7.2× | 14.5% | 56.3% | 22.7% | 23.7% | 23.7% | — | 548 |
| HD | $301.3B | 21.3× | 14.3× | 1.8× | 3.2% | 33.3% | 8.6% | 110% | 22.8% | 2.0× | 3,970 |
| BABA | $201.7B | 135.7× | — | 1.4× | 8.1% | 39.8% | 10.1% | 9.8% | 9.8% | — | 1,298 |
| TJX | $140.1B | 26.0× | — | 2.3× | 7.1% | 31.0% | 9.1% | 53.9% | 42.1% | — | 2,608 |
| HTHT | $132.7B | 187.9× | 114.3× | — | — | — | — | 39.7% | 27.3% | 0.7× | 258 |
| SBUX | $109.9B | 59.3× | 26.8× | 3.0× | 2.8% | — | 5.0% | -22.9% | 23.3% | 3.4× | 2,252 |
| LOW | $108.9B | 16.4× | 12.0× | 1.3× | 3.1% | 33.5% | 7.7% | -67.1% | 22.3% | 3.2× | 2,591 |
| ABNB | $101.7B | — | 37.9× | 8.3× | 10.3% | 83.0% | 20.5% | 30.6% | 24.6% | 0.8× | 1,246 |
| MELI | $92.5B | 46.3× | — | 3.2× | 39.1% | 44.5% | 6.9% | 29.6% | 12.5% | — | 1,380 |
| MAR | $88.8B | 35.1× | 20.6× | 3.4× | 4.3% | — | 9.9% | -69.0% | -69.4% | 0.0× | 1,559 |
| LKNCY | $86.3B | 168.2× | 90.8× | 12.3× | 48.9% | — | 7.3% | 23.0% | 23.0% | — | 9 |
| GM | $78.3B | 26.5× | 3.9× | 0.4× | -1.3% | — | 1.5% | 4.4% | 4.4% | — | 1,447 |
| ROST | $74.0B | 34.7× | 22.0× | 3.3× | 7.7% | 27.7% | 9.4% | 34.7% | 27.8% | 0.5× | 1,276 |
| ORLY | $71.5B | 28.6× | 19.5× | 4.0× | 6.4% | 51.6% | 14.3% | -333% | 48.3% | 1.5× | 1,569 |
| HLT | $69.7B | 49.4× | 24.0× | 5.8× | 7.7% | — | 12.1% | -27.0% | -27.0% | — | 1,126 |
| RCL | $67.7B | 16.0× | — | 3.8× | 8.8% | 49.4% | 23.8% | 42.5% | 32.3% | — | 1,114 |
| SE | $62.0B | 40.2× | 24.6× | 2.7× | 36.4% | 44.7% | 6.9% | 12.6% | 12.6% | — | 718 |
| F | $54.2B | — | 4.5× | 0.3× | 1.2% | 6.8% | -4.4% | -22.7% | -22.7% | — | — |
| NKE | $53.9B | 17.3× | — | 1.2× | 0.2% | 42.9% | 6.7% | 20.9% | 13.6% | — | 1,848 |
| EBAY | $50.7B | 26.0× | 18.4× | 4.6× | 7.9% | 71.5% | 18.3% | 45.3% | 38.8% | 0.3× | 1,182 |
| AZO | $47.8B | 19.6× | 13.3× | 2.5× | 2.4% | 52.6% | 13.2% | -73.2% | 46.4% | 2.1× | 1,245 |
| CMG | $44.8B | 29.4× | 19.4× | 3.8× | 5.4% | — | 12.9% | 54.3% | 54.3% | 0.0× | 1,203 |
| LAKE | $103M | — | — | 0.5× | 15.2% | 32.9% | -13.1% | -19.6% | -15.7% | -2.5× | 71 |
Peers = companies sharing LAKE's sector (Consumer Cyclical) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.