Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 305 of 5,944 reporting institutions (94th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $38.43 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 41.4%/yr for a decade (off $9M normalized FCF).
The market's 41.4% is more optimistic than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.05B shares · net debt -$99M
mean -262.9% · volatility σ 76% · implied rate exceeded in 0/2 yrs
Central path = implied 41.4%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (76%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
5/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on $12M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -10%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $261.3M 100.0% | $198.5M 100.0% | $209.9M 100.0% | $242.1M 100.0% | $270.1M 100.0% | $222.8M 100.0% | $176.6M 100.0% | $191.4M 100.0% | $138.6M 100.0% | $101.3M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $183.4M 70.2% | $165.5M 83.4% | $163.8M 78.0% | $191.2M 79.0% | $192.8M 71.4% | $163.4M 73.4% | $124.3M 70.4% | $124.4M 65.0% | $94.3M 68.1% | $78.2M 77.1% |
| Gross Profit | $78.0M 29.8% | $33.0M 16.6% | $46.1M 22.0% | $50.8M 21.0% | $77.3M 28.6% | $59.4M 26.6% | $52.3M 29.6% | $67.0M 35.0% | $44.3M 31.9% | $23.2M 22.9% |
| Research & Development | $48.0M 18.4% | $45.1M 22.7% | $46.2M 22.0% | $53.8M 22.2% | $54.8M 20.3% | $41.2M 18.5% | $28.1M 15.9% | $21.1M 11.0% | $15.1M 10.9% | $15.2M 15.0% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $54.2M 20.7% | $49.3M 24.8% | $45.9M 21.9% | $48.3M 19.9% | $52.7M 19.5% | $39.2M 17.6% | $34.1M 19.3% | $28.8M 15.1% | $19.4M 14.0% | $17.3M 17.0% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $104.5M 40.0% | $98.7M 49.7% | $92.9M 44.2% | $105.9M 43.8% | $107.5M 39.8% | $80.4M 36.1% | $62.2M 35.2% | $49.9M 26.1% | $34.5M 24.9% | $32.5M 32.1% |
| Operating Income | -$26.6M -10.2% | -$65.6M -33.1% | -$46.8M -22.3% | -$55.1M -22.8% | -$30.2M -11.2% | -$21.0M -9.4% | -$9.9M -5.6% | $17.1M 8.9% | $9.8M 7.1% | -$9.3M -9.2% |
| Interest Expense | $1.1M 0.4% | $105K 0.1% | $67K 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest & Investment Income | $4.9M 1.9% | $1.8M 0.9% | $1.4M 0.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$40K -0.0% | $3.1M 1.6% | $2.8M 1.3% | $338K 0.1% | $336K 0.1% | $378K 0.2% | $535K 0.3% | -$253K -0.1% | -$1.8M -1.3% | -$753K -0.7% |
| Pretax Income | -$22.8M -8.7% | -$60.9M -30.7% | -$42.6M -20.3% | -$54.2M -22.4% | -$30.0M -11.1% | -$20.6M -9.2% | -$6.8M -3.8% | $17.5M 9.2% | $6.7M 4.8% | -$12.3M -12.2% |
| Income Tax Expense | $699K 0.3% | -$76K -0.0% | -$978K -0.5% | $344K 0.1% | -$375K -0.1% | $340K 0.2% | $6.1M 3.5% | $3.6M 1.9% | $4.9M 3.5% | $1.9M 1.9% |
| Net Income | -$23.5M -9.0% | -$60.8M -30.6% | -$41.7M -19.9% | -$54.6M -22.5% | -$29.7M -11.0% | -$20.9M -9.4% | -$12.9M -7.3% | $13.9M 7.3% | $1.8M 1.3% | -$14.2M -14.0% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-0.47 | $-1.27 | $-0.90 | $-1.23 | $-0.70 | $-0.55 | $-0.35 | $0.38 | $0.00 | $-5.68 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-0.47 | $-1.27 | $-0.90 | $-1.23 | $-0.70 | $-0.55 | $-0.35 | $0.32 | $0.00 | $-5.68 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 50.0M | 47.9M | 46.1M | 44.4M | 42.1M | 38.4M | 37.1M | 24.9M | 2.7M | 2.5M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 50.0M | 47.9M | 46.1M | 44.4M | 42.1M | 38.4M | 37.1M | 30.0M | 2.7M | 2.5M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
No standout strengths flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 8-yr range · 100th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 8-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 65.0 | 70.4 | 73.4 | 71.4 | 79.0 | 78.0 | 83.4 | 70.2 |
| Gross Profit | 35.0 | 29.6 | 26.6 | 28.6 | 21.0 | 22.0 | 16.6 | 29.8 |
| R&D | 11.0 | 15.9 | 18.5 | 20.3 | 22.2 | 22.0 | 22.7 | 18.4 |
| SG&A | 15.1 | 19.3 | 17.6 | 19.5 | 19.9 | 21.9 | 24.8 | 20.7 |
| Operating Income | 8.9 | -5.6 | -9.4 | -11.2 | -22.8 | -22.3 | -33.1 | -10.2 |
| Income Tax | 1.9 | 3.5 | 0.2 | -0.1 | 0.1 | -0.5 | -0.0 | 0.3 |
| Net Income | 7.3 | -7.3 | -9.4 | -11.0 | -22.5 | -19.9 | -30.6 | -9.0 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on LASR: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Ranked against 743 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSM | $10.83T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,121 |
| NVDA | $5.20T | 43.6× | 39.0× | 24.1× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.98T | 45.2× | 34.8× | 12.0× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 68.1% | 0.6× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.64T | 27.3× | 19.3× | 11.0× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 27.7% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.65T | 72.8× | 65.1× | 25.8× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.04T | 122.1× | 57.5× | 27.8× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $888.5B | 205.7× | 210.2× | 25.6× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| INTC | $543.3B | — | 67.4× | 10.3× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $436.6B | 43.2× | 36.6× | 7.7× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| PLTR | $416.9B | 276.7× | 288.5× | 93.2× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| DELL | $383.6B | 67.8× | 36.1× | 3.4× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| LRCX | $341.6B | 64.9× | 54.5× | 18.5× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 37.4% | 0.7× | 2,500 |
| AMAT | $331.0B | 48.2× | 38.1× | 11.7× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| RPAY | $325.1B | — | — | 1051.3× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -28.2% | -1.7× | 142 |
| UMC | $283.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| ARM | $281.9B | 311.6× | 242.9× | 57.3× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| SAP | $261.9B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 794 |
| PANW | $250.9B | 234.8× | 156.8× | 27.2× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| ANET | $250.7B | 72.6× | 63.3× | 27.8× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 39.0% | 28.4% | 28.4% | — | 1,930 |
| TXN | $236.9B | 47.8× | 31.2× | 13.4× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.5% | 1.8× | 2,345 |
| CRM | $225.6B | 31.1× | 24.4× | 5.4× | 9.6% | 77.7% | 18.0% | 12.6% | 10.1% | 1.5× | 2,547 |
| IBM | $222.8B | 21.3× | — | 3.3× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| SNDK | $221.9B | — | — | 30.2× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.8% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| QCOM | $198.5B | 36.9× | 14.9× | 4.5× | 13.7% | 55.4% | 12.5% | 26.1% | 15.4% | 1.1× | 2,611 |
| MRVL | $194.6B | 74.8× | 127.2× | 23.8× | 42.1% | 51.0% | 32.6% | 18.7% | 14.2% | 2.9× | 1,477 |
| LASR | $2.0B | — | — | 7.5× | 31.6% | 29.8% | -9.0% | -10.3% | -10.3% | — | 305 |
Peers = companies sharing LASR's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.