Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 340 of 5,944 reporting institutions (95th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A balanced mix of reinvestment and shareholder returns.
Insufficient data. Current ROIC on all capital: 23%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $587M covers the $2M due within a year 391.6× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-12-31 (10-K).
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.” Effective rate ~4860.0% on $2M of debt.
Cash of $587M fully covers short-term debt of $2M.
Mostly short-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $10.25 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds -21.9%/yr for a decade (off $296M normalized FCF).
The market's -21.9% is more conservative than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.14B shares · net debt -$586M
mean 9.8% · volatility σ 58% · implied rate exceeded in 6/9 yrs
Central path = implied -21.9%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (58%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 10% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $27M dividends + $2M buybacks = $29M returned on $281M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 44d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.06B 100.0% | $4.38B 100.0% | $4.73B 100.0% | $5.20B 100.0% | $5.13B 100.0% | $4.33B 100.0% | $4.81B 100.0% | $4.34B 100.0% | $4.24B 100.0% | $4.13B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $3.31B 81.7% | $3.63B 82.9% | $3.87B 81.9% | $4.17B 80.1% | $4.03B 78.6% | $3.38B 78.0% | $3.73B 77.5% | $3.36B 77.4% | $3.06B 72.2% | $2.85B 69.0% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $3.08B 72.5% | $2.85B 69.1% |
| Gross Profit | $744.1M 18.3% | $749.1M 17.1% | $853.8M 18.1% | $976.8M 18.8% | $1.04B 20.2% | $904.1M 20.9% | $1.02B 21.3% | $912.1M 21.0% | $882.4M 20.8% | $901.7M 21.9% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $488.3M 12.0% | $508.8M 11.6% | $465.4M 9.8% | $427.3M 8.2% | $422.1M 8.2% | $424.4M 9.8% | $469.7M 9.8% | $425.1M 9.8% | $400.5M 9.4% | $395.7M 9.6% |
| Interest Expense | $72.9M 1.8% | $85.9M 2.0% | $88.4M 1.9% | $85.5M 1.6% | $76.5M 1.5% | $82.7M 1.9% | $90.7M 1.9% | $60.9M 1.4% | $43.5M 1.0% | $38.8M 0.9% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $6.6M 0.2% | $6.6M 0.2% | $5.4M 0.1% | $4.1M 0.1% | $2.6M 0.1% | $3.1M 0.1% | $7.4M 0.2% | $8.4M 0.2% | $7.6M 0.2% | $3.9M 0.1% |
| Pretax Income | $289.7M 7.1% | -$509.2M -11.6% | -$173.4M -3.7% | $403.6M 7.8% | $522.1M 10.2% | $327.9M 7.6% | $403.5M 8.4% | $407.8M 9.4% | $432.0M 10.2% | $487.1M 11.8% |
| Income Tax Expense | $54.3M 1.3% | $2.2M 0.1% | -$36.6M -0.8% | $93.7M 1.8% | $119.5M 2.3% | $74.8M 1.7% | $89.4M 1.9% | $84.1M 1.9% | $138.4M 3.3% | $120.0M 2.9% |
| Net Income | $235.4M 5.8% | -$511.4M -11.7% | -$136.8M -2.9% | $309.9M 6.0% | $402.6M 7.8% | $253.0M 5.8% | $314.0M 6.5% | $323.5M 7.5% | $292.6M 6.9% | $385.8M 9.4% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $1.70 | $-3.73 | $-1.00 | $2.28 | $2.95 | $1.86 | $2.33 | $2.41 | $2.15 | $2.80 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $1.69 | $-3.73 | $-1.00 | $2.27 | $2.94 | $1.86 | $2.32 | $2.39 | $2.13 | $2.76 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 138.5M | 137.3M | 136.3M | 136.1M | 136.3M | 135.7M | 134.8M | 134.3M | 136.0M | 137.9M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 139.7M | 137.3M | 136.3M | 136.5M | 136.7M | 135.9M | 135.4M | 135.2M | 137.3M | 140.0M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Ranked against 490 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN | $2.65T | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.5% | 16.2% | — | 5,764 |
| TSLA | $1.34T | 331.6× | 142.2× | 14.2× | -2.9% | 18.0% | 4.0% | 4.6% | 4.2% | 0.9× | 4,029 |
| TM | $608.8B | 59.5× | 24.6× | 2.6× | 3.8% | 18.4% | 4.4% | 7.9% | 5.9% | 1.7× | 665 |
| PDD | $448.4B | 33.4× | 32.3× | 7.3× | 14.5% | 56.3% | 22.7% | 23.7% | 23.7% | — | 548 |
| HD | $301.3B | 21.3× | 14.3× | 1.8× | 3.2% | 33.3% | 8.6% | 110% | 22.8% | 2.0× | 3,970 |
| BABA | $199.3B | 134.1× | — | 1.3× | 8.1% | 39.8% | 10.1% | 9.8% | 9.8% | — | 1,298 |
| TJX | $136.0B | 25.2× | — | 2.3× | 7.1% | 31.0% | 9.1% | 53.9% | 42.1% | — | 2,608 |
| HTHT | $131.2B | 185.7× | 113.0× | — | — | — | — | 39.7% | 27.3% | 0.7× | 258 |
| SBUX | $110.7B | 59.7× | 26.9× | 3.0× | 2.8% | — | 5.0% | -22.9% | 23.3% | 3.4× | 2,252 |
| LOW | $108.9B | 16.4× | 12.0× | 1.3× | 3.1% | 33.5% | 7.7% | -67.1% | 22.3% | 3.2× | 2,591 |
| ABNB | $102.7B | — | 38.3× | 8.4× | 10.3% | 83.0% | 20.5% | 30.6% | 24.6% | 0.8× | 1,246 |
| MELI | $93.3B | 46.7× | — | 3.2× | 39.1% | 44.5% | 6.9% | 29.6% | 12.5% | — | 1,380 |
| MAR | $89.1B | 35.2× | 20.7× | 3.4× | 4.3% | — | 9.9% | -69.0% | -69.4% | 0.0× | 1,559 |
| LKNCY | $87.3B | 170.2× | 91.9× | 12.4× | 48.9% | — | 7.3% | 23.0% | 23.0% | — | 9 |
| GM | $76.2B | 25.8× | 3.7× | 0.4× | -1.3% | — | 1.5% | 4.4% | 4.4% | — | 1,447 |
| ROST | $72.5B | 34.0× | 21.6× | 3.2× | 7.7% | 27.7% | 9.4% | 34.7% | 27.8% | 0.5× | 1,276 |
| ORLY | $70.5B | 28.2× | 19.2× | 4.0× | 6.4% | 51.6% | 14.3% | -333% | 48.3% | 1.5× | 1,569 |
| HLT | $70.4B | 49.9× | 24.2× | 5.8× | 7.7% | — | 12.1% | -27.0% | -27.0% | — | 1,126 |
| RCL | $68.8B | 16.3× | — | 3.8× | 8.8% | 49.4% | 23.8% | 42.5% | 32.3% | — | 1,114 |
| SE | $63.4B | 41.1× | 25.1× | 2.8× | 36.4% | 44.7% | 6.9% | 12.6% | 12.6% | — | 718 |
| F | $53.1B | — | 4.4× | 0.3× | 1.2% | 6.8% | -4.4% | -22.7% | -22.7% | — | — |
| NKE | $53.1B | 17.0× | — | 1.1× | 0.2% | 42.9% | 6.7% | 20.9% | 13.6% | — | 1,848 |
| EBAY | $49.0B | 25.1× | 17.8× | 4.4× | 7.9% | 71.5% | 18.3% | 45.3% | 38.8% | 0.3× | 1,182 |
| AZO | $47.8B | 19.7× | 13.3× | 2.5× | 2.4% | 52.6% | 13.2% | -73.2% | 46.4% | 2.1× | 1,245 |
| CMG | $45.0B | 29.5× | 19.4× | 3.8× | 5.4% | — | 12.9% | 54.3% | 54.3% | 0.0× | 1,203 |
| LEG | $1.4B | 6.1× | — | 0.3× | -7.5% | 18.3% | 5.8% | 23.0% | 23.0% | — | 340 |
Peers = companies sharing LEG's sector (Consumer Cyclical) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
Nothing notable to watch.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 2th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Operating leverage needs meaningful revenue change.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 77.4 | 77.5 | 78.0 | 78.6 | 80.1 | 81.9 | 82.9 | 81.7 |
| Gross Profit | 21.0 | 21.3 | 20.9 | 20.2 | 18.8 | 18.1 | 17.1 | 18.3 |
| SG&A | 9.8 | 9.8 | 9.8 | 8.2 | 8.2 | 9.8 | 11.6 | 12.0 |
| Income Tax | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 2.3 | 1.8 | -0.8 | 0.1 | 1.3 |
| Net Income | 7.5 | 6.5 | 5.8 | 7.8 | 6.0 | -2.9 | -11.7 | 5.8 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on LEG: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.