Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 387 of 5,944 reporting institutions (96th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 4%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $2.0B covers all $1.2B of scheduled principal — no refinancing pressure. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-12-31 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Coverage is adequate but not comfortable. Effective rate ~1.2% on $1.2B of debt.
Cash of $2.0B fully covers short-term debt of $0.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $448.7M 100.0% | $442.0M 100.0% | $320.2M 100.0% | $293.8M 100.0% | $298.3M 100.0% | $247.2M 100.0% | $209.7M 100.0% | $193.0M 100.0% | $218.4M 100.0% | $311.3M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $331.2M 73.8% | $330.5M 74.8% | $208.1M 65.0% | $175.9M 59.9% | $183.8M 61.6% | $149.6M 60.5% | $177.2M 84.5% | $210.9M 109.3% | $188.2M 86.2% | $266.2M 85.5% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $136.1M 62.3% | $234.3M 75.3% |
| Gross Profit | $117.5M 26.2% | $111.5M 25.2% | $112.1M 35.0% | $117.9M 40.1% | $114.5M 38.4% | $97.6M 39.5% | $32.5M 15.5% | -$17.9M -9.3% | $30.2M 13.8% | $45.1M 14.5% |
| Research & Development | $16.9M 3.8% | $17.2M 3.9% | $14.2M 4.4% | $14.8M 5.0% | $2.1M 0.7% | $2.8M 1.1% | $14.6M 7.0% | $26.1M 13.5% | $15.7M 7.2% | $47.9M 15.4% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $36.2M 8.1% | $35.0M 7.9% | $36.9M 11.5% | $33.9M 11.5% | $36.0M 12.1% | $36.0M 14.6% | $33.7M 16.1% | $39.9M 20.7% | $43.7M 20.0% | $46.2M 14.8% |
| Operating Income | $50.2M 11.2% | $48.0M 10.9% | $52.4M 16.4% | $59.7M 20.3% | $68.3M 22.9% | $51.0M 20.6% | -$19.7M -9.4% | -$92.4M -47.9% | -$44.7M -20.5% | -$61.7M -19.8% |
| Interest Expense | $14.0M 3.1% | $2.7M 0.6% | $1.3M 0.4% | $500K 0.2% | $100K 0.0% | $100K 0.0% | $3.0M 1.4% | $4.1M 2.1% | $5.3M 2.4% | $19.7M 6.3% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $44.7M 10.0% | $12.9M 2.9% | $8.7M 2.7% | $2.0M 0.7% | $100K 0.0% | $500K 0.2% | $2.2M 1.0% | $2.5M 1.3% | $1.3M 0.6% | $800K 0.3% |
| Pretax Income | $85.9M 19.1% | $73.0M 16.5% | $84.5M 26.4% | $67.8M 23.1% | $135.9M 45.6% | $53.0M 21.4% | -$16.2M -7.7% | -$104.1M -53.9% | $12.1M 5.5% | -$67.6M -21.7% |
| Income Tax Expense | $8.1M 1.8% | -$200K -0.0% | $100K 0.0% | $15.6M 5.3% | -$39.1M -13.1% | -$1.4M -0.6% | $300K 0.1% | $0 0.0% | -$100K -0.0% | -$600K -0.2% |
| Net Income | $78.0M 17.4% | $72.0M 16.3% | $84.0M 26.2% | $52.0M 17.7% | $175.0M 58.7% | $54.4M 22.0% | -$16.5M -7.9% | -$104.1M -53.9% | $12.2M 5.6% | -$67.0M -21.5% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $4.33 | $4.49 | $5.55 | $3.47 | $10.03 | $0.59 | $-2.54 | $-12.23 | $0.58 | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | $3.90 | $4.47 | $5.44 | $3.38 | $9.75 | $0.57 | $-2.54 | — | $0.58 | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 18.0M | 16.3M | 15.2M | 14.6M | 13.5M | 9.8M | 9.6M | 9.2M | 9.1M | 9.1M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 19.9M | 16.4M | 15.5M | 15.0M | 13.9M | 10.1M | 9.6M | 9.2M | 9.1M | 9.1M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $149.85 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 26.7%/yr for a decade (off $24M normalized FCF).
The market's 26.7% is more optimistic than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.02B shares · net debt -$782M
mean 75.0% · volatility σ 239% · implied rate exceeded in 2/7 yrs
Central path = implied 26.7%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (239%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash conversion lags reported earnings — watch accruals. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on $31M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
Ranked against 238 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XOM | $682.3B | 24.4× | — | 2.0× | -5.0% | — | 8.7% | 11.1% | 10.7% | — | 4,568 |
| SHEL | $545.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,521 |
| CVX | $391.2B | 31.9× | — | 2.1× | -6.8% | 42.8% | 6.5% | 6.6% | 6.6% | — | 4,121 |
| TTE | $202.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 951 |
| COP | $166.8B | 21.0× | — | 2.8× | 7.7% | 62.1% | 13.6% | 12.4% | 12.2% | — | 2,450 |
| PBR | $155.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 524 |
| MPC | $128.7B | 31.9× | 11.0× | 1.0× | -4.4% | 10.0% | 3.0% | 23.4% | 20.6% | 0.2× | 1,802 |
| VLO | $127.5B | 54.5× | 24.1× | 1.0× | -5.5% | 4.4% | 1.9% | 9.9% | 7.1% | 1.7× | 1,781 |
| BP | $117.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,220 |
| PSX | $111.3B | 25.4× | — | 0.8× | -7.5% | 12.3% | 3.3% | 15.1% | 14.6% | — | 2,041 |
| EQNR | $110.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 398 |
| WMB | $87.7B | 33.6× | 17.8× | 7.3× | 13.8% | — | 21.9% | 20.4% | 6.3% | 4.4× | 1,736 |
| EPD | $84.1B | — | 12.6× | 1.6× | -6.4% | 26.7% | 11.0% | — | — | 3.7× | 1,573 |
| EOG | $79.0B | 15.9× | 7.7× | 3.5× | -4.5% | — | 22.0% | 16.7% | 13.2% | 0.7× | 1,525 |
| SLB | $77.9B | 22.2× | — | 2.2× | -1.6% | — | 9.4% | 12.9% | 9.4% | — | 1,624 |
| ET | $72.5B | — | 9.8× | 0.8× | 3.5% | 25.8% | 5.2% | 9.0% | 3.8% | 4.8× | 1,244 |
| KMI | $69.7B | 22.9× | 14.2× | 4.1× | 12.2% | — | 18.0% | 9.8% | 4.8% | 4.5× | 1,745 |
| TRGP | $61.2B | 33.6× | 16.2× | 3.6× | 3.9% | 38.3% | 11.3% | 62.7% | 9.4% | 3.6× | 979 |
| TS | $60.6B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 248 |
| MPLX | $59.4B | — | — | 4.6× | 8.9% | — | 38.1% | — | — | — | 622 |
| LNG | $59.3B | 11.2× | 7.8× | 3.0× | 27.2% | — | 26.7% | 67.3% | 17.3% | 2.2× | 1,303 |
| OKE | $58.7B | 17.2× | 12.4× | 1.8× | 55.0% | 30.5% | 10.1% | 15.1% | 6.3% | 4.4× | 1,622 |
| OXY | $58.5B | 36.8× | — | 2.7× | -1.9% | — | 11.0% | 6.6% | 4.2% | — | 1,250 |
| BKR | $56.2B | — | — | 2.0× | -0.3% | — | 9.3% | 13.7% | 13.3% | — | 1,095 |
| FANG | $56.0B | 34.4× | 11.2× | 3.7× | 35.8% | — | 11.1% | 4.5% | 3.2% | 2.3× | 1,141 |
| LEU | $2.7B | 38.4× | 31.8× | 6.0× | 1.5% | 26.2% | 17.3% | 10.2% | 4.0% | 19.5× | 387 |
Peers = companies sharing LEU's sector (Energy) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
No standout strengths flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 68th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 3.0× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 109.3 | 84.5 | 60.5 | 61.6 | 59.9 | 65.0 | 74.8 | 73.8 |
| Gross Profit | -9.3 | 15.5 | 39.5 | 38.4 | 40.1 | 35.0 | 25.2 | 26.2 |
| R&D | 13.5 | 7.0 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 5.0 | 4.4 | 3.9 | 3.8 |
| SG&A | 20.7 | 16.1 | 14.6 | 12.1 | 11.5 | 11.5 | 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Operating Income | -47.9 | -9.4 | 20.6 | 22.9 | 20.3 | 16.4 | 10.9 | 11.2 |
| Income Tax | 0.0 | 0.1 | -0.6 | -13.1 | 5.3 | 0.0 | -0.0 | 1.8 |
| Net Income | -53.9 | -7.9 | 22.0 | 58.7 | 17.7 | 26.2 | 16.3 | 17.4 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on LEU: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.