Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional accumulation: ownership increased +1.60% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: 28%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $20M covers the $0 due within a year 20201000.0× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2015-03-31 (10-Q).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit. Interest last disclosed in FY2024 (no longer broken out).
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $6.20 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds -6.9%/yr for a decade (off $8M normalized FCF).
The market's -6.9% is more conservative than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.01B shares · net debt -$20M
mean 21.8% · volatility σ 67% · implied rate exceeded in 6/9 yrs
Central path = implied -6.9%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (67%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
7/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 20% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $2M dividends + $3M buybacks = $5M returned on $11M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
Ranked against 229 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WMT | $858.2B | 39.4× | — | 1.2× | 4.7% | 24.9% | 3.1% | 22.0% | 15.5% | — | 4,273 |
| COST | $396.1B | 49.1× | 30.3× | 1.4× | 8.2% | 12.8% | 2.9% | 27.8% | 23.2% | 0.5× | 4,050 |
| KO | $378.1B | 28.9× | 24.8× | 7.9× | 1.9% | 61.6% | 27.3% | 40.7% | 40.7% | — | 3,427 |
| PG | $345.5B | 22.6× | 16.3× | 4.1× | 0.3% | 51.2% | 19.0% | 30.6% | 18.4% | 1.5× | 3,849 |
| PM | $298.3B | 26.4× | 17.4× | 7.3× | 7.3% | 67.1% | 27.9% | -114% | -115% | 0.0× | 2,744 |
| PEP | $183.9B | 22.4× | 15.0× | 2.0× | 2.3% | 54.1% | 8.8% | 40.4% | 11.8% | 3.3× | 3,404 |
| MO | $117.4B | 17.0× | 13.6× | 5.0× | -3.1% | 62.5% | 29.8% | -198% | 31.3% | 2.5× | 2,375 |
| MDLZ | $80.7B | 33.0× | 18.9× | 2.1× | 5.8% | 28.4% | 6.4% | 9.5% | 8.6% | 0.6× | 1,821 |
| TGT | $70.0B | 19.0× | 10.2× | 0.7× | -1.7% | 27.9% | 3.5% | 22.9% | 12.1% | 1.7× | 1,771 |
| CL | $69.7B | 33.1× | 19.4× | 3.4× | 1.4% | 60.1% | 10.5% | 3948% | 26.5% | 2.0× | 1,873 |
| MNST | $43.6B | — | 16.4× | 5.3× | 10.7% | 55.8% | 23.0% | 23.1% | 23.1% | — | 1,169 |
| KDP | $43.2B | 20.8× | 14.5× | 2.6× | 8.2% | 54.2% | 12.5% | 8.1% | 5.0% | 4.0× | 784 |
| FMX | $41.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 290 |
| ADM | $41.1B | 38.1× | — | 0.5× | -6.2% | 6.3% | 1.3% | 4.7% | 3.6% | — | 1,070 |
| JBS | $40.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 241 |
| KR | $39.9B | 39.7× | 10.0× | 0.3× | 0.4% | — | 0.7% | 17.1% | 4.7% | 3.0× | 1,327 |
| SYY | $38.4B | 21.1× | 9.6× | 0.5× | 3.2% | 18.4% | 2.2% | 99.9% | 99.9% | — | 1,489 |
| HSY | $34.6B | — | 20.3× | 3.0× | 4.4% | 33.5% | 7.6% | 19.0% | 9.3% | 2.5× | 1,406 |
| EL | $34.4B | — | 782.5× | 2.4× | -8.2% | 74.0% | -7.9% | -29.3% | -29.3% | 0.1× | 800 |
| KVUE | $34.2B | 23.5× | 11.6× | 2.3× | -2.1% | 58.1% | 9.7% | 13.7% | 12.0% | 0.5× | 967 |
| KMB | $32.6B | 16.2× | 10.3× | 2.0× | -2.1% | 36.0% | 12.3% | 135% | 92.0% | 0.2× | 1,585 |
| KHC | $29.3B | — | — | 1.2× | -3.5% | 33.3% | -23.4% | -14.0% | -14.0% | — | 1,059 |
| DG | $27.1B | 18.0× | 8.0× | 0.6× | 5.2% | 30.7% | 3.5% | 17.8% | 17.8% | — | 1,099 |
| KOF | $23.6B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 249 |
| CHD | $23.2B | 31.6× | 18.9× | 3.7× | 1.6% | 44.7% | 11.9% | 18.4% | 11.9% | 1.7× | 1,004 |
| LFVN | $77M | 8.2× | 3.7× | 0.3× | 14.2% | 80.4% | 4.3% | 28.3% | 28.3% | — | 103 |
Peers = companies sharing LFVN's sector (Consumer Defensive) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $228.5M 100.0% | $200.2M 100.0% | $213.4M 100.0% | $206.4M 100.0% | $220.2M 100.0% | $232.9M 100.0% | $226.0M 100.0% | $203.2M 100.0% | $199.5M 100.0% | $206.5M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $44.9M 19.6% | $41.4M 20.7% | $43.4M 20.3% | $38.1M 18.5% | $38.2M 17.3% | $38.0M 16.3% | $38.0M 16.8% | $34.8M 17.1% | $33.5M 16.8% | $33.9M 16.4% |
| Gross Profit | $183.7M 80.4% | $158.7M 79.3% | $170.0M 79.7% | $168.3M 81.5% | $182.0M 82.7% | $195.0M 83.7% | $188.0M 83.2% | $168.4M 82.9% | $166.0M 83.2% | $172.6M 83.6% |
| Research & Development | $1.4M 0.6% | $700K 0.3% | $600K 0.3% | $700K 0.3% | $700K 0.3% | $900K 0.4% | $1.1M 0.5% | $1.2M 0.6% | $1.1M 0.6% | $1.0M 0.5% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $69.2M 30.3% | $68.5M 34.2% | $71.1M 33.3% | $63.4M 30.7% | $60.8M 27.6% | $67.9M 29.2% | $69.6M 30.8% | $59.8M 29.4% | $64.9M 32.5% | $56.1M 27.1% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $171.5M 75.0% | $154.4M 77.1% | $165.8M 77.7% | $160.7M 77.9% | $164.4M 74.7% | $179.5M 77.1% | $178.2M 78.9% | $158.0M 77.8% | $161.6M 81.0% | $159.2M 77.1% |
| Operating Income | $12.2M 5.3% | $4.3M 2.2% | $4.3M 2.0% | $7.6M 3.7% | $17.6M 8.0% | $15.5M 6.6% | $9.8M 4.3% | $10.3M 5.1% | $4.4M 2.2% | $13.4M 6.5% |
| Interest Expense | — | -$430K -0.2% | -$198K -0.1% | $10K 0.0% | $17K 0.0% | $120K 0.1% | $323K 0.1% | $456K 0.2% | $570K 0.3% | $3.3M 1.6% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $44K 0.0% | $18K 0.0% | -$260K -0.1% | -$2.9M -1.4% | -$383K -0.2% | -$805K -0.3% | -$584K -0.3% | -$775K -0.4% | -$1.5M -0.8% | -$4.7M -2.3% |
| Pretax Income | $12.2M 5.4% | $4.3M 2.2% | $4.0M 1.9% | $4.7M 2.3% | $17.2M 7.8% | $14.7M 6.3% | $9.2M 4.1% | $9.5M 4.7% | $2.9M 1.5% | $8.7M 4.2% |
| Income Tax Expense | $2.4M 1.1% | $1.4M 0.7% | $1.5M 0.7% | $1.6M 0.8% | $4.3M 2.0% | $3.1M 1.3% | $1.8M 0.8% | $3.8M 1.9% | $1.3M 0.7% | $2.6M 1.2% |
| Net Income | $9.8M 4.3% | $2.9M 1.5% | $2.5M 1.2% | $3.1M 1.5% | $12.9M 5.9% | $11.5M 5.0% | $7.4M 3.3% | $5.8M 2.8% | $1.6M 0.8% | $6.1M 3.0% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $0.80 | $0.24 | $0.20 | $0.24 | $0.92 | $0.82 | $0.53 | $0.41 | $0.12 | $0.44 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $0.75 | $0.23 | $0.20 | $0.24 | $0.90 | $0.79 | $0.50 | $0.41 | $0.11 | $0.42 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 12.3M | 12.5M | 12.6M | 12.9M | 14.1M | 14.1M | 14.1M | 14.0M | 13.9M | 13.7M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 13.0M | 13.0M | 12.6M | 13.1M | 14.3M | 14.6M | 15.0M | 14.1M | 14.1M | 14.5M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 22th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 12.8× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 17.1 | 16.8 | 16.3 | 17.3 | 18.5 | 20.3 | 20.7 | 19.6 |
| Gross Profit | 82.9 | 83.2 | 83.7 | 82.7 | 81.5 | 79.7 | 79.3 | 80.4 |
| R&D | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.6 |
| SG&A | 29.4 | 30.8 | 29.2 | 27.6 | 30.7 | 33.3 | 34.2 | 30.3 |
| Operating Income | 5.1 | 4.3 | 6.6 | 8.0 | 3.7 | 2.0 | 2.2 | 5.3 |
| Income Tax | 1.9 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 2.0 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 1.1 |
| Net Income | 2.8 | 3.3 | 5.0 | 5.9 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 4.3 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on LFVN: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.