Markets Screener Institutions Status About FAQ Insights API

Loading institutional data...

Request data / API access →

Data from SEC EDGAR filings: company financials and 13F holdings.

Disclaimer: QW Research is provided for informational and educational purposes only and is not investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Data is derived from public SEC 13F filings and may be incomplete, delayed, or inaccurate. Do not make investment decisions based on this content. QW Research does not share in any profits and accepts no liability for any losses or decisions made using this information. Past performance does not predict future results.

QW Research © 2026

LPCVU — Fundamentals, Valuation & Ownership | QW Research

Back to Markets

Launchpad Cadenza Acquisition Corp I (LPCVU)

Neutral

Insufficient data to determine institutional momentum.

Data as of Q1 2026

Loading snapshot...

Loading financials...

Loading valuation...

Loading quality & risk...

Loading dividends & returns...

Loading capital allocation...

Loading debt & leverage...

Loading performance...

Loading peer comparison...

Loading ownership map...

Loading crowding analysis...

Loading conviction analysis...

Institutional Ownership

—

of shares outstanding · 25 funds hold it

Ownership Change

—

vs last quarter

Crowding

77ᵗʰ pctl

more crowded than 77% of tracked stocks

Institutional Value

$60.4M

total position value across all 13F filers

Loading buy/sell flow...

Loading ownership trends...

Loading top holders...

Institutional Holders

Loading top holders...

No collected fundamentals to build a valuation model.

No collected fundamentals for a quality & risk analysis.

No collected fundamentals for a dividends & returns analysis.

No collected fundamentals for a capital-allocation analysis.

Buy / Sell Volume by Quarter

Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.

Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.

Loading ownership map...

Loading crowding analysis...

Institutional Trends (2 Quarters)

No trend data available for this metric.

Conviction-Weighted Ownership

Median weight: 0.17%Avg weight: 0.38%Max: 1.61%High conviction (>1%): 1

LMR Partners LLP

MMCAP International Inc. SPC

PICTON MAHONEY ASSET MANAGEMENT

HGC Investment Management

MILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT

OMERS ADMINISTRATION

Westchester Capital Management,

Lineage Point Capital

SYQUANT CAPITAL SAS

Crowding AnalysisCrowded

Holders25of 5,944

Avg: 68

Uncrowded77th percentileCrowded

Institutional Activity

Buy/Sell Ratio0.06x

31th percentile

3 buying48 selling

+3

New

-42

Closed

-15,544,634

Net shares

Ownership Concentration

Top 5: 62.9%Top 10: 88.2%

LMR Partners LLP16.0%

MMCAP International Inc. SPC16.0%

PICTON MAHONEY ASSET MANAGEMENT12.0%

HGC Investment Management11.6%

MILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT7.2%

Others (20)37.1%

Crowding AnalysisCrowded

Holders25of 5,944

Avg: 68

Uncrowded77th percentileCrowded

Institutional Activity

Buy/Sell Ratio0.06x

31th percentile

3 buying48 selling

+3

New

-42

Closed

-15,544,634

Net shares

Ownership Concentration

Top 5: 62.9%Top 10: 88.2%

LMR Partners LLP16.0%

MMCAP International Inc. SPC16.0%

PICTON MAHONEY ASSET MANAGEMENT12.0%

HGC Investment Management11.6%

MILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT7.2%

Others (20)37.1%

No collected fundamentals for a debt & leverage analysis.

Not enough quarter-end price history for a performance view. (Run collect_prices.py for this ticker.)

Ownership Map

Top 25 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.

Size by

Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position

Ownership Map

Top 25 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.

Size by

Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position

We haven't collected financials for LPCVU yet, so it can't be scored against its Financial Services peers.