Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 398 of 5,944 reporting institutions (96th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $65.82 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 11.5%/yr for a decade (off $176M normalized FCF).
The market's 11.5% is more optimistic than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.07B shares · net debt $56M
mean 296.2% · volatility σ 909% · implied rate exceeded in 3/8 yrs
Central path = implied 11.5%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (909%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash conversion lags reported earnings — watch accruals. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend takes 86% of free cash flow — sustainable but with limited headroom. Last year: $78M dividends + $61M buybacks = $139M returned on $91M FCF.
2 consecutive years of dividend increases · 11%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: 7%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $292M covers the $0 due within a year 292000000.0× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2023-12-31 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit. Effective rate ~4.9% on $348M of debt.
Cash of $292M fully covers short-term debt of $0.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.71B 100.0% | $2.94B 100.0% | $2.58B 100.0% | $3.85B 100.0% | $3.92B 100.0% | $2.40B 100.0% | $2.31B 100.0% | $2.83B 100.0% | $2.73B 100.0% | $2.23B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $2.12B 78.2% | $2.11B 71.7% | $1.99B 77.0% | $2.35B 61.1% | $1.95B 49.9% | $1.57B 65.3% | $2.01B 86.9% | $2.08B 73.7% | $2.00B 73.1% | $1.83B 81.9% |
| Gross Profit | $589.0M 21.8% | $832.0M 28.3% | $593.0M 23.0% | $1.50B 38.9% | $1.96B 50.1% | $833.0M 34.7% | $303.0M 13.1% | $744.0M 26.3% | $736.0M 26.9% | $404.3M 18.1% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $329.0M 12.1% | $291.0M 9.9% | $257.0M 10.0% | $264.0M 6.9% | $223.0M 5.7% | $195.0M 8.1% | $230.0M 10.0% | $209.0M 7.4% | $191.0M 7.0% | $185.1M 8.3% |
| Total Operating Expenses | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $2.21B 80.9% | $2.03B 90.9% |
| Operating Income | $209.0M 7.7% | $530.0M 18.0% | $287.0M 11.1% | $1.25B 32.4% | $1.73B 44.3% | $615.0M 25.6% | -$20.0M -0.9% | $526.0M 18.6% | $533.0M 19.5% | $210.2M 9.4% |
| Interest Expense | $17.0M 0.6% | $14.0M 0.5% | $17.0M 0.7% | $14.0M 0.4% | $15.0M 0.4% | $17.0M 0.7% | $18.0M 0.8% | $19.0M 0.7% | $20.0M 0.7% | $32.1M 1.4% |
| Interest & Investment Income | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $18.1M 0.6% | $9.5M 0.3% | $8.0M 0.4% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$15.0M -0.6% | $9.0M 0.3% | -$43.0M -1.7% | -$97.0M -2.5% | -$22.0M -0.6% | $4.0M 0.2% | -$3.0M -0.1% | -$2.0M -0.1% | -$23.0M -0.8% | -$45.3M -2.0% |
| Pretax Income | $196.0M 7.2% | $560.0M 19.0% | $252.0M 9.8% | $1.16B 30.1% | $1.70B 43.5% | $605.0M 25.2% | -$23.0M -1.0% | $521.0M 18.4% | $510.0M 18.7% | $170.1M 7.6% |
| Income Tax Expense | $50.0M 1.8% | $140.0M 4.8% | $74.0M 2.9% | $274.0M 7.1% | $402.0M 10.3% | $121.0M 5.0% | -$13.0M -0.6% | $122.0M 4.3% | $119.0M 4.4% | $19.8M 0.9% |
| Net Income | $146.0M 5.4% | $420.0M 14.3% | $178.0M 6.9% | $1.09B 28.2% | $1.38B 35.2% | $499.0M 20.8% | -$5.0M -0.2% | $395.0M 14.0% | $390.0M 14.3% | $149.8M 6.7% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $2.09 | $5.91 | $2.47 | $13.94 | $14.19 | $4.48 | $-0.04 | $2.76 | $2.70 | $1.04 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $2.08 | $5.89 | $2.46 | $13.87 | $14.09 | $4.46 | $-0.04 | $2.73 | $2.66 | $1.03 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 70.0M | 71.0M | 72.0M | 78.0M | 97.0M | 111.0M | 123.0M | 143.0M | 144.0M | 143.4M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 70.0M | 71.0M | 72.0M | 78.0M | 98.0M | 112.0M | 123.0M | 144.0M | 146.0M | 145.3M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
No standout strengths flagged.
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 70th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 7.6× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 73.7 | 86.9 | 65.3 | 49.9 | 61.1 | 77.0 | 71.7 | 78.2 |
| Gross Profit | 26.3 | 13.1 | 34.7 | 50.1 | 38.9 | 23.0 | 28.3 | 21.8 |
| SG&A | 7.4 | 10.0 | 8.1 | 5.7 | 6.9 | 10.0 | 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Operating Income | 18.6 | -0.9 | 25.6 | 44.3 | 32.4 | 11.1 | 18.0 | 7.7 |
| Income Tax | 4.3 | -0.6 | 5.0 | 10.3 | 7.1 | 2.9 | 4.8 | 1.8 |
| Net Income | 14.0 | -0.2 | 20.8 | 35.2 | 28.2 | 6.9 | 14.3 | 5.4 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on LPX: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Ranked against 238 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BHP | $439.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 713 |
| LIN | $215.3B | 31.4× | 19.3× | 6.3× | 3.0% | — | 20.3% | 18.0% | 10.9% | 2.1× | 2,148 |
| SCCO | $162.1B | 37.4× | 20.9× | 12.1× | 17.4% | 60.1% | 32.4% | 39.4% | 24.4% | 0.9× | 791 |
| CX | $147.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 297 |
| TX | $116.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 139 |
| FCX | $101.8B | — | 12.3× | 3.9× | 1.8% | 28.2% | 16.0% | 22.0% | 14.7% | 1.1× | 1,775 |
| AEM | $100.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,066 |
| SHW | $79.5B | 31.3× | — | 3.4× | 2.1% | 48.8% | 10.9% | 55.9% | 17.0% | — | 1,610 |
| ECL | $76.6B | 37.3× | 22.5× | 4.8× | 2.2% | 44.5% | 12.9% | 21.2% | 19.5% | 0.3× | 1,619 |
| B | $73.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 979 |
| WPM | $69.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 809 |
| APD | $63.7B | — | 90.0× | 5.3× | -0.5% | 31.4% | -3.3% | -2.6% | -2.6% | 0.1× | 1,702 |
| VALE | $61.6B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 537 |
| NUE | $61.2B | 35.3× | — | 1.9× | 5.7% | 11.9% | 5.4% | 8.3% | 8.3% | — | 1,325 |
| CRH | $58.0B | 15.7× | 9.3× | 1.6× | 5.3% | 36.1% | 10.0% | 15.6% | 9.2% | 2.2× | 9 |
| MT | $57.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 286 |
| DD | $53.6B | — | — | 7.8× | 1.9% | 34.5% | -11.4% | -5.6% | -5.6% | — | 1,172 |
| AU | $51.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 537 |
| FNV | $51.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 614 |
| NTR | $37.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 718 |
| STLD | $35.6B | 30.7× | 19.2× | 2.0× | 3.6% | 13.2% | 6.5% | 13.2% | 9.0% | 2.1× | 893 |
| KGC | $34.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 630 |
| VMC | $31.9B | 30.1× | 15.3× | 4.0× | 7.1% | 27.4% | 13.6% | 12.6% | 8.4% | 1.8× | 981 |
| MLM | $29.8B | 26.3× | 16.9× | 4.8× | 8.6% | 30.7% | 18.5% | 11.3% | 7.4% | 2.6× | 1,022 |
| PPG | $23.6B | 15.2× | — | 1.5× | 0.2% | 41.3% | 9.9% | 19.8% | 10.3% | — | 1,003 |
| LPX | $4.6B | 31.6× | — | 1.7× | -7.9% | 21.8% | 5.4% | 8.4% | 7.0% | — | 398 |
Peers = companies sharing LPX's sector (Basic Materials) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.