Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 449 of 5,944 reporting institutions (96th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.74B 100.0% | $4.82B 100.0% | $5.30B 100.0% | $7.44B 100.0% | $6.54B 100.0% | $4.13B 100.0% | $4.08B 100.0% | $4.62B 100.0% | $3.65B 100.0% | $3.17B 100.0% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $230.5M 4.9% | $217.7M 4.5% | $211.8M 4.0% | $221.3M 3.0% | $221.3M 3.4% | $167.6M 4.1% | $159.0M 3.9% | $188.2M 4.1% | $170.6M 4.7% | $143.2M 4.5% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $4.61B 97.1% | $4.59B 95.1% | $4.97B 93.7% | $6.87B 92.4% | $6.03B 92.3% | $3.88B 94.0% | $3.79B 92.8% | $4.29B 92.9% | $3.40B 93.4% | $2.95B 93.0% |
| Operating Income | $151.6M 3.2% | $248.9M 5.2% | $344.1M 6.5% | $571.1M 7.7% | $505.7M 7.7% | $252.9M 6.1% | $298.9M 7.3% | $331.7M 7.2% | $244.0M 6.7% | $223.3M 7.0% |
| Interest Expense | $5.6M 0.1% | $4.1M 0.1% | $3.9M 0.1% | $4.5M 0.1% | $4.0M 0.1% | $4.0M 0.1% | $3.1M 0.1% | $3.4M 0.1% | $3.2M 0.1% | $3.8M 0.1% |
| Pretax Income | $150.6M 3.2% | $254.3M 5.3% | $348.1M 6.6% | $567.5M 7.6% | $501.7M 7.7% | $249.0M 6.0% | $295.8M 7.2% | $328.4M 7.1% | $240.8M 6.6% | $219.5M 6.9% |
| Income Tax Expense | $35.6M 0.7% | $58.4M 1.2% | $83.7M 1.6% | $136.5M 1.8% | $120.2M 1.8% | $56.9M 1.4% | $68.1M 1.7% | $73.2M 1.6% | $63.8M 1.7% | $82.1M 2.6% |
| Net Income | $115.0M 2.4% | $195.9M 4.1% | $264.4M 5.0% | $430.9M 5.8% | $381.5M 5.8% | $192.1M 4.6% | $227.7M 5.6% | $255.3M 5.5% | $177.1M 4.9% | $137.3M 4.3% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $3.31 | $5.51 | $7.36 | $11.76 | $9.98 | $4.98 | $5.72 | $6.19 | $4.22 | $3.26 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $3.31 | $5.51 | $7.36 | $11.76 | $9.98 | $4.98 | $5.72 | $6.18 | $4.21 | $3.25 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 34.7M | 35.5M | 35.9M | 36.6M | 38.2M | 38.6M | 39.8M | 41.3M | 41.9M | 42.1M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 34.7M | 35.5M | 35.9M | 36.6M | 38.2M | 38.6M | 39.8M | 41.3M | 42.0M | 42.2M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $171.14 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 7.6%/yr for a decade (off $280M normalized FCF).
The market's 7.6% is more optimistic than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.03B shares · net debt -$397M
mean 17.9% · volatility σ 70% · implied rate exceeded in 3/9 yrs
Central path = implied 7.6%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (70%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
5/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 58% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $125M dividends + $180M buybacks = $305M returned on $215M FCF.
6 consecutive years of dividend increases · 30%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: 14%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
No material risks flagged.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 25.0× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SG&A | 4.1 | 3.9 | 4.1 | 3.4 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.5 | 4.9 |
| Operating Income | 7.2 | 7.3 | 6.1 | 7.7 | 7.7 | 6.5 | 5.2 | 3.2 |
| Income Tax | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 0.7 |
| Net Income | 5.5 | 5.6 | 4.6 | 5.8 | 5.8 | 5.0 | 4.1 | 2.4 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on LSTR: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Ranked against 651 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTM | $29.49T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 160 |
| CAT | $371.6B | 42.5× | 29.7× | 5.5× | 4.3% | 33.8% | 13.1% | 41.7% | 15.4% | 2.7× | 3,616 |
| GE | $328.8B | 38.5× | — | 7.2× | 18.5% | — | 19.0% | 46.6% | 22.2% | — | 3,077 |
| RTX | $259.8B | 39.0× | 18.5× | 2.9× | 9.7% | — | 7.6% | 10.3% | 10.3% | 0.0× | 3,277 |
| BA | $199.4B | 79.4× | 40.2× | 2.2× | 34.5% | 4.8% | 2.5% | 41.0% | 3.3% | 10.0× | 2,435 |
| DE | $185.4B | 37.1× | — | 4.1× | -11.7% | — | 11.0% | 19.4% | 12.6% | — | 2,491 |
| ABBNY | $177.4B | 47.9× | 31.6× | 5.5× | 9.5% | 34.8% | 11.9% | 28.5% | 20.4% | 0.9× | 48 |
| UNP | $167.6B | 23.6× | 16.1× | 6.8× | 1.1% | — | 29.1% | 38.7% | 14.2% | 2.6× | 2,648 |
| ETN | $158.8B | 39.2× | — | 5.8× | 10.3% | 37.6% | 14.9% | 21.0% | 13.9% | — | 2,398 |
| HON | $131.2B | 28.1× | 16.1× | 3.5× | 7.8% | 36.9% | 12.6% | 34.0% | 9.8% | 3.6× | 2,694 |
| LMT | $123.2B | 25.0× | 16.1× | 1.6× | 5.6% | 10.2% | 6.7% | 74.6% | 17.7% | 2.5× | 2,807 |
| PH | $118.7B | 34.1× | 26.8× | 6.0× | -0.4% | 36.9% | 17.8% | 25.8% | 16.7% | 1.6× | 1,845 |
| ADP | $108.3B | 24.9× | — | 4.9× | 6.7% | 46.4% | 20.1% | 73.2% | 40.1% | — | 2,179 |
| GD | $96.2B | 23.0× | 16.9× | 1.8× | 10.1% | — | 8.0% | 16.4% | 12.5% | 1.3× | 2,123 |
| TT | $94.4B | 32.6× | 23.3× | 4.4× | 7.5% | — | 13.7% | 34.0% | 22.1% | 1.1× | 1,658 |
| VRT | $92.4B | 70.8× | 43.8× | 9.0× | 27.7% | 36.3% | 13.0% | 33.8% | 19.4% | 1.4× | 1,748 |
| PWR | $92.2B | 90.7× | 45.8× | 3.2× | 20.3% | 15.0% | 3.6% | 11.5% | 10.6% | 0.4× | 1,659 |
| JCI | $91.9B | 28.0× | — | 3.9× | 2.8% | 36.4% | 13.9% | 25.5% | 14.4% | — | 1,487 |
| HWM | $90.7B | 60.9× | 39.9× | 11.0× | 11.1% | — | 18.3% | 28.2% | 17.9% | 1.3× | 1,399 |
| CSX | $89.1B | 31.1× | 14.4× | 6.3× | -3.1% | — | 20.5% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 1,791 |
| MMM | $87.3B | 27.4× | 16.8× | 3.5× | 1.5% | 39.9% | 13.0% | 69.1% | 18.8% | 2.1× | 2,051 |
| WM | $86.0B | 31.8× | 12.1× | 3.4× | 14.2% | 40.4% | 10.7% | 27.1% | 25.3% | 0.1× | 2,262 |
| UPS | $85.0B | 15.3× | 9.5× | 1.0× | -2.6% | — | 6.3% | 34.3% | 13.8% | 2.2× | 2,025 |
| EMR | $83.0B | 36.5× | — | 4.6× | 3.0% | 52.8% | 12.7% | 11.3% | 6.9% | — | 2,112 |
| CTAS | $79.8B | 45.0× | 28.7× | 7.7× | 7.7% | 50.0% | 17.5% | 38.7% | 25.5% | 0.8× | 1,366 |
| LSTR | $5.9B | 51.7× | — | 1.3× | -1.6% | — | 2.4% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 449 |
Peers = companies sharing LSTR's sector (Industrials) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.