Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional distribution: ownership decreased -2.13% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
This company doesn't have positive free cash flow, so a reverse DCF can't be run.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
3/7 of the 9 checks — 2 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 7 with data.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Interest last disclosed in FY2017 (no longer broken out).
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-18
No standout strengths flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 15th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Operating leverage needs meaningful revenue change.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on LTBR: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-18
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | — | $175K 100.0% | $761K 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $107K 61.0% | $457K 60.0% |
| Gross Profit | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $68K 39.0% | $304K 40.0% |
| Research & Development | $9.2M | $4.6M | $1.9M | $670K | $1.4M | $892K | $2.7M | $3.5M | $2.3M 1301.2% | $2.7M 361.3% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $14.0M | $8.5M | $7.1M | $7.5M | $7.2M | $8.3M | $5.8M | $6.7M | $4.4M 2498.2% | $5.2M 682.4% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $23.2M | $13.1M | $9.1M | $8.2M | $8.5M | $14.6M | $8.5M | $10.2M | $6.7M 3799.5% | $7.9M 1043.8% |
| Operating Income | -$23.2M | -$13.1M | -$9.0M | -$7.8M | -$7.9M | -$14.5M | -$11.1M | -$15.0M | -$6.6M -3760.5% | -$7.6M -1003.8% |
| Interest Expense | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $16K 9.2% | $29K 3.9% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $3.6M | $1.3M | $1.1M | $289K | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $3.6M | $1.3M | $1.1M | $289K | $42K | $84K | -$2.6M | -$724K | -$507K -289.1% | $1.3M 169.6% |
| Pretax Income | -$19.6M | -$11.8M | -$7.9M | -$7.5M | -$7.8M | -$14.4M | -$10.7M | -$15.7M | -$7.1M -4049.6% | -$6.3M -834.3% |
| Income Tax Expense | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | — | — | $0 0.0% |
| Net Income | -$19.6M | -$11.8M | -$7.9M | -$7.5M | -$7.8M | -$14.4M | -$10.7M | -$15.7M | -$7.1M -4049.6% | -$6.3M -834.3% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | — | — | — | $-0.69 | $-1.71 | $-3.59 | $-3.66 | — | — | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | — | $-0.81 | $-0.65 | $-0.69 | $-1.71 | $-3.59 | $-3.66 | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | — | — | — | 10.8M | 7.0M | 4.2M | 3.1M | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 24.5M | 14.5M | 12.1M | — | 7.0M | 4.2M | 3.1M | 2.2M | 10.4M | 4.7M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Ranked against 651 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTM | $29.37T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 160 |
| CAT | $376.4B | 43.0× | 30.0× | 5.6× | 4.3% | 33.8% | 13.1% | 41.7% | 15.4% | 2.7× | 3,616 |
| GE | $329.6B | 38.6× | — | 7.2× | 18.5% | — | 19.0% | 46.6% | 22.2% | — | 3,077 |
| RTX | $260.4B | 39.1× | 18.5× | 2.9× | 9.7% | — | 7.6% | 10.3% | 10.3% | 0.0× | 3,277 |
| BA | $200.6B | 79.9× | 40.4× | 2.2× | 34.5% | 4.8% | 2.5% | 41.0% | 3.3% | 10.0× | 2,435 |
| DE | $185.0B | 37.0× | — | 4.0× | -11.7% | — | 11.0% | 19.4% | 12.6% | — | 2,491 |
| ABBNY | $179.9B | 48.6× | 32.1× | 5.6× | 9.5% | 34.8% | 11.9% | 28.5% | 20.4% | 0.9× | 48 |
| UNP | $165.7B | 23.3× | 15.9× | 6.8× | 1.1% | — | 29.1% | 38.7% | 14.2% | 2.6× | 2,648 |
| ETN | $164.8B | 40.6× | — | 6.0× | 10.3% | 37.6% | 14.9% | 21.0% | 13.9% | — | 2,398 |
| HON | $131.2B | 28.1× | 16.1× | 3.5× | 7.8% | 36.9% | 12.6% | 34.0% | 9.8% | 3.6× | 2,694 |
| LMT | $122.1B | 24.8× | 16.0× | 1.6× | 5.6% | 10.2% | 6.7% | 74.6% | 17.7% | 2.5× | 2,807 |
| PH | $121.1B | 34.8× | 27.3× | 6.1× | -0.4% | 36.9% | 17.8% | 25.8% | 16.7% | 1.6× | 1,845 |
| ADP | $107.9B | 24.8× | — | 4.9× | 6.7% | 46.4% | 20.1% | 73.2% | 40.1% | — | 2,179 |
| TT | $95.7B | 33.1× | 23.6× | 4.5× | 7.5% | — | 13.7% | 34.0% | 22.1% | 1.1× | 1,658 |
| GD | $95.5B | 22.9× | 16.8× | 1.8× | 10.1% | — | 8.0% | 16.4% | 12.5% | 1.3× | 2,123 |
| VRT | $95.4B | 73.1× | 45.2× | 9.3× | 27.7% | 36.3% | 13.0% | 33.8% | 19.4% | 1.4× | 1,748 |
| PWR | $95.2B | 93.6× | 47.2× | 3.3× | 20.3% | 15.0% | 3.6% | 11.5% | 10.6% | 0.4× | 1,659 |
| JCI | $93.4B | 28.5× | — | 4.0× | 2.8% | 36.4% | 13.9% | 25.5% | 14.4% | — | 1,487 |
| HWM | $92.2B | 61.9× | 40.6× | 11.2× | 11.1% | — | 18.3% | 28.2% | 17.9% | 1.3× | 1,399 |
| MMM | $88.0B | 27.6× | 16.9× | 3.5× | 1.5% | 39.9% | 13.0% | 69.1% | 18.8% | 2.1× | 2,051 |
| CSX | $87.6B | 30.6× | 14.1× | 6.2× | -3.1% | — | 20.5% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 1,791 |
| WM | $85.1B | 31.5× | 11.9× | 3.4× | 14.2% | 40.4% | 10.7% | 27.1% | 25.3% | 0.1× | 2,262 |
| EMR | $84.4B | 37.1× | — | 4.7× | 3.0% | 52.8% | 12.7% | 11.3% | 6.9% | — | 2,112 |
| UPS | $84.1B | 15.1× | 9.4× | 0.9× | -2.6% | — | 6.3% | 34.3% | 13.8% | 2.2× | 2,025 |
| CTAS | $79.6B | 44.9× | 28.7× | 7.7× | 7.7% | 50.0% | 17.5% | 38.7% | 25.5% | 0.8× | 1,366 |
| LTBR | $218M | — | — | — | — | — | — | -9.6% | -9.6% | — | 132 |
Peers = companies sharing LTBR's sector (Industrials) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.