Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Strong institutional distribution: ownership decreased -3.43% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $23.63 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds -10.3%/yr for a decade (off $79M normalized FCF).
The market's -10.3% is more conservative than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.02B shares · net debt -$19M
mean 11.1% · volatility σ 64% · implied rate exceeded in 6/8 yrs
Central path = implied -10.3%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (64%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Ranked against 490 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN | $2.70T | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.5% | 16.2% | — | 5,764 |
| TSLA | $1.37T | 339.1× | 145.5× | 14.5× | -2.9% | 18.0% | 4.0% | 4.6% | 4.2% | 0.9× | 4,029 |
| TM | $614.2B | 60.0× | 24.8× | 2.6× | 3.8% | 18.4% | 4.4% | 7.9% | 5.9% | 1.7× | 665 |
| PDD | $442.6B | 32.9× | 31.9× | 7.2× | 14.5% | 56.3% | 22.7% | 23.7% | 23.7% | — | 548 |
| HD | $301.3B | 21.3× | 14.3× | 1.8× | 3.2% | 33.3% | 8.6% | 110% | 22.8% | 2.0× | 3,970 |
| BABA | $201.7B | 135.7× | — | 1.4× | 8.1% | 39.8% | 10.1% | 9.8% | 9.8% | — | 1,298 |
| TJX | $140.1B | 26.0× | — | 2.3× | 7.1% | 31.0% | 9.1% | 53.9% | 42.1% | — | 2,608 |
| HTHT | $132.7B | 187.9× | 114.3× | — | — | — | — | 39.7% | 27.3% | 0.7× | 258 |
| SBUX | $109.9B | 59.3× | 26.8× | 3.0× | 2.8% | — | 5.0% | -22.9% | 23.3% | 3.4× | 2,252 |
| LOW | $108.9B | 16.4× | 12.0× | 1.3× | 3.1% | 33.5% | 7.7% | -67.1% | 22.3% | 3.2× | 2,591 |
| ABNB | $101.7B | — | 37.9× | 8.3× | 10.3% | 83.0% | 20.5% | 30.6% | 24.6% | 0.8× | 1,246 |
| MELI | $92.5B | 46.3× | — | 3.2× | 39.1% | 44.5% | 6.9% | 29.6% | 12.5% | — | 1,380 |
| MAR | $88.8B | 35.1× | 20.6× | 3.4× | 4.3% | — | 9.9% | -69.0% | -69.4% | 0.0× | 1,559 |
| LKNCY | $86.3B | 168.2× | 90.8× | 12.3× | 48.9% | — | 7.3% | 23.0% | 23.0% | — | 9 |
| GM | $78.3B | 26.5× | 3.9× | 0.4× | -1.3% | — | 1.5% | 4.4% | 4.4% | — | 1,447 |
| ROST | $74.0B | 34.7× | 22.0× | 3.3× | 7.7% | 27.7% | 9.4% | 34.7% | 27.8% | 0.5× | 1,276 |
| ORLY | $71.5B | 28.6× | 19.5× | 4.0× | 6.4% | 51.6% | 14.3% | -333% | 48.3% | 1.5× | 1,569 |
| HLT | $69.7B | 49.4× | 24.0× | 5.8× | 7.7% | — | 12.1% | -27.0% | -27.0% | — | 1,126 |
| RCL | $67.7B | 16.0× | — | 3.8× | 8.8% | 49.4% | 23.8% | 42.5% | 32.3% | — | 1,114 |
| SE | $62.0B | 40.2× | 24.6× | 2.7× | 36.4% | 44.7% | 6.9% | 12.6% | 12.6% | — | 718 |
| F | $54.2B | — | 4.5× | 0.3× | 1.2% | 6.8% | -4.4% | -22.7% | -22.7% | — | — |
| NKE | $53.9B | 17.3× | — | 1.2× | 0.2% | 42.9% | 6.7% | 20.9% | 13.6% | — | 1,848 |
| EBAY | $50.7B | 26.0× | 18.4× | 4.6× | 7.9% | 71.5% | 18.3% | 45.3% | 38.8% | 0.3× | 1,182 |
| AZO | $47.8B | 19.6× | 13.3× | 2.5× | 2.4% | 52.6% | 13.2% | -73.2% | 46.4% | 2.1× | 1,245 |
| CMG | $44.8B | 29.4× | 19.4× | 3.8× | 5.4% | — | 12.9% | 54.3% | 54.3% | 0.0× | 1,203 |
| MBUU | $465M | 31.1× | 8.3× | 0.6× | -2.6% | 17.8% | 1.8% | 2.9% | 2.8% | 0.3× | 125 |
Peers = companies sharing MBUU's sector (Consumer Cyclical) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $36M buybacks = $36M returned on $29M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: 3%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit. Effective rate ~10.5% on $18M of debt.
Cash of $37M fully covers short-term debt of $0.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 12-yr range · 32th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 12-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 53.6× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 75.8 | 75.7 | 77.1 | 74.5 | 74.5 | 74.7 | 82.3 | 82.2 |
| Gross Profit | 24.2 | 24.3 | 22.9 | 25.5 | 25.5 | 25.3 | 17.7 | 17.8 |
| SG&A | 6.3 | 6.5 | 6.1 | 6.7 | 5.5 | 12.7 | 9.2 | 11.4 |
| Operating Income | 14.1 | 14.3 | 13.1 | 16.2 | 17.6 | 10.4 | -6.7 | 2.7 |
| Income Tax | 11.8 | 3.2 | 2.9 | 3.7 | 3.8 | 2.4 | -0.2 | 0.6 |
| Net Income | 5.6 | 9.7 | 9.4 | 11.9 | 13.0 | 7.5 | -6.7 | 1.8 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on MBUU: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $807.6M 100.0% | $829.0M 100.0% | $1.39B 100.0% | $1.21B 100.0% | $926.5M 100.0% | $653.2M 100.0% | $684.0M 100.0% | $497.0M 100.0% | $281.9M 100.0% | $253.0M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $663.5M 82.2% | $681.9M 82.3% | $1.04B 74.7% | $904.8M 74.5% | $690.0M 74.5% | $503.9M 77.1% | $517.7M 75.7% | $376.7M 75.8% | $206.9M 73.4% | $186.1M 73.6% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $206.9M 73.4% | $186.1M 73.6% |
| Gross Profit | $144.1M 17.8% | $147.1M 17.7% | $351.3M 25.3% | $310.1M 25.5% | $236.5M 25.5% | $149.3M 22.9% | $166.3M 24.3% | $120.3M 24.2% | $75.0M 26.6% | $66.8M 26.4% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $92.5M 11.4% | $76.3M 9.2% | $175.7M 12.7% | $66.4M 5.5% | $61.9M 6.7% | $39.9M 6.1% | $44.3M 6.5% | $31.4M 6.3% | $24.8M 8.8% | $21.3M 8.4% |
| Operating Income | $21.8M 2.7% | -$55.9M -6.7% | $144.8M 10.4% | $213.8M 17.6% | $149.8M 16.2% | $85.3M 13.1% | $98.1M 14.3% | $70.1M 14.1% | $39.4M 14.0% | $35.9M 14.2% |
| Interest Expense | $1.9M 0.2% | $1.8M 0.2% | $3.0M 0.2% | $2.9M 0.2% | $2.5M 0.3% | $3.9M 0.6% | $6.5M 0.9% | $5.4M 1.1% | $1.6M 0.6% | $3.9M 1.5% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$1.5M -0.2% | -$1.8M -0.2% | -$3.3M -0.2% | -$3.9M -0.3% | -$1.5M -0.2% | -$1.6M -0.2% | -$6.3M -0.9% | $19.3M 3.9% | $9.2M 3.3% | -$3.8M -1.5% |
| Pretax Income | $20.3M 2.5% | -$57.8M -7.0% | $141.5M 10.2% | $210.0M 17.3% | $148.3M 16.0% | $83.7M 12.8% | $91.8M 13.4% | $89.4M 18.0% | $48.7M 17.3% | $32.1M 12.7% |
| Income Tax Expense | $5.0M 0.6% | -$1.3M -0.2% | $33.6M 2.4% | $46.5M 3.8% | $34.0M 3.7% | $19.1M 2.9% | $22.1M 3.2% | $58.4M 11.8% | $17.6M 6.2% | $11.8M 4.7% |
| Net Income | $14.9M 1.8% | -$55.9M -6.7% | $104.5M 7.5% | $157.6M 13.0% | $109.8M 11.9% | $61.6M 9.4% | $66.1M 9.7% | $27.6M 5.6% | $28.4M 10.1% | $18.0M 7.1% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $0.76 | $-2.74 | $5.10 | $7.60 | $5.29 | $2.98 | $3.17 | $1.37 | $1.59 | $1.01 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $0.76 | $-2.74 | $5.06 | $7.51 | $5.23 | $2.95 | $3.15 | $1.36 | $1.58 | $1.00 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 19.7M | 20.4M | 20.5M | 20.7M | 20.8M | 20.7M | 20.8M | 20.2M | 17.8M | 17.9M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 19.7M | 20.4M | 20.6M | 21.0M | 21.0M | 20.9M | 21.0M | 20.3M | 18.0M | 18.0M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.