Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 204 of 5,944 reporting institutions (92th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $9.81 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds -2.4%/yr for a decade (off $68M normalized FCF).
2-stage DCF · 0.06B shares (market data) · net debt $27M
mean -10.1% · volatility σ 156% · implied rate exceeded in 2/4 yrs
Central path = implied -2.4%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (156%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
No trend data available for this metric.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
3/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
Free-cash-flow coverage unavailable. Last year: $4M dividends + $0 buybacks = $4M returned on -$61M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -5%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $440M covers the $56000 due within a year 7863.3× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-12-31 (10-K/A).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~1.7% on $468M of debt.
Cash of $440M fully covers short-term debt of $56000.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $536.6M 100.0% | $666.3M 100.0% | $693.5M 100.0% | $565.7M 100.0% | $283.4M 100.0% | $168.9M 100.0% | $168.9M 100.0% | $227.6M 100.0% | $61.0M 100.0% | $5.2M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $453.4M 84.5% | $533.3M 80.0% | $493.8M 71.2% | $333.0M 58.9% | $195.4M 69.0% | $145.5M 86.1% | $162.5M 96.2% | $176.6M 77.6% | $60.5M 99.2% | $1.8M 34.4% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $58.3M 95.5% | $1.8M 34.4% |
| Cost of Services | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $2.2M 3.6% | $2.6M 49.9% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $69.4M 12.9% | $49.3M 7.4% | $48.8M 7.0% | $40.0M 7.1% | $21.6M 7.6% | $21.0M 12.4% | $18.2M 10.8% | $14.0M 6.2% | $12.6M 20.6% | $7.5M 142.9% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $592.6M 110.4% | $649.7M 97.5% | $598.3M 86.3% | $415.3M 73.4% | $243.9M 86.1% | $188.0M 111.3% | $200.7M 118.8% | $203.5M 89.4% | $76.9M 126.0% | $12.7M 244.4% |
| Operating Income | -$56.0M -10.4% | $16.6M 2.5% | $95.2M 13.7% | $150.4M 26.6% | $39.5M 13.9% | -$19.1M -11.3% | $29.5M 17.5% | $24.1M 10.6% | -$15.9M -26.0% | -$7.5M -144.4% |
| Interest Expense | -$7.8M -1.5% | -$6.1M -0.9% | -$8.9M -1.3% | — | $2.6M 0.9% | $1.2M 0.7% | $1.2M 0.7% | $1.4M 0.6% | $23K 0.0% | $124K 2.4% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$5.6M -1.0% | -$1.7M -0.3% | -$4.0M -0.6% | $2.6M 0.5% | $7.4M 2.6% | $11.9M 7.1% | $1.8M 1.0% | $2.5M 1.1% | $204K 0.3% | — |
| Pretax Income | -$62.1M -11.6% | $14.9M 2.2% | $104.7M 15.1% | $146.2M 25.8% | $44.4M 15.7% | -$8.4M -5.0% | $30.1M 17.8% | $25.2M 11.1% | -$15.4M -25.3% | -$7.5M -144.1% |
| Income Tax Expense | -$10.7M -2.0% | $3.7M 0.6% | $22.4M 3.2% | $30.2M 5.3% | $4.6M 1.6% | -$3.5M -2.1% | $5.2M 3.1% | $113K 0.0% | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% |
| Net Income | -$51.4M -9.6% | $11.2M 1.7% | $82.3M 11.9% | $116.0M 20.5% | $39.8M 14.0% | -$4.9M -2.9% | $24.9M 14.8% | $25.1M 11.0% | -$15.4M -25.3% | -$7.5M -144.1% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-0.99 | $0.11 | $1.77 | $2.63 | $0.90 | $-0.12 | $0.61 | $0.63 | $-0.41 | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-0.99 | $0.11 | $1.73 | $2.60 | $0.90 | $-0.12 | $0.61 | $0.62 | $-0.41 | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | — | — | — | 44.2M | 44.0M | 42.5M | 40.8M | 40.0M | 37.6M | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | — | — | — | 44.7M | 44.3M | 42.5M | 40.8M | 40.3M | 37.6M | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Where each multiple sits in its own 9-yr range
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 9-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 22.4× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 77.6 | 96.2 | 86.1 | 69.0 | 58.9 | 71.2 | 80.0 | 84.5 |
| SG&A | 6.2 | 10.8 | 12.4 | 7.6 | 7.1 | 7.0 | 7.4 | 12.9 |
| Operating Income | 10.6 | 17.5 | -11.3 | 13.9 | 26.6 | 13.7 | 2.5 | -10.4 |
| Income Tax | 0.0 | 3.1 | -2.1 | 1.6 | 5.3 | 3.2 | 0.6 | -2.0 |
| Net Income | 11.0 | 14.8 | -2.9 | 14.0 | 20.5 | 11.9 | 1.7 | -9.6 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on METC: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 238 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XOM | $682.3B | 24.4× | — | 2.0× | -5.0% | — | 8.7% | 11.1% | 10.7% | — | 4,568 |
| SHEL | $545.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,521 |
| CVX | $391.2B | 31.9× | — | 2.1× | -6.8% | 42.8% | 6.5% | 6.6% | 6.6% | — | 4,121 |
| TTE | $202.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 951 |
| COP | $166.8B | 21.0× | — | 2.8× | 7.7% | 62.1% | 13.6% | 12.4% | 12.2% | — | 2,450 |
| PBR | $155.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 524 |
| MPC | $128.7B | 31.9× | 11.0× | 1.0× | -4.4% | 10.0% | 3.0% | 23.4% | 20.6% | 0.2× | 1,802 |
| VLO | $127.5B | 54.5× | 24.1× | 1.0× | -5.5% | 4.4% | 1.9% | 9.9% | 7.1% | 1.7× | 1,781 |
| BP | $117.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,220 |
| PSX | $111.3B | 25.4× | — | 0.8× | -7.5% | 12.3% | 3.3% | 15.1% | 14.6% | — | 2,041 |
| EQNR | $110.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 398 |
| WMB | $87.7B | 33.6× | 17.8× | 7.3× | 13.8% | — | 21.9% | 20.4% | 6.3% | 4.4× | 1,736 |
| EPD | $84.1B | — | 12.6× | 1.6× | -6.4% | 26.7% | 11.0% | — | — | 3.7× | 1,573 |
| EOG | $79.0B | 15.9× | 7.7× | 3.5× | -4.5% | — | 22.0% | 16.7% | 13.2% | 0.7× | 1,525 |
| SLB | $77.9B | 22.2× | — | 2.2× | -1.6% | — | 9.4% | 12.9% | 9.4% | — | 1,624 |
| ET | $72.5B | — | 9.8× | 0.8× | 3.5% | 25.8% | 5.2% | 9.0% | 3.8% | 4.8× | 1,244 |
| KMI | $69.7B | 22.9× | 14.2× | 4.1× | 12.2% | — | 18.0% | 9.8% | 4.8% | 4.5× | 1,745 |
| TRGP | $61.2B | 33.6× | 16.2× | 3.6× | 3.9% | 38.3% | 11.3% | 62.7% | 9.4% | 3.6× | 979 |
| TS | $60.6B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 248 |
| MPLX | $59.4B | — | — | 4.6× | 8.9% | — | 38.1% | — | — | — | 622 |
| LNG | $59.3B | 11.2× | 7.8× | 3.0× | 27.2% | — | 26.7% | 67.3% | 17.3% | 2.2× | 1,303 |
| OKE | $58.7B | 17.2× | 12.4× | 1.8× | 55.0% | 30.5% | 10.1% | 15.1% | 6.3% | 4.4× | 1,622 |
| OXY | $58.5B | 36.8× | — | 2.7× | -1.9% | — | 11.0% | 6.6% | 4.2% | — | 1,250 |
| BKR | $56.2B | — | — | 2.0× | -0.3% | — | 9.3% | 13.7% | 13.3% | — | 1,095 |
| FANG | $56.0B | 34.4× | 11.2× | 3.7× | 35.8% | — | 11.1% | 4.5% | 3.2% | 2.3× | 1,141 |
| METC | $625M | — | 53.5× | 1.2× | -19.5% | 15.5% | -9.6% | -10.6% | -5.4% | 38.3× | 204 |
Peers = companies sharing METC's sector (Energy) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.