Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 243 of 5,944 reporting institutions (93th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $111.58 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 2.6%/yr for a decade (off $199M normalized FCF).
The market's 2.6% is more conservative than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.02B shares · net debt -$295000
mean 53.8% · volatility σ 189% · implied rate exceeded in 4/9 yrs
Central path = implied 2.6%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (189%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
6/7 of the 9 checks — 2 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 7 with data.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 23% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $48M dividends + $0 buybacks = $48M returned on $211M FCF.
9 consecutive years of dividend increases · 7%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 13%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $295000 covers the $0 due within a year 295000.0× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2012-12-31 (10-K).
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $944.2M 100.0% | $910.9M 100.0% | $831.8M 100.0% | $635.7M 100.0% | $534.6M 100.0% | $572.6M 100.0% | $570.2M 100.0% | $498.3M 100.0% | $462.0M 100.0% | $424.1M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $489.3M 51.8% | $475.5M 52.2% | $438.2M 52.7% | $345.5M 54.3% | $287.3M 53.7% | $308.8M 53.9% | $304.1M 53.3% | $265.1M 53.2% | $255.7M 55.3% | $239.9M 56.6% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $60.3M 13.0% | $48.5M 11.4% |
| Gross Profit | $455.0M 48.2% | $435.4M 47.8% | $393.6M 47.3% | $290.2M 45.7% | $247.3M 46.3% | $263.7M 46.1% | $266.2M 46.7% | $233.3M 46.8% | $206.3M 44.7% | $184.2M 43.4% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $211.4M 22.4% | $200.4M 22.0% | $207.5M 24.9% | $142.9M 22.5% | $123.1M 23.0% | $123.0M 21.5% | $124.8M 21.9% | $115.8M 23.2% | $111.6M 24.2% | $104.9M 24.7% |
| Operating Income | $243.6M 25.8% | $244.3M 26.8% | $189.7M 22.8% | $147.3M 23.2% | $124.3M 23.2% | $140.8M 24.6% | $141.4M 24.8% | $117.5M 23.6% | $94.7M 20.5% | $79.3M 18.7% |
| Interest Expense | $30.6M 3.2% | $47.2M 5.2% | $40.6M 4.9% | $12.2M 1.9% | $8.2M 1.5% | $8.8M 1.5% | $12.3M 2.2% | $12.3M 2.5% | $11.6M 2.5% | $12.2M 2.9% |
| Pretax Income | $213.1M 22.6% | $313.6M 34.4% | $149.5M 18.0% | $134.7M 21.2% | $115.8M 21.7% | $132.0M 23.1% | $129.1M 22.6% | $104.7M 21.0% | $83.5M 18.1% | $66.9M 15.8% |
| Income Tax Expense | $56.8M 6.0% | $81.9M 9.0% | $37.6M 4.5% | $31.4M 4.9% | $30.7M 5.7% | $30.1M 5.3% | $32.3M 5.7% | $25.3M 5.1% | -$70.5M -15.3% | $28.7M 6.8% |
| Net Income | $156.3M 16.6% | $231.7M 25.4% | $174.6M 21.0% | $115.1M 18.1% | $89.7M 16.8% | $102.0M 17.8% | $96.8M 17.0% | $79.4M 15.9% | $153.9M 33.3% | $38.3M 9.0% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $6.35 | $9.44 | $7.14 | $4.73 | $3.70 | $4.22 | $3.99 | $3.29 | $6.41 | $1.60 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $6.35 | $9.43 | $7.12 | $4.70 | $3.66 | $4.16 | $3.93 | $3.24 | $6.34 | $1.60 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 24.6M | 24.5M | 24.5M | 24.4M | 24.2M | 24.2M | 24.3M | 24.1M | 24.0M | 23.9M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 24.6M | 24.6M | 24.5M | 24.5M | 24.5M | 24.5M | 24.6M | 24.5M | 24.3M | 24.0M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Nothing notable to watch.
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 75th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 53.2 | 53.3 | 53.9 | 53.7 | 54.3 | 52.7 | 52.2 | 51.8 |
| Gross Profit | 46.8 | 46.7 | 46.1 | 46.3 | 45.7 | 47.3 | 47.8 | 48.2 |
| SG&A | 23.2 | 21.9 | 21.5 | 23.0 | 22.5 | 24.9 | 22.0 | 22.4 |
| Operating Income | 23.6 | 24.8 | 24.6 | 23.2 | 23.2 | 22.8 | 26.8 | 25.8 |
| Income Tax | 5.1 | 5.7 | 5.3 | 5.7 | 4.9 | 4.5 | 9.0 | 6.0 |
| Net Income | 15.9 | 17.0 | 17.8 | 16.8 | 18.1 | 21.0 | 25.4 | 16.6 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on MGRC: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 651 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTM | $28.75T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 160 |
| CAT | $364.2B | 41.6× | 29.1× | 5.4× | 4.3% | 33.8% | 13.1% | 41.7% | 15.4% | 2.7× | 3,616 |
| GE | $328.2B | 38.4× | — | 7.2× | 18.5% | — | 19.0% | 46.6% | 22.2% | — | 3,077 |
| RTX | $264.2B | 39.7× | 18.8× | 3.0× | 9.7% | — | 7.6% | 10.3% | 10.3% | 0.0× | 3,277 |
| BA | $204.4B | 81.4× | 41.0× | 2.3× | 34.5% | 4.8% | 2.5% | 41.0% | 3.3% | 10.0× | 2,435 |
| DE | $181.0B | 36.2× | — | 4.0× | -11.7% | — | 11.0% | 19.4% | 12.6% | — | 2,491 |
| ABBNY | $174.3B | 47.1× | 31.1× | 5.4× | 9.5% | 34.8% | 11.9% | 28.5% | 20.4% | 0.9× | 48 |
| UNP | $166.7B | 23.4× | 16.0× | 6.8× | 1.1% | — | 29.1% | 38.7% | 14.2% | 2.6× | 2,648 |
| ETN | $154.3B | 38.1× | — | 5.6× | 10.3% | 37.6% | 14.9% | 21.0% | 13.9% | — | 2,398 |
| HON | $131.9B | 28.2× | 16.2× | 3.5× | 7.8% | 36.9% | 12.6% | 34.0% | 9.8% | 3.6× | 2,694 |
| LMT | $123.0B | 25.0× | 16.1× | 1.6× | 5.6% | 10.2% | 6.7% | 74.6% | 17.7% | 2.5× | 2,807 |
| PH | $117.9B | 33.9× | 26.6× | 5.9× | -0.4% | 36.9% | 17.8% | 25.8% | 16.7% | 1.6× | 1,845 |
| ADP | $108.7B | 25.0× | — | 5.0× | 6.7% | 46.4% | 20.1% | 73.2% | 40.1% | — | 2,179 |
| GD | $97.3B | 23.3× | 17.1× | 1.9× | 10.1% | — | 8.0% | 16.4% | 12.5% | 1.3× | 2,123 |
| TT | $94.0B | 32.5× | 23.2× | 4.4× | 7.5% | — | 13.7% | 34.0% | 22.1% | 1.1× | 1,658 |
| PWR | $92.6B | 91.1× | 46.0× | 3.3× | 20.3% | 15.0% | 3.6% | 11.5% | 10.6% | 0.4× | 1,659 |
| VRT | $91.6B | 70.2× | 43.4× | 8.9× | 27.7% | 36.3% | 13.0% | 33.8% | 19.4% | 1.4× | 1,748 |
| JCI | $91.6B | 27.9× | — | 3.9× | 2.8% | 36.4% | 13.9% | 25.5% | 14.4% | — | 1,487 |
| HWM | $91.5B | 61.4× | 40.3× | 11.1× | 11.1% | — | 18.3% | 28.2% | 17.9% | 1.3× | 1,399 |
| CSX | $89.1B | 31.1× | 14.4× | 6.3× | -3.1% | — | 20.5% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 1,791 |
| MMM | $86.2B | 27.1× | 16.6× | 3.5× | 1.5% | 39.9% | 13.0% | 69.1% | 18.8% | 2.1× | 2,051 |
| WM | $86.2B | 31.9× | 12.1× | 3.4× | 14.2% | 40.4% | 10.7% | 27.1% | 25.3% | 0.1× | 2,262 |
| UPS | $83.9B | 15.1× | 9.4× | 0.9× | -2.6% | — | 6.3% | 34.3% | 13.8% | 2.2× | 2,025 |
| EMR | $82.1B | 36.1× | — | 4.6× | 3.0% | 52.8% | 12.7% | 11.3% | 6.9% | — | 2,112 |
| CTAS | $80.4B | 45.3× | 28.9× | 7.8× | 7.7% | 50.0% | 17.5% | 38.7% | 25.5% | 0.8× | 1,366 |
| MGRC | $2.7B | 17.5× | 7.8× | 2.9× | 3.7% | 48.2% | 16.6% | 12.6% | 12.6% | — | 243 |
Peers = companies sharing MGRC's sector (Industrials) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.