Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional distribution: ownership decreased -1.41% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
A reverse DCF cannot be solved for MOMO: its net cash ($760M) exceeds its market value, so enterprise value is negative. Discounting a positive cash-flow stream always gives a positive number, so no growth rate reaches that target. This is common for banks, brokers and payment companies, where customer balances sit in the cash line and are not the company's to spend.
2-stage DCF · 0.14B shares (market data) · net debt -$760M
mean -10.5% · volatility σ 47% · implied rate exceeded in 7/7 yrs
Central path = implied -60.0%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (47%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.48B 100.0% | $10.56B 100.0% | $12.00B 100.0% | $12.70B 100.0% | $14.58B 100.0% | $15.02B 100.0% | $17.02B 100.0% | $13.41B 100.0% | $1.32B 100.0% | $553.1M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $921.9M 62.2% | $6.45B 61.0% | $7.03B 58.5% | $7.42B 58.4% | $8.38B 57.5% | $7.98B 53.1% | $8.49B 49.9% | $7.18B 53.6% | $4.37B 331.8% | $1.62B 292.8% |
| Research & Development | — | — | — | — | $1.13B 7.8% | $1.17B 7.8% | $1.10B 6.4% | $760.6M 5.7% | $346.1M 26.3% | $208.6M 37.7% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $65.1M 4.4% | $507.7M 4.8% | $502.5M 4.2% | $596.0M 4.7% | $624.7M 4.3% | $763.1M 5.1% | $1.53B 9.0% | $640.0M 4.8% | $422.0M 32.0% | $259.7M 47.0% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $1.29B 87.3% | $9.09B 86.0% | $9.83B 81.9% | $11.10B 87.4% | $17.14B 117.6% | $12.72B 84.7% | $13.81B 81.1% | $10.40B 77.5% | $6.61B 501.3% | $2.73B 494.5% |
| Operating Income | $193.7M 13.1% | $1.53B 14.5% | $2.31B 19.2% | $1.63B 12.8% | -$2.39B -16.4% | $2.53B 16.8% | $3.55B 20.9% | $3.27B 24.4% | $2.43B 184.7% | $975.1M 176.3% |
| Interest Expense | $10.4M 0.7% | $127.8M 1.2% | $62.2M 0.5% | $83.5M 0.7% | $73.8M 0.5% | $78.9M 0.5% | $78.6M 0.5% | $56.5M 0.4% | — | — |
| Interest & Investment Income | $53.5M 3.6% | $511.0M 4.8% | $436.3M 3.6% | $368.9M 2.9% | $384.3M 2.6% | $444.5M 3.0% | $407.5M 2.4% | $272.9M 2.0% | $145.6M 11.0% | $54.6M 9.9% |
| Pretax Income | $237.7M 16.0% | $1.83B 17.3% | $2.65B 22.1% | $2.03B 16.0% | -$2.10B -14.4% | $2.90B 19.3% | $3.87B 22.7% | $3.44B 25.7% | $2.55B 193.4% | $990.4M 179.1% |
| Income Tax Expense | $120.5M 8.1% | $845.0M 8.0% | $630.0M 5.2% | $562.3M 4.4% | $822.6M 5.6% | $755.6M 5.0% | $883.8M 5.2% | $699.6M 5.2% | $445.0M 33.8% | $34.6M 6.3% |
| Net Income | $804.0M 54.2% | $1.04B 9.8% | $1.96B 16.3% | $1.48B 11.7% | -$2.91B -20.0% | $2.10B 14.0% | $2.97B 17.5% | $2.82B 21.0% | $2.15B 162.9% | $979.0M 177.0% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $0.35 | $2.81 | $5.18 | $3.80 | $-7.20 | $5.05 | $7.15 | $6.92 | $5.44 | $2.54 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $0.34 | $2.78 | $4.92 | $3.65 | $-7.20 | $4.83 | $6.76 | $6.59 | $5.17 | $2.41 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 332.4M | 369.3M | 377.6M | 390.2M | 404.7M | 416.9M | 415.3M | 407.0M | 394.5M | 377.3M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 338.6M | 373.6M | 401.8M | 423.8M | 404.7M | 452.1M | 451.2M | 433.1M | 415.3M | 407.0M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
7/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash conversion lags reported earnings — watch accruals. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $107M buybacks = $107M returned on $99M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Modest payoff on reinvested capital. Current ROIC on all capital: 7%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $761M covers all $5M of scheduled principal — no refinancing pressure. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-12-31 (20-F).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit. Effective rate ~2312.1% on $448000 of debt.
Cash of $761M fully covers short-term debt of $0.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 12-yr range · 30th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 12-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 53.6 | 49.9 | 53.1 | 57.5 | 58.4 | 58.5 | 61.0 | 62.2 |
| R&D | 5.7 | 6.4 | 7.8 | 7.8 | — | — | — | — |
| SG&A | 4.8 | 9.0 | 5.1 | 4.3 | 4.7 | 4.2 | 4.8 | 4.4 |
| Operating Income | 24.4 | 20.9 | 16.8 | -16.4 | 12.8 | 19.2 | 14.5 | 13.1 |
| Income Tax | 5.2 | 5.2 | 5.0 | 5.6 | 4.4 | 5.2 | 8.0 | 8.1 |
| Net Income | 21.0 | 17.5 | 14.0 | -20.0 | 11.7 | 16.3 | 9.8 | 54.2 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on MOMO: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Ranked against 192 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOOG | $4.15T | 31.8× | 27.8× | 10.3× | 15.1% | 59.7% | 32.8% | 31.8% | 28.5% | 0.3× | 4,874 |
| META | $1.72T | 29.1× | 17.1× | 8.6× | 22.2% | 82.0% | 30.1% | 27.8% | 21.9% | 0.6× | 4,839 |
| AMX | $1.40T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 318 |
| CHT | $354.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 206 |
| NFLX | $318.0B | 29.8× | 23.7× | 7.0× | 15.9% | 48.5% | 24.3% | 41.3% | 26.7% | 1.1× | 3,458 |
| CCZ | $239.2B | 12.0× | 6.4× | 1.9× | -0.0% | — | 16.2% | 20.6% | 19.4% | 0.2× | 1 |
| VZ | $204.2B | 11.9× | 4.2× | 1.5× | 2.5% | — | 12.4% | 16.2% | 16.2% | 0.0× | 3,122 |
| DIS | $200.2B | 15.4× | 10.3× | 2.1× | 3.4% | — | 13.1% | 11.3% | 8.2% | 1.8× | 2,883 |
| TMUS | $184.2B | 17.1× | 8.3× | 2.1× | 8.5% | — | 12.4% | 18.6% | 7.6% | 2.7× | 1,648 |
| T | $182.0B | 8.3× | 6.8× | 1.4× | 2.7% | — | 17.5% | 17.4% | 8.1% | 3.2× | 2,848 |
| VEON | $127.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 97 |
| DASH | $83.1B | 91.3× | 53.5× | 6.1× | 27.9% | — | 6.8% | 9.3% | 9.3% | — | 973 |
| WBD | $70.0B | 97.4× | 15.3× | 1.9× | -5.1% | — | 1.9% | 2.0% | 1.1% | 5.1× | 1,259 |
| EA | $52.6B | 59.7× | 36.1× | 7.0× | 0.9% | 79.0% | 11.8% | 13.1% | 13.1% | — | 998 |
| LYV | $39.6B | — | 25.1× | 1.6× | 8.8% | — | 2.0% | 183% | 5.9% | 5.0× | 779 |
| TTWO | $39.0B | — | 424.4× | 5.9× | 18.2% | 57.2% | -4.5% | -8.5% | -4.9% | 26.7× | 1,011 |
| TWLO | $37.5B | 1172.6× | 107.1× | 7.4× | 13.7% | 48.9% | 0.7% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 2.8× | 776 |
| RDDT | $28.5B | 58.3× | 60.1× | 12.9× | 69.4% | 91.2% | 24.1% | 18.1% | 18.1% | — | 765 |
| FOX | $26.9B | 11.9× | — | 1.6× | 16.6% | — | 14.1% | 19.2% | 12.4% | — | 505 |
| OMC | $24.6B | — | 57.5× | 1.4× | 10.1% | 8.5% | -0.3% | -0.5% | -0.3% | 15.8× | 1,083 |
| ROKU | $22.8B | 261.1× | 530.2× | 4.8× | 15.2% | 43.8% | 1.9% | 3.3% | 3.3% | — | 665 |
| FWONA | $21.5B | — | 39.5× | 4.8× | 22.7% | — | 12.4% | 7.2% | 4.3% | 7.9× | 283 |
| NWS | $18.9B | 16.1× | — | 2.2× | 2.4% | — | 14.0% | 13.4% | 11.0% | — | 304 |
| CHTR | $18.0B | 3.7× | 5.3× | 0.3× | -0.6% | — | 9.1% | 31.1% | 4.5% | 4.5× | 760 |
| TKO | $15.3B | 83.8× | 13.8× | 3.2× | -3.1% | — | 4.1% | 5.2% | 2.6% | 2.9× | 616 |
| MOMO | $704M | 14.4× | -0.3× | 0.5× | 2.4% | 37.8% | 7.8% | 7.3% | 7.3% | 0.0× | 130 |
Peers = companies sharing MOMO's sector (Communication Services) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.