Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional accumulation: ownership increased +1.19% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
4/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81 · book equity (no price)
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend exceeds free cash flow (131%) — funded from the balance sheet or debt, a red flag if it persists. Last year: $20M dividends + $1M buybacks = $21M returned on $15M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: 9%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.”
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
No current price collected.
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 77.8 | 77.6 | 77.6 | 77.1 | 75.4 | 76.4 | 80.8 | 80.9 |
| Gross Profit | 22.2 | 22.4 | 22.4 | 22.9 | 24.6 | 23.6 | 19.2 | 19.1 |
| R&D | 0.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SG&A | 10.4 | 10.7 | 12.2 | 10.7 | 11.0 | 11.3 | 11.6 | 13.4 |
| Operating Income | 11.9 | 11.7 | 10.2 | 12.2 | 13.6 | 12.8 | 7.7 | 5.7 |
| Income Tax | 2.4 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 2.5 | 3.1 | 2.7 | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| Net Income | 9.5 | 9.7 | 8.1 | 9.7 | 10.6 | 10.9 | 7.5 | 4.7 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on MPX: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $244.4M 100.0% | $236.6M 100.0% | $383.7M 100.0% | $381.0M 100.0% | $298.0M 100.0% | $239.8M 100.0% | $292.1M 100.0% | $298.6M 100.0% | $267.3M 100.0% | $241.3M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $197.6M 80.9% | $191.1M 80.8% | $293.4M 76.4% | $287.3M 75.4% | $229.7M 77.1% | $186.2M 77.6% | $226.7M 77.6% | $232.3M 77.8% | $208.3M 77.9% | $190.9M 79.1% |
| Gross Profit | $46.8M 19.1% | $45.5M 19.2% | $90.4M 23.6% | $93.7M 24.6% | $68.3M 22.9% | $53.6M 22.4% | $65.4M 22.4% | $66.3M 22.2% | $59.0M 22.1% | $50.5M 20.9% |
| Research & Development | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $822K 0.3% | $960K 0.4% | $858K 0.4% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $32.7M 13.4% | $27.4M 11.6% | $43.2M 11.3% | $41.9M 11.0% | $31.9M 10.7% | $29.2M 12.2% | $31.3M 10.7% | $30.9M 10.4% | $29.3M 10.9% | $27.4M 11.4% |
| Operating Income | $14.0M 5.7% | $18.3M 7.7% | $49.2M 12.8% | $51.8M 13.6% | $36.4M 12.2% | $24.4M 10.2% | $34.1M 11.7% | $35.4M 11.9% | $29.8M 11.1% | $23.1M 9.6% |
| Interest & Investment Income | — | — | — | — | $16K 0.0% | $95K 0.0% | $323K 0.1% | $268K 0.1% | $229K 0.1% | $355K 0.1% |
| Pretax Income | $15.8M 6.4% | $21.1M 8.9% | $52.1M 13.6% | $52.1M 13.7% | $36.4M 12.2% | $24.5M 10.2% | $34.5M 11.8% | $35.7M 11.9% | $30.0M 11.2% | $23.4M 9.7% |
| Income Tax Expense | $4.4M 1.8% | $3.3M 1.4% | $10.4M 2.7% | $11.8M 3.1% | $7.4M 2.5% | $5.0M 2.1% | $6.2M 2.1% | $7.2M 2.4% | $10.7M 4.0% | $6.7M 2.8% |
| Net Income | $11.4M 4.7% | $17.9M 7.5% | $41.7M 10.9% | $40.3M 10.6% | $29.0M 9.7% | $19.4M 8.1% | $28.2M 9.7% | $28.5M 9.5% | $19.3M 7.2% | $16.7M 6.9% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $0.32 | $0.50 | $1.21 | $1.18 | $0.85 | $0.57 | $0.83 | $0.83 | $0.55 | $0.44 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $0.32 | $0.50 | $1.21 | $1.18 | $0.85 | $0.57 | $0.83 | $0.83 | $0.55 | $0.44 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 34.1M | 33.8M | 33.6M | 33.4M | 33.3M | 33.2M | — | — | 33.8M | 36.6M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 34.1M | 33.8M | 33.6M | 33.4M | 33.3M | 33.2M | 33.2M | 33.6M | 33.8M | 36.6M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Ranked against 490 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN | $2.70T | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.5% | 16.2% | — | 5,764 |
| TSLA | $1.37T | 339.1× | 145.5× | 14.5× | -2.9% | 18.0% | 4.0% | 4.6% | 4.2% | 0.9× | 4,029 |
| TM | $614.2B | 60.0× | 24.8× | 2.6× | 3.8% | 18.4% | 4.4% | 7.9% | 5.9% | 1.7× | 665 |
| PDD | $442.6B | 32.9× | 31.9× | 7.2× | 14.5% | 56.3% | 22.7% | 23.7% | 23.7% | — | 548 |
| HD | $301.3B | 21.3× | 14.3× | 1.8× | 3.2% | 33.3% | 8.6% | 110% | 22.8% | 2.0× | 3,970 |
| BABA | $201.7B | 135.7× | — | 1.4× | 8.1% | 39.8% | 10.1% | 9.8% | 9.8% | — | 1,298 |
| TJX | $140.1B | 26.0× | — | 2.3× | 7.1% | 31.0% | 9.1% | 53.9% | 42.1% | — | 2,608 |
| HTHT | $132.7B | 187.9× | 114.3× | — | — | — | — | 39.7% | 27.3% | 0.7× | 258 |
| SBUX | $109.9B | 59.3× | 26.8× | 3.0× | 2.8% | — | 5.0% | -22.9% | 23.3% | 3.4× | 2,252 |
| LOW | $108.9B | 16.4× | 12.0× | 1.3× | 3.1% | 33.5% | 7.7% | -67.1% | 22.3% | 3.2× | 2,591 |
| ABNB | $101.7B | — | 37.9× | 8.3× | 10.3% | 83.0% | 20.5% | 30.6% | 24.6% | 0.8× | 1,246 |
| MELI | $92.5B | 46.3× | — | 3.2× | 39.1% | 44.5% | 6.9% | 29.6% | 12.5% | — | 1,380 |
| MAR | $88.8B | 35.1× | 20.6× | 3.4× | 4.3% | — | 9.9% | -69.0% | -69.4% | 0.0× | 1,559 |
| LKNCY | $86.3B | 168.2× | 90.8× | 12.3× | 48.9% | — | 7.3% | 23.0% | 23.0% | — | 9 |
| GM | $78.3B | 26.5× | 3.9× | 0.4× | -1.3% | — | 1.5% | 4.4% | 4.4% | — | 1,447 |
| ROST | $74.0B | 34.7× | 22.0× | 3.3× | 7.7% | 27.7% | 9.4% | 34.7% | 27.8% | 0.5× | 1,276 |
| ORLY | $71.5B | 28.6× | 19.5× | 4.0× | 6.4% | 51.6% | 14.3% | -333% | 48.3% | 1.5× | 1,569 |
| HLT | $69.7B | 49.4× | 24.0× | 5.8× | 7.7% | — | 12.1% | -27.0% | -27.0% | — | 1,126 |
| RCL | $67.7B | 16.0× | — | 3.8× | 8.8% | 49.4% | 23.8% | 42.5% | 32.3% | — | 1,114 |
| SE | $62.0B | 40.2× | 24.6× | 2.7× | 36.4% | 44.7% | 6.9% | 12.6% | 12.6% | — | 718 |
| F | $54.2B | — | 4.5× | 0.3× | 1.2% | 6.8% | -4.4% | -22.7% | -22.7% | — | — |
| NKE | $53.9B | 17.3× | — | 1.2× | 0.2% | 42.9% | 6.7% | 20.9% | 13.6% | — | 1,848 |
| EBAY | $50.7B | 26.0× | 18.4× | 4.6× | 7.9% | 71.5% | 18.3% | 45.3% | 38.8% | 0.3× | 1,182 |
| AZO | $47.8B | 19.6× | 13.3× | 2.5× | 2.4% | 52.6% | 13.2% | -73.2% | 46.4% | 2.1× | 1,245 |
| CMG | $44.8B | 29.4× | 19.4× | 3.8× | 5.4% | — | 12.9% | 54.3% | 54.3% | 0.0× | 1,203 |
| MPX | — | — | — | — | 3.3% | 19.1% | 4.7% | 9.1% | 9.1% | — | 74 |
Peers = companies sharing MPX's sector (Consumer Cyclical) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.