Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 391 of 5,944 reporting institutions (96th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $398.75 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 28.2%/yr for a decade (off $110M normalized FCF).
The market's 28.2% is more optimistic than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.02B shares · net debt $146M
mean -19.8% · volatility σ 144% · implied rate exceeded in 1/6 yrs
Central path = implied 28.2%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (144%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
5/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $633000 dividends + $0 buybacks = $633000 returned on $88M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Modest payoff on reinvested capital. Current ROIC on all capital: -235%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~7.4% on $291M of debt.
Cash of $145M fully covers short-term debt of $24M.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-18
No standout strengths flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 10-yr range · 95th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 10-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SG&A | 18.6 | 20.1 | 53.0 | 49.7 | 28.0 | 28.2 | 25.5 | 25.6 |
| Operating Income | -1.2 | -3.6 | -15.6 | -18.9 | 10.5 | 9.6 | 14.2 | 1.4 |
| Income Tax | -3.8 | -0.8 | 3.4 | -17.7 | 3.1 | 5.0 | 4.6 | 0.5 |
| Net Income | 9.1 | 0.7 | -30.2 | -3.4 | 6.2 | 5.4 | 5.7 | -2.2 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on MSGS: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-18
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.04B 100.0% | $1.03B 100.0% | $887.4M 100.0% | $821.4M 100.0% | $415.7M 100.0% | $603.3M 100.0% | $1.63B 100.0% | $1.56B 100.0% | $1.32B 100.0% | $1.12B 100.0% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $266.1M 25.6% | $261.4M 25.5% | $249.9M 28.2% | $229.7M 28.0% | $206.7M 49.7% | $319.7M 53.0% | $327.4M 20.1% | $290.7M 18.6% | $407.0M 30.9% | $333.6M 29.9% |
| Total Operating Expenses | — | — | — | — | — | $697.2M 115.6% | $787.6M 48.3% | $1.54B 98.5% | $1.38B 104.6% | $1.17B 105.3% |
| Operating Income | $14.8M 1.4% | $146.0M 14.2% | $85.2M 9.6% | $86.1M 10.5% | -$78.4M -18.9% | -$93.9M -15.6% | -$58.2M -3.6% | -$18.2M -1.2% | -$56.3M -4.3% | -$58.6M -5.3% |
| Interest Expense | $21.7M 2.1% | $27.6M 2.7% | $22.9M 2.6% | $11.7M 1.4% | $10.6M 2.5% | $4.5M 0.7% | $5.0M 0.3% | $3.5M 0.2% | $4.2M 0.3% | $2.0M 0.2% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $4.0M 0.4% | $2.8M 0.3% | $2.4M 0.3% | $313K 0.0% | $32K 0.0% | $700K 0.1% | $1.2M 0.1% | $901K 0.1% | $11.8M 0.9% | $6.8M 0.6% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$32.1M -3.1% | -$40.4M -3.9% | $4.7M 0.5% | -$12.1M -1.5% | -$10.9M -2.6% | -$4.2M -0.7% | -$2.4M -0.1% | -$3.1M -0.2% | -$24.9M -1.9% | -$18.4M -1.6% |
| Pretax Income | -$17.3M -1.7% | $105.7M 10.3% | $89.9M 10.1% | $73.9M 9.0% | -$89.3M -21.5% | -$98.0M -16.3% | -$60.6M -3.7% | -$21.3M -1.4% | -$81.2M -6.2% | -$77.0M -6.9% |
| Income Tax Expense | $5.2M 0.5% | $46.9M 4.6% | $44.3M 5.0% | $25.1M 3.1% | -$73.4M -17.7% | $20.6M 3.4% | -$12.6M -0.8% | -$59.4M -3.8% | -$4.4M -0.3% | $297K 0.0% |
| Net Income | -$22.4M -2.2% | $58.8M 5.7% | $47.8M 5.4% | $51.1M 6.2% | -$14.0M -3.4% | -$182.4M -30.2% | $11.4M 0.7% | $141.6M 9.1% | -$72.7M -5.5% | -$77.3M -6.9% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-0.93 | $2.45 | $1.90 | $2.11 | $-0.58 | $-7.62 | $0.48 | $5.99 | $-3.05 | $-3.12 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-0.93 | $2.44 | $1.89 | $2.10 | $-0.58 | $-7.62 | $0.48 | $5.94 | $-3.05 | $-3.12 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 24.1M | 24.0M | 24.1M | 24.2M | 24.1M | 23.9M | 23.8M | 23.6M | 23.9M | 24.8M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 24.1M | 24.1M | 24.2M | 24.4M | 24.1M | 23.9M | 23.9M | 23.8M | 23.9M | 24.8M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Ranked against 192 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOOG | $4.16T | 31.9× | 27.8× | 10.3× | 15.1% | 59.7% | 32.8% | 31.8% | 28.5% | 0.3× | 4,874 |
| META | $1.68T | 28.3× | 16.7× | 8.3× | 22.2% | 82.0% | 30.1% | 27.8% | 21.9% | 0.6× | 4,839 |
| AMX | $1.37T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 318 |
| CHT | $356.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 206 |
| NFLX | $303.1B | 28.4× | 22.6× | 6.7× | 15.9% | 48.5% | 24.3% | 41.3% | 26.7% | 1.1× | 3,458 |
| CCZ | $239.2B | 12.0× | 6.4× | 1.9× | -0.0% | — | 16.2% | 20.6% | 19.4% | 0.2× | 1 |
| VZ | $203.2B | 11.8× | 4.1× | 1.5× | 2.5% | — | 12.4% | 16.2% | 16.2% | 0.0× | 3,122 |
| DIS | $195.1B | 15.0× | 10.1× | 2.1× | 3.4% | — | 13.1% | 11.3% | 8.2% | 1.8× | 2,883 |
| TMUS | $186.2B | 17.3× | 8.4× | 2.1× | 8.5% | — | 12.4% | 18.6% | 7.6% | 2.7× | 1,648 |
| T | $182.1B | 8.4× | 6.8× | 1.4× | 2.7% | — | 17.5% | 17.4% | 8.1% | 3.2× | 2,848 |
| VEON | $126.9B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 97 |
| DASH | $82.4B | 90.6× | 53.1× | 6.0× | 27.9% | — | 6.8% | 9.3% | 9.3% | — | 973 |
| WBD | $68.9B | 95.9× | 15.1× | 1.9× | -5.1% | — | 1.9% | 2.0% | 1.1% | 5.1× | 1,259 |
| EA | $52.6B | 59.7× | 36.1× | 7.0× | 0.9% | 79.0% | 11.8% | 13.1% | 13.1% | — | 998 |
| LYV | $39.3B | — | 24.9× | 1.6× | 8.8% | — | 2.0% | 183% | 5.9% | 5.0× | 779 |
| TTWO | $38.1B | — | 414.2× | 5.7× | 18.2% | 57.2% | -4.5% | -8.5% | -4.9% | 26.7× | 1,011 |
| TWLO | $37.2B | 1161.1× | 106.1× | 7.3× | 13.7% | 48.9% | 0.7% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 2.8× | 776 |
| RDDT | $28.1B | 57.6× | 59.3× | 12.8× | 69.4% | 91.2% | 24.1% | 18.1% | 18.1% | — | 765 |
| FOX | $26.6B | 11.8× | — | 1.6× | 16.6% | — | 14.1% | 19.2% | 12.4% | — | 505 |
| OMC | $24.0B | — | 56.5× | 1.4× | 10.1% | 8.5% | -0.3% | -0.5% | -0.3% | 15.8× | 1,083 |
| ROKU | $22.7B | 260.4× | 528.5× | 4.8× | 15.2% | 43.8% | 1.9% | 3.3% | 3.3% | — | 665 |
| FWONA | $21.5B | — | 39.4× | 4.8× | 22.7% | — | 12.4% | 7.2% | 4.3% | 7.9× | 283 |
| NWS | $18.6B | 15.8× | — | 2.2× | 2.4% | — | 14.0% | 13.4% | 11.0% | — | 304 |
| CHTR | $17.3B | 3.5× | 5.3× | 0.3× | -0.6% | — | 9.1% | 31.1% | 4.5% | 4.5× | 760 |
| TKO | $15.3B | 83.7× | 13.8× | 3.2× | -3.1% | — | 4.1% | 5.2% | 2.6% | 2.9× | 616 |
| MSGS | $9.6B | — | 541.0× | 9.2× | 1.2% | — | -2.2% | 8.0% | -235% | 16.1× | 391 |
Peers = companies sharing MSGS's sector (Communication Services) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.