Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 478 of 5,944 reporting institutions (97th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $263.14 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 33.2%/yr for a decade (off $158M normalized FCF).
The market's 33.2% is more optimistic than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.07B shares · net debt $388M
mean -24.2% · volatility σ 64% · implied rate exceeded in 1/7 yrs
Central path = implied 33.2%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (64%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2026
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2026 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $967.3M 100.0% | $729.6M 100.0% | $648.4M 100.0% | $675.2M 100.0% | $606.9M 100.0% | $530.0M 100.0% | $499.7M 100.0% | $570.4M 100.0% | $698.8M 100.0% | $544.3M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $438.3M 45.3% | $335.8M 46.0% | $262.6M 40.5% | $269.0M 39.8% | $265.1M 43.7% | $259.9M 49.0% | $279.0M 55.8% | $324.7M 56.9% | $371.9M 53.2% | $262.7M 48.3% |
| Gross Profit | $529.0M 54.7% | $393.8M 54.0% | $385.8M 59.5% | $406.2M 60.2% | $341.9M 56.3% | $270.2M 51.0% | $220.7M 44.2% | $245.7M 43.1% | $326.9M 46.8% | $281.6M 51.7% |
| Research & Development | $244.5M 25.3% | $182.2M 25.0% | $148.5M 22.9% | $148.2M 22.0% | $138.8M 22.9% | $141.3M 26.7% | $163.5M 32.7% | $177.7M 31.2% | $148.0M 21.2% | $107.7M 19.8% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $154.9M 16.0% | $137.9M 18.9% | $129.9M 20.0% | $125.3M 18.6% | $122.0M 20.1% | $124.3M 23.5% | $153.3M 30.7% | $161.7M 28.3% | $187.9M 26.9% | $145.4M 26.7% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $399.4M 41.3% | $320.1M 43.9% | $278.4M 42.9% | $273.5M 40.5% | $260.9M 43.0% | $266.8M 50.3% | $601.1M 120.3% | $352.2M 61.8% | $343.0M 49.1% | $268.4M 49.3% |
| Operating Income | $129.7M 13.4% | $73.7M 10.1% | $107.4M 16.6% | $132.7M 19.7% | $81.0M 13.3% | $3.4M 0.6% | -$380.4M -76.1% | -$106.5M -18.7% | -$16.1M -2.3% | $13.2M 2.4% |
| Interest Expense | $5.5M 0.6% | $5.1M 0.7% | $12.4M 1.9% | $8.6M 1.3% | $22.1M 3.6% | $27.4M 5.2% | $35.8M 7.2% | $31.3M 5.5% | $28.9M 4.1% | $18.4M 3.4% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $29.9M 3.1% | $23.0M 3.2% | $20.8M 3.2% | $4.3M 0.6% | $1.5M 0.2% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$158.7M -16.4% | $17.9M 2.4% | $7.8M 1.2% | $110.4M 16.4% | -$38.1M -6.3% | -$45.0M -8.5% | -$42.8M -8.6% | -$48.7M -8.5% | -$33.4M -4.8% | -$34.8M -6.4% |
| Pretax Income | -$29.0M -3.0% | $91.5M 12.5% | $115.2M 17.8% | $243.1M 36.0% | $42.9M 7.1% | -$41.6M -7.8% | -$423.2M -84.7% | -$155.2M -27.2% | -$49.5M -7.1% | -$21.6M -4.0% |
| Income Tax Expense | $25.2M 2.6% | $14.7M 2.0% | $23.6M 3.6% | -$196.8M -29.2% | $5.0M 0.8% | $4.5M 0.9% | -$39.4M -7.9% | -$21.5M -3.8% | $100.9M 14.4% | -$18.0M -3.3% |
| Net Income | -$54.2M -5.6% | $76.9M 10.5% | $91.6M 14.1% | $440.0M 65.2% | $38.0M 6.3% | -$46.1M -8.7% | -$383.8M -76.8% | -$140.0M -24.5% | -$169.5M -24.3% | $1.4M 0.3% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-0.73 | $1.07 | $1.29 | $6.30 | $0.55 | $-0.69 | $-5.84 | $-2.16 | $-2.79 | $0.03 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-0.73 | $1.04 | $1.28 | $6.18 | $0.54 | $-0.69 | $-5.84 | $-2.57 | $-2.79 | $0.03 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 74.0M | 72.0M | 70.8M | 69.8M | 68.4M | 66.6M | 65.7M | 64.7M | 60.7M | 53.4M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 74.0M | 73.6M | 71.5M | 71.2M | 70.5M | 66.6M | 65.7M | 65.3M | 60.7M | 53.4M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $43M buybacks = $43M returned on $193M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Modest payoff on reinvested capital. Current ROIC on all capital: -3%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit. Effective rate ~1.1% on $501M of debt.
Cash of $112M is below short-term debt of $161M — relies on refinancing/operations.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
No standout strengths flagged.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2026 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 2.3× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 56.9 | 55.8 | 49.0 | 43.7 | 39.8 | 40.5 | 46.0 | 45.3 |
| Gross Profit | 43.1 | 44.2 | 51.0 | 56.3 | 60.2 | 59.5 | 54.0 | 54.7 |
| R&D | 31.2 | 32.7 | 26.7 | 22.9 | 22.0 | 22.9 | 25.0 | 25.3 |
| SG&A | 28.3 | 30.7 | 23.5 | 20.1 | 18.6 | 20.0 | 18.9 | 16.0 |
| Operating Income | -18.7 | -76.1 | 0.6 | 13.3 | 19.7 | 16.6 | 10.1 | 13.4 |
| Income Tax | -3.8 | -7.9 | 0.9 | 0.8 | -29.2 | 3.6 | 2.0 | 2.6 |
| Net Income | -24.5 | -76.8 | -8.7 | 6.3 | 65.2 | 14.1 | 10.5 | -5.6 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on MTSI: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 743 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSM | $11.16T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,121 |
| NVDA | $5.33T | 44.8× | 40.0× | 24.7× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.98T | 45.2× | 34.8× | 12.0× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 68.1% | 0.6× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.70T | 27.7× | 19.6× | 11.1× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 27.7% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.65T | 72.8× | 65.1× | 25.8× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.10T | 128.8× | 60.7× | 29.3× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $888.5B | 205.7× | 210.2× | 25.6× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| INTC | $543.3B | — | 67.4× | 10.3× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $436.6B | 43.2× | 36.6× | 7.7× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| PLTR | $421.4B | 279.8× | 291.6× | 94.2× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| DELL | $383.6B | 67.8× | 36.1× | 3.4× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| LRCX | $341.7B | 64.9× | 54.5× | 18.5× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 37.4% | 0.7× | 2,500 |
| RPAY | $338.0B | — | — | 1092.8× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -28.2% | -1.7× | 142 |
| AMAT | $331.0B | 48.2× | 38.1× | 11.7× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| UMC | $307.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| ARM | $281.9B | 311.6× | 242.9× | 57.3× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| SAP | $262.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 794 |
| ANET | $250.7B | 72.6× | 63.3× | 27.8× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 39.0% | 28.4% | 28.4% | — | 1,930 |
| PANW | $250.5B | 234.4× | 156.5× | 27.2× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| SNDK | $235.7B | — | — | 32.0× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.8% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| TXN | $234.6B | 47.4× | 30.9× | 13.3× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.5% | 1.8× | 2,345 |
| CRM | $225.6B | 31.1× | 24.4× | 5.4× | 9.6% | 77.7% | 18.0% | 12.6% | 10.1% | 1.5× | 2,547 |
| IBM | $222.8B | 21.3× | — | 3.3× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| MRVL | $204.0B | 78.4× | 133.3× | 24.9× | 42.1% | 51.0% | 32.6% | 18.7% | 14.2% | 2.9× | 1,477 |
| QCOM | $202.7B | 37.7× | 15.2× | 4.6× | 13.7% | 55.4% | 12.5% | 26.1% | 15.4% | 1.1× | 2,611 |
| MTSI | $19.6B | — | 103.6× | 20.3× | 32.6% | 54.7% | -5.6% | -4.1% | -3.0% | 2.6× | 478 |
Peers = companies sharing MTSI's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.