Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 203 of 5,944 reporting institutions (92th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $4.02 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 3.3%/yr for a decade (off $71M normalized FCF).
The market's 3.3% is more conservative than its 6-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.19B shares · net debt $282M
mean 87.5% · volatility σ 159% · implied rate exceeded in 4/6 yrs
Central path = implied 3.3%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (159%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on $75M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 7 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Modest payoff on reinvested capital. Current ROIC on all capital: -1%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 7 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.”
Cash of $112M fully covers short-term debt of $4M.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Where each multiple sits in its own 5-yr range · 0th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 5-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 21.8 | 20.9 | 15.1 | 15.8 | 16.2 | 17.3 | 22.9 |
| Gross Profit | 78.2 | 79.1 | 84.9 | 84.2 | 83.8 | 82.7 | 77.1 |
| R&D | 14.1 | 14.1 | 15.6 | 17.1 | 18.5 | 19.5 | 19.7 |
| SG&A | 14.8 | 18.9 | 23.3 | 19.1 | 16.6 | 16.4 | 17.9 |
| Operating Income | 13.9 | 11.1 | 9.6 | 12.7 | 16.7 | 17.7 | 7.2 |
| Income Tax | 2.2 | 4.0 | 3.3 | 3.7 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 3.8 |
| Net Income | -1.0 | -2.4 | 0.0 | 4.5 | 5.5 | 6.6 | -3.3 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on NABL: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $511.4M 100.0% | $466.1M 100.0% | $421.9M 100.0% | $371.8M 100.0% | $346.5M 100.0% | $302.9M 100.0% | $263.5M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $117.1M 22.9% | $80.7M 17.3% | $68.2M 16.2% | $58.6M 15.8% | $52.4M 15.1% | $63.2M 20.9% | $57.3M 21.8% |
| Gross Profit | $394.4M 77.1% | $385.5M 82.7% | $353.7M 83.8% | $313.2M 84.2% | $294.0M 84.9% | $239.7M 79.1% | $206.2M 78.2% |
| Research & Development | $100.7M 19.7% | $90.7M 19.5% | $78.2M 18.5% | $63.5M 17.1% | $54.0M 15.6% | $42.7M 14.1% | $37.2M 14.1% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $91.7M 17.9% | $76.5M 16.4% | $69.9M 16.6% | $71.1M 19.1% | $80.6M 23.3% | $57.3M 18.9% | $39.0M 14.8% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $357.6M 69.9% | $303.1M 65.0% | $283.4M 67.2% | $265.8M 71.5% | $260.7M 75.2% | $205.9M 68.0% | $169.6M 64.4% |
| Operating Income | $36.8M 7.2% | $82.4M 17.7% | $70.3M 16.7% | $47.4M 12.7% | $33.3M 9.6% | $33.8M 11.1% | $36.6M 13.9% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$34.4M -6.7% | -$28.1M -6.0% | -$26.0M -6.2% | -$17.0M -4.6% | -$21.7M -6.3% | -$28.9M -9.5% | -$33.4M -12.7% |
| Pretax Income | $2.4M 0.5% | $54.3M 11.6% | $44.3M 10.5% | $30.4M 8.2% | $11.6M 3.3% | $4.9M 1.6% | $3.2M 1.2% |
| Income Tax Expense | $19.4M 3.8% | $23.3M 5.0% | $20.9M 5.0% | $13.7M 3.7% | $11.5M 3.3% | $12.0M 4.0% | $5.7M 2.2% |
| Net Income | -$17.0M -3.3% | $31.0M 6.6% | $23.4M 5.5% | $16.7M 4.5% | $113K 0.0% | -$7.2M -2.4% | -$2.5M -1.0% |
| Per Share | |||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-0.09 | $0.17 | $0.13 | $0.09 | $0.00 | $-0.05 | $-0.02 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-0.09 | $0.16 | $0.13 | $0.09 | $0.00 | $-0.05 | $-0.02 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 187.8M | 185.3M | 182.4M | 180.1M | 167.5M | 158.1M | 158.1M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 187.8M | 188.4M | 186.0M | 181.3M | 168.7M | 158.1M | 158.1M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 743 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSM | $10.83T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,121 |
| NVDA | $5.20T | 43.6× | 39.0× | 24.1× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.98T | 45.2× | 34.8× | 12.0× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 68.1% | 0.6× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.64T | 27.3× | 19.3× | 11.0× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 27.7% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.65T | 72.8× | 65.1× | 25.8× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.04T | 122.1× | 57.5× | 27.8× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $888.5B | 205.7× | 210.2× | 25.6× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| INTC | $504.6B | — | 62.9× | 9.6× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $426.7B | 42.3× | 35.8× | 7.5× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| PLTR | $416.9B | 276.7× | 288.5× | 93.2× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| DELL | $367.3B | 64.9× | 34.6× | 3.2× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| LRCX | $341.6B | 64.9× | 54.5× | 18.5× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 37.4% | 0.7× | 2,500 |
| AMAT | $331.0B | 48.2× | 38.1× | 11.7× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| RPAY | $325.1B | — | — | 1051.3× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -28.2% | -1.7× | 142 |
| UMC | $283.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| ARM | $281.9B | 311.6× | 242.9× | 57.3× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| SAP | $261.9B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 794 |
| PANW | $250.9B | 234.8× | 156.8× | 27.2× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| ANET | $250.7B | 72.6× | 63.3× | 27.8× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 39.0% | 28.4% | 28.4% | — | 1,930 |
| TXN | $236.9B | 47.8× | 31.2× | 13.4× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.5% | 1.8× | 2,345 |
| CRM | $232.8B | 32.1× | 25.2× | 5.6× | 9.6% | 77.7% | 18.0% | 12.6% | 10.1% | 1.5× | 2,547 |
| IBM | $222.5B | 21.3× | — | 3.3× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| SNDK | $221.9B | — | — | 30.2× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.8% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| QCOM | $198.5B | 36.9× | 14.9× | 4.5× | 13.7% | 55.4% | 12.5% | 26.1% | 15.4% | 1.1× | 2,611 |
| MRVL | $194.6B | 74.8× | 127.2× | 23.8× | 42.1% | 51.0% | 32.6% | 18.7% | 14.2% | 2.9× | 1,477 |
| NABL | $719M | — | 12.4× | 1.4× | 9.7% | 77.1% | -3.3% | -2.1% | -1.4% | 4.9× | 203 |
Peers = companies sharing NABL's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.