Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional accumulation: ownership increased +2.54% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $13.09 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds -10.7%/yr for a decade (off $25M normalized FCF).
The market's -10.7% is more conservative than its 8-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.02B shares · net debt -$94M
mean 131.3% · volatility σ 341% · implied rate exceeded in 3/7 yrs
Central path = implied -10.7%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (341%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
6/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $16M buybacks = $16M returned on $29M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A balanced mix of reinvestment and shareholder returns.
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 12%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $94M covers all $4M of scheduled principal — no refinancing pressure. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2020-12-31 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $480.1M 100.0% | $454.4M 100.0% | $445.3M 100.0% | $421.9M 100.0% | $444.1M 100.0% | $385.2M 100.0% | $362.2M 100.0% | $364.8M 100.0% | $342.0M 100.0% | $341.2M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $132.4M 27.6% | $129.7M 28.5% | $124.2M 27.9% | $122.2M 29.0% | $115.5M 26.0% | $101.3M 26.3% | $93.9M 25.9% | $95.7M 26.2% | $91.0M 26.6% | $90.9M 26.7% |
| Gross Profit | $347.7M 72.4% | $324.7M 71.5% | $321.1M 72.1% | $299.8M 71.0% | $328.6M 74.0% | $283.9M 73.7% | $268.3M 74.1% | $269.1M 73.8% | $251.0M 73.4% | $250.2M 73.3% |
| Research & Development | $1.9M 0.4% | $1.7M 0.4% | $1.6M 0.4% | $1.5M 0.4% | $1.4M 0.3% | $1.5M 0.4% | $2.1M 0.6% | $2.8M 0.8% | $3.4M 1.0% | $3.2M 0.9% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $178.4M 37.2% | $164.0M 36.1% | $167.1M 37.5% | $153.1M 36.3% | $154.1M 34.7% | $131.3M 34.1% | $128.7M 35.5% | $138.4M 37.9% | $129.6M 37.9% | $120.3M 35.3% |
| Operating Income | $24.7M 5.2% | $20.1M 4.4% | $18.7M 4.2% | $16.3M 3.9% | $34.7M 7.8% | $21.5M 5.6% | $16.1M 4.5% | $5.4M 1.5% | $1.4M 0.4% | $10.0M 2.9% |
| Interest Expense | $98K 0.0% | $146K 0.0% | $69K 0.0% | $249K 0.1% | $250K 0.1% | $102K 0.0% | $43K 0.0% | $387K 0.1% | $289K 0.1% | $16K 0.0% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $5.1M 1.1% | -$1.7M -0.4% | $1.5M 0.3% | -$1.0M -0.2% | -$2.8M -0.6% | $1.3M 0.3% | -$483K -0.1% | -$2.2M -0.6% | $1.8M 0.5% | -$773K -0.2% |
| Pretax Income | $29.8M 6.2% | $18.4M 4.1% | $20.2M 4.5% | $15.2M 3.6% | $31.8M 7.2% | $22.8M 5.9% | $15.6M 4.3% | $3.2M 0.9% | $3.2M 0.9% | $9.3M 2.7% |
| Income Tax Expense | $9.4M 1.9% | $10.5M 2.3% | $3.8M 0.9% | $14.7M 3.5% | $1.6M 0.4% | -$137K -0.0% | $8.7M 2.4% | $4.4M 1.2% | $17.0M 5.0% | $8.6M 2.5% |
| Net Income | $19.5M 4.1% | $7.7M 1.7% | $15.1M 3.4% | -$390K -0.1% | $30.2M 6.8% | $23.0M 6.0% | $6.9M 1.9% | -$1.2M -0.3% | -$13.8M -4.0% | $675K 0.2% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $1.08 | $0.41 | $0.79 | $-0.02 | $1.45 | $1.09 | $0.35 | $-0.04 | $-0.69 | $0.11 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $1.06 | $0.40 | $0.77 | $-0.02 | $1.42 | $1.07 | $0.34 | $-0.04 | $-0.69 | $0.11 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 18.0M | 18.6M | 19.1M | 19.3M | 19.9M | 19.5M | 19.3M | 19.1M | 18.9M | 18.7M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 18.5M | 19.1M | 19.5M | 19.3M | 20.3M | 20.0M | 19.7M | 19.1M | 18.9M | 19.1M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 22th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 4.1× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 26.2 | 25.9 | 26.3 | 26.0 | 29.0 | 27.9 | 28.5 | 27.6 |
| Gross Profit | 73.8 | 74.1 | 73.7 | 74.0 | 71.0 | 72.1 | 71.5 | 72.4 |
| R&D | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| SG&A | 37.9 | 35.5 | 34.1 | 34.7 | 36.3 | 37.5 | 36.1 | 37.2 |
| Operating Income | 1.5 | 4.5 | 5.6 | 7.8 | 3.9 | 4.2 | 4.4 | 5.2 |
| Income Tax | 1.2 | 2.4 | -0.0 | 0.4 | 3.5 | 0.9 | 2.3 | 1.9 |
| Net Income | -0.3 | 1.9 | 6.0 | 6.8 | -0.1 | 3.4 | 1.7 | 4.1 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on NATR: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Ranked against 229 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WMT | $852.5B | 39.1× | — | 1.2× | 4.7% | 24.9% | 3.1% | 22.0% | 15.5% | — | 4,273 |
| COST | $396.2B | 49.1× | 30.3× | 1.4× | 8.2% | 12.8% | 2.9% | 27.8% | 23.2% | 0.5× | 4,050 |
| KO | $378.9B | 29.0× | 24.9× | 7.9× | 1.9% | 61.6% | 27.3% | 40.7% | 40.7% | — | 3,427 |
| PG | $346.8B | 22.7× | 16.4× | 4.1× | 0.3% | 51.2% | 19.0% | 30.6% | 18.4% | 1.5× | 3,849 |
| PM | $296.4B | 26.2× | 17.3× | 7.3× | 7.3% | 67.1% | 27.9% | -114% | -115% | 0.0× | 2,744 |
| PEP | $183.0B | 22.3× | 14.9× | 1.9× | 2.3% | 54.1% | 8.8% | 40.4% | 11.8% | 3.3× | 3,404 |
| MO | $116.7B | 16.9× | 13.6× | 5.0× | -3.1% | 62.5% | 29.8% | -198% | 31.3% | 2.5× | 2,375 |
| MDLZ | $80.3B | 32.8× | 18.9× | 2.1× | 5.8% | 28.4% | 6.4% | 9.5% | 8.6% | 0.6× | 1,821 |
| TGT | $72.4B | 19.7× | 10.5× | 0.7× | -1.7% | 27.9% | 3.5% | 22.9% | 12.1% | 1.7× | 1,771 |
| CL | $70.3B | 33.4× | 19.6× | 3.5× | 1.4% | 60.1% | 10.5% | 3948% | 26.5% | 2.0× | 1,873 |
| MNST | $43.5B | — | 16.4× | 5.3× | 10.7% | 55.8% | 23.0% | 23.1% | 23.1% | — | 1,169 |
| KDP | $42.7B | 20.5× | 14.3× | 2.6× | 8.2% | 54.2% | 12.5% | 8.1% | 5.0% | 4.0× | 784 |
| ADM | $42.6B | 39.5× | — | 0.5× | -6.2% | 6.3% | 1.3% | 4.7% | 3.6% | — | 1,070 |
| FMX | $41.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 290 |
| JBS | $39.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 241 |
| KR | $39.6B | 39.5× | 10.0× | 0.3× | 0.4% | — | 0.7% | 17.1% | 4.7% | 3.0× | 1,327 |
| SYY | $38.6B | 21.2× | 9.7× | 0.5× | 3.2% | 18.4% | 2.2% | 99.9% | 99.9% | — | 1,489 |
| KVUE | $34.2B | 23.5× | 11.7× | 2.3× | -2.1% | 58.1% | 9.7% | 13.7% | 12.0% | 0.5× | 967 |
| HSY | $34.1B | — | 20.1× | 2.9× | 4.4% | 33.5% | 7.6% | 19.0% | 9.3% | 2.5× | 1,406 |
| EL | $33.8B | — | 768.2× | 2.4× | -8.2% | 74.0% | -7.9% | -29.3% | -29.3% | 0.1× | 800 |
| KMB | $32.6B | 16.2× | 10.3× | 2.0× | -2.1% | 36.0% | 12.3% | 135% | 92.0% | 0.2× | 1,585 |
| KHC | $29.3B | — | — | 1.2× | -3.5% | 33.3% | -23.4% | -14.0% | -14.0% | — | 1,059 |
| DG | $27.5B | 18.2× | 8.1× | 0.6× | 5.2% | 30.7% | 3.5% | 17.8% | 17.8% | — | 1,099 |
| KOF | $23.6B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 249 |
| CHD | $23.1B | 31.5× | 18.8× | 3.7× | 1.6% | 44.7% | 11.9% | 18.4% | 11.9% | 1.7× | 1,004 |
| NATR | $229M | 12.3× | 3.5× | 0.5× | 5.7% | 72.4% | 4.1% | 12.1% | 12.1% | — | 145 |
Peers = companies sharing NATR's sector (Consumer Defensive) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.