Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 2,102 of 5,944 reporting institutions (100th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Ranked against 743 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSM | $10.83T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,121 |
| NVDA | $5.20T | 43.6× | 39.0× | 24.1× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.91T | 44.6× | 34.3× | 11.8× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 68.1% | 0.6× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.64T | 27.3× | 19.3× | 11.0× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 27.7% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.61T | 71.2× | 63.6× | 25.2× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.04T | 122.1× | 57.5× | 27.8× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $835.4B | 193.4× | 197.6× | 24.1× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| INTC | $504.6B | — | 62.9× | 9.6× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $426.7B | 42.3× | 35.8× | 7.5× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| PLTR | $416.9B | 276.7× | 288.5× | 93.2× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| DELL | $367.3B | 64.9× | 34.6× | 3.2× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| LRCX | $341.6B | 64.9× | 54.5× | 18.5× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 37.4% | 0.7× | 2,500 |
| AMAT | $329.4B | 48.0× | 37.9× | 11.6× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| RPAY | $325.1B | — | — | 1051.3× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -28.2% | -1.7× | 142 |
| UMC | $283.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| SAP | $261.9B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 794 |
| ARM | $259.6B | 287.0× | 223.6× | 52.8× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| PANW | $250.9B | 234.8× | 156.8× | 27.2× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| ANET | $248.2B | 71.8× | 62.7× | 27.6× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 39.0% | 28.4% | 28.4% | — | 1,930 |
| TXN | $236.9B | 47.8× | 31.2× | 13.4× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.5% | 1.8× | 2,345 |
| CRM | $232.8B | 32.1× | 25.2× | 5.6× | 9.6% | 77.7% | 18.0% | 12.6% | 10.1% | 1.5× | 2,547 |
| IBM | $222.5B | 21.3× | — | 3.3× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| SNDK | $221.9B | — | — | 30.2× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.8% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| QCOM | $198.5B | 36.9× | 14.9× | 4.5× | 13.7% | 55.4% | 12.5% | 26.1% | 15.4% | 1.1× | 2,611 |
| MRVL | $194.6B | 74.8× | 127.2× | 23.8× | 42.1% | 51.0% | 32.6% | 18.7% | 14.2% | 2.9× | 1,477 |
| NOW | $146.4B | 83.7× | 56.3× | 11.0× | 20.9% | 77.5% | 13.2% | 13.5% | 12.1% | 0.6× | 2,102 |
Peers = companies sharing NOW's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $138.47 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 17.2%/yr for a decade (off $3.6B normalized FCF).
The market's 17.2% is more conservative than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 1.05B shares · net debt -$2.2B
mean 120.3% · volatility σ 263% · implied rate exceeded in 9/9 yrs
Central path = implied 17.2%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (263%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
3/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $1.8B buybacks = $1.8B returned on $4.6B FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 12%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit. Interest last disclosed in FY2022 (no longer broken out).
Cash of $3.7B fully covers short-term debt of $0.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.28B 100.0% | $10.98B 100.0% | $8.97B 100.0% | $7.25B 100.0% | $5.90B 100.0% | $4.52B 100.0% | $3.46B 100.0% | $2.61B 100.0% | $1.93B 100.0% | $1.39B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $2.98B 22.5% | $2.29B 20.8% | $1.92B 21.4% | $1.57B 21.7% | $1.35B 22.9% | $987.0M 21.8% | $796.0M 23.0% | $622.7M 23.9% | $499.9M 25.9% | $399.0M 28.7% |
| Gross Profit | $10.29B 77.5% | $8.70B 79.2% | $7.05B 78.6% | $5.67B 78.3% | $4.54B 77.1% | $3.53B 78.2% | $2.66B 77.0% | $1.99B 76.1% | $1.42B 73.4% | $992.0M 71.3% |
| Research & Development | $2.96B 22.3% | $2.54B 23.2% | $2.12B 23.7% | $1.77B 24.4% | $1.40B 23.7% | $1.02B 22.7% | $749.0M 21.6% | $529.5M 20.3% | $377.5M 19.5% | $285.2M 20.5% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $1.12B 8.5% | $936.0M 8.5% | $863.0M 9.6% | $735.0M 10.1% | $597.0M 10.1% | $454.0M 10.0% | $339.0M 9.8% | $296.0M 11.3% | $210.5M 10.9% | $158.9M 11.4% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $8.47B 63.8% | $7.33B 66.8% | $6.29B 70.1% | $5.32B 73.4% | $4.29B 72.7% | $3.33B 73.8% | $2.62B 75.8% | $2.03B 77.8% | $1.48B 76.7% | $1.37B 98.8% |
| Operating Income | $1.82B 13.7% | $1.36B 12.4% | $762.0M 8.5% | $355.0M 4.9% | $257.0M 4.4% | $199.0M 4.4% | $42.0M 1.2% | -$42.4M -1.6% | -$64.4M -3.3% | -$382.2M -27.5% |
| Interest Expense | — | — | — | $27.0M 0.4% | $28.0M 0.5% | $33.0M 0.7% | $33.0M 1.0% | $52.7M 2.0% | $53.4M 2.8% | $33.3M 2.4% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$14.0M -0.1% | -$45.0M -0.4% | -$56.0M -0.6% | -$38.0M -0.5% | -$28.0M -0.5% | -$16.0M -0.4% | $58.3M 1.7% | $56.1M 2.2% | $4.4M 0.2% | $5.0M 0.4% |
| Pretax Income | $2.26B 17.0% | $1.74B 15.8% | $1.01B 11.2% | $399.0M 5.5% | $249.0M 4.2% | $150.0M 3.3% | $67.0M 1.9% | -$39.0M -1.5% | -$113.4M -5.9% | -$410.4M -29.5% |
| Income Tax Expense | $513.0M 3.9% | $313.0M 2.8% | -$723.0M -8.1% | $74.0M 1.0% | $19.0M 0.3% | $31.0M 0.7% | -$560.0M -16.2% | -$12.3M -0.5% | $3.4M 0.2% | $3.8M 0.3% |
| Net Income | $1.75B 13.2% | $1.43B 13.0% | $1.73B 19.3% | $325.0M 4.5% | $230.0M 3.9% | $119.0M 2.6% | $626.7M 18.1% | -$26.7M -1.0% | -$116.8M -6.0% | -$414.2M -29.8% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $1.69 | $1.38 | $1.70 | $1.61 | $1.16 | $0.61 | $3.36 | $-0.15 | $-0.68 | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | $1.67 | $1.37 | $1.68 | $1.60 | $1.13 | $0.59 | $3.18 | $-0.15 | $-0.68 | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 1.04B | 1.03B | 1.02B | 201.4M | 198.1M | 193.1M | 186.5M | 177.8M | 171.2M | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 1.05B | 1.04B | 1.03B | 203.5M | 203.2M | 202.5M | 197.2M | 177.8M | 171.2M | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 67th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 1.6× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 23.9 | 23.0 | 21.8 | 22.9 | 21.7 | 21.4 | 20.8 | 22.5 |
| Gross Profit | 76.1 | 77.0 | 78.2 | 77.1 | 78.3 | 78.6 | 79.2 | 77.5 |
| R&D | 20.3 | 21.6 | 22.7 | 23.7 | 24.4 | 23.7 | 23.2 | 22.3 |
| SG&A | 11.3 | 9.8 | 10.0 | 10.1 | 10.1 | 9.6 | 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Operating Income | -1.6 | 1.2 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.9 | 8.5 | 12.4 | 13.7 |
| Income Tax | -0.5 | -16.2 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 1.0 | -8.1 | 2.8 | 3.9 |
| Net Income | -1.0 | 18.1 | 2.6 | 3.9 | 4.5 | 19.3 | 13.0 | 13.2 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on NOW: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.