Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 244 of 5,944 reporting institutions (93th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $18.23 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 13.2%/yr for a decade (off $93M normalized FCF).
The market's 13.2% is more conservative than its 6-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.09B shares · net debt $1.1B
mean 68.5% · volatility σ 51% · implied rate exceeded in 5/6 yrs
Central path = implied 13.2%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (51%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
5/7 of the 9 checks — 2 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 7 with data.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 64% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $70M dividends + $753000 buybacks = $71M returned on $109M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 7 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Insufficient data. Current ROIC on all capital: 0%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 7 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.” Effective rate ~4.7% on $1.1B of debt.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $195.0M 100.0% | $162.8M 100.0% | $131.9M 100.0% | $96.3M 100.0% | $59.1M 100.0% | $33.7M 100.0% | — |
| Selling, General & Admin | $21.7M 11.1% | $19.7M 12.1% | $20.2M 15.3% | $19.1M 19.8% | $14.8M 25.0% | $11.3M 33.6% | $3.6M |
| Total Operating Expenses | $144.8M 74.3% | $144.3M 88.7% | $107.8M 81.7% | $82.8M 86.0% | $55.7M 94.1% | $35.2M 104.4% | $22.8M |
| Interest Expense | $51.3M 26.3% | $30.3M 18.6% | $19.1M 14.4% | $9.2M 9.5% | $3.7M 6.3% | $4.7M 14.1% | $10.7M |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$43.2M -22.2% | -$30.4M -18.7% | -$17.3M -13.1% | -$4.9M -5.1% | -$272K -0.5% | $1.7M 5.1% | -$5.1M |
| Pretax Income | $7.0M 3.6% | -$12.0M -7.3% | $6.8M 5.2% | $8.6M 8.9% | $3.2M 5.4% | $212K 0.6% | -$8.1M |
| Income Tax Expense | $54K 0.0% | $49K 0.0% | -$49K -0.0% | $396K 0.4% | $59K 0.1% | $0 0.0% | $0 |
| Net Income | $6.9M 3.6% | -$12.0M -7.4% | $6.9M 5.2% | $8.2M 8.5% | $3.1M 5.3% | $212K 0.6% | -$8.1M |
| Per Share | |||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $0.08 | $-0.16 | $0.11 | $0.16 | $0.08 | $0.04 | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | $0.08 | $-0.16 | $0.11 | $0.16 | $0.08 | $0.01 | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 82.7M | 76.5M | 63.9M | 49.5M | 37.0M | 17.3M | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 84.2M | 76.5M | 64.7M | 50.4M | 38.7M | 21.2M | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 6-yr range · 64th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 6-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Operating leverage needs meaningful revenue change.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SG&A | — | 33.6 | 25.0 | 19.8 | 15.3 | 12.1 | 11.1 |
| Income Tax | — | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.4 | -0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Net Income | — | 0.6 | 5.3 | 8.5 | 5.2 | -7.4 | 3.6 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on NTST: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 240 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WELL | $161.8B | 167.1× | — | 14.9× | 35.6% | 40.1% | 8.9% | 2.3% | 1.6% | — | 1,425 |
| XHG | $130.2B | — | — | 2536.8× | 24.9% | 2.2% | -205% | 85.0% | 88.3% | — | 1 |
| PLD | $125.6B | 38.0× | — | 14.3× | 7.2% | — | 37.9% | 6.3% | 3.8% | — | 1,592 |
| EQIX | $100.8B | 74.6× | 25.7× | 10.9× | 5.4% | 51.1% | 14.6% | 9.5% | 8.7% | 0.3× | 1,229 |
| AMT | $81.9B | 32.5× | 14.1× | 7.7× | 5.1% | — | 24.7% | 72.0% | 37.3% | 0.6× | 1,662 |
| SPG | $66.7B | 14.4× | — | 10.5× | 6.7% | — | 84.3% | 103% | 15.9% | — | 1,242 |
| O | $53.5B | 49.0× | — | 9.3× | 9.1% | — | 18.4% | 2.7% | 2.7% | — | 1,389 |
| PSA | $52.8B | 33.4× | — | 10.9× | 2.7% | — | 37.0% | 19.3% | 9.1% | — | 1,045 |
| VTR | $41.7B | 162.4× | — | 7.1× | 18.5% | — | 4.5% | 2.1% | 1.0% | — | 891 |
| CBRE | $41.2B | 36.2× | — | 1.0× | 13.4% | 18.7% | 2.9% | 13.0% | 7.1% | — | 1,020 |
| IRM | $33.7B | 232.7× | 22.9× | 4.9× | 12.2% | — | 2.2% | -15.5% | 1.0% | 7.5× | 1,043 |
| EXR | $29.4B | 30.3× | 13.7× | 8.7× | 3.7% | 72.8% | 28.8% | 7.3% | 7.3% | — | 722 |
| AVB | $26.6B | 25.6× | 12.2× | 8.7× | 4.4% | — | 34.7% | 9.1% | 5.0% | 3.2× | 715 |
| VICI | $25.8B | 9.2× | — | 6.4× | 4.1% | 99.3% | 69.3% | 10.0% | 6.2% | — | 898 |
| EQR | $25.6B | 23.0× | — | — | — | — | — | 10.1% | 5.8% | — | 681 |
| SBAC | $19.1B | 18.5× | 21.6× | 6.8× | 5.1% | 75.5% | 37.4% | -21.7% | 13.1% | 8.7× | 636 |
| BEKE | $17.6B | 133.3× | 37.9× | 1.3× | 5.6% | 21.4% | 3.2% | 4.5% | 4.5% | — | 197 |
| ESS | $17.5B | 26.0× | 11.5× | 9.3× | 6.4% | 69.9% | 37.2% | 12.7% | 12.7% | — | 582 |
| INVH | $16.6B | 28.3× | — | 6.1× | 4.2% | — | 21.5% | 6.2% | 3.3% | — | 560 |
| JLL | $15.8B | 20.5× | 11.8× | 0.6× | 11.4% | — | 3.0% | 10.6% | 10.4% | 0.1× | 615 |
| WY | $15.6B | 48.1× | 16.7× | 2.3× | -3.1% | 14.8% | 4.7% | 3.4% | 2.2% | 4.5× | 868 |
| KIM | $15.2B | — | 16.3× | 7.1× | 5.1% | — | 27.3% | 5.6% | 3.2% | 5.5× | 633 |
| NLY | $15.1B | 7.3× | — | — | — | — | — | 12.6% | 12.6% | — | 743 |
| HST | $15.1B | 19.9× | — | 2.5× | 7.6% | — | 12.5% | 11.7% | 9.8% | — | 656 |
| LAMR | $14.9B | 25.4× | — | 6.6× | 2.7% | 67.0% | 25.9% | 57.3% | 13.2% | — | 655 |
| NTST | $1.7B | 227.9× | — | 8.7× | 19.8% | — | 3.6% | 0.5% | 0.3% | — | 244 |
Peers = companies sharing NTST's sector (Real Estate) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.