Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional distribution: ownership decreased -1.15% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $100.55 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 14.0%/yr for a decade (off $15M normalized FCF).
The market's 14.0% is more optimistic than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.00B shares · net debt -$2M
mean 4.5% · volatility σ 23% · implied rate exceeded in 2/9 yrs
Central path = implied 14.0%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (23%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
6/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Cash conversion lags reported earnings — watch accruals. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend exceeds free cash flow (134%) — funded from the balance sheet or debt, a red flag if it persists. Last year: $19M dividends + $0 buybacks = $19M returned on $14M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: 26%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.”
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2026
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $26.3M 100.0% | $25.9M 100.0% | $29.8M 100.0% | $38.3M 100.0% | $27.0M 100.0% | $21.4M 100.0% | $25.4M 100.0% | $26.5M 100.0% | $29.9M 100.0% | $28.3M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $5.6M 21.3% | $4.2M 16.4% | $6.8M 22.7% | $8.1M 21.1% | $6.3M 23.2% | $4.1M 19.3% | $4.9M 19.2% | $5.2M 19.7% | $6.3M 21.0% | $6.1M 21.5% |
| Gross Profit | $20.7M 78.7% | $21.6M 83.6% | $23.0M 77.3% | $30.2M 78.9% | $20.7M 76.8% | $17.2M 80.7% | $20.5M 80.8% | $21.3M 80.3% | $23.6M 79.0% | $22.2M 78.5% |
| Research & Development | $3.2M 12.0% | $3.6M 14.1% | $2.7M 9.2% | $2.6M 6.8% | $2.9M 10.8% | $3.2M 14.9% | $3.7M 14.5% | $4.1M 15.5% | $3.7M 12.4% | $3.3M 11.8% |
| Selling, General & Admin | — | — | — | — | $1.5M 5.4% | $1.3M 6.2% | $1.3M 5.2% | $1.2M 4.6% | $1.4M 4.8% | $1.5M 5.1% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $4.8M 18.3% | $5.6M 21.8% | $4.5M 15.1% | $4.5M 11.9% | $4.4M 16.3% | $4.5M 21.1% | $5.0M 19.7% | $5.3M 20.1% | $5.1M 17.2% | $4.8M 17.0% |
| Operating Income | $15.9M 60.5% | $16.0M 61.8% | $18.5M 62.1% | $25.6M 67.0% | $16.3M 60.5% | $12.7M 59.6% | $15.5M 61.1% | $15.9M 60.2% | $18.5M 61.8% | $17.4M 61.6% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $1.9M 7.2% | $1.9M 7.4% | $1.9M 6.5% | $1.4M 3.8% | $1.2M 4.3% | $1.5M 7.0% | $1.8M 7.0% | $1.8M 6.7% | $1.6M 5.2% | $1.7M 5.8% |
| Pretax Income | $17.8M 67.7% | $18.0M 69.7% | $20.5M 68.7% | $27.1M 70.8% | $17.5M 64.8% | $14.2M 66.7% | $17.3M 68.1% | $17.7M 66.9% | $20.0M 67.0% | $19.1M 67.4% |
| Income Tax Expense | $2.6M 9.9% | $3.0M 11.5% | $3.3M 11.2% | $4.4M 11.5% | $3.0M 11.1% | $2.5M 11.9% | $2.8M 10.9% | $3.2M 12.1% | $6.1M 20.4% | $6.1M 21.7% |
| Net Income | $15.2M 57.7% | $15.1M 58.2% | $17.1M 57.5% | $22.7M 59.3% | $14.5M 53.8% | $11.7M 54.7% | $14.5M 57.2% | $3.6M 13.6% | $13.9M 46.6% | $12.9M 45.7% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $3.14 | $3.12 | $3.54 | $4.70 | $3.00 | $2.42 | $3.00 | $3.00 | $2.87 | $2.68 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $3.14 | $3.11 | $3.54 | $4.70 | $3.00 | $2.42 | $3.00 | $2.99 | $2.87 | $2.68 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 4.8M | 4.8M | 4.8M | 4.8M | 4.8M | 4.8M | 4.8M | 4.8M | 4.8M | 4.8M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 4.8M | 4.8M | 4.8M | 4.8M | 4.8M | 4.8M | 4.8M | 4.9M | 4.8M | 4.8M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Nothing notable to watch.
Where each multiple sits in its own 15-yr range · 100th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 15-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2026 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 19.7 | 19.2 | 19.3 | 23.2 | 21.1 | 22.7 | 16.4 | 21.3 |
| Gross Profit | 80.3 | 80.8 | 80.7 | 76.8 | 78.9 | 77.3 | 83.6 | 78.7 |
| R&D | 15.5 | 14.5 | 14.9 | 10.8 | 6.8 | 9.2 | 14.1 | 12.0 |
| SG&A | 4.6 | 5.2 | 6.2 | 5.4 | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Income | 60.2 | 61.1 | 59.6 | 60.5 | 67.0 | 62.1 | 61.8 | 60.5 |
| Income Tax | 12.1 | 10.9 | 11.9 | 11.1 | 11.5 | 11.2 | 11.5 | 9.9 |
| Net Income | 13.6 | 57.2 | 54.7 | 53.8 | 59.3 | 57.5 | 58.2 | 57.7 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on NVEC: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Ranked against 743 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSM | $10.83T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,121 |
| NVDA | $5.20T | 43.6× | 39.0× | 24.1× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.91T | 44.6× | 34.3× | 11.8× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 68.1% | 0.6× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.64T | 27.3× | 19.3× | 11.0× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 27.7% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.61T | 71.2× | 63.6× | 25.2× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.04T | 122.1× | 57.5× | 27.8× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $835.4B | 193.4× | 197.6× | 24.1× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| INTC | $504.6B | — | 62.9× | 9.6× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $426.7B | 42.3× | 35.8× | 7.5× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| PLTR | $416.9B | 276.7× | 288.5× | 93.2× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| DELL | $367.3B | 64.9× | 34.6× | 3.2× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| LRCX | $341.6B | 64.9× | 54.5× | 18.5× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 37.4% | 0.7× | 2,500 |
| AMAT | $329.4B | 48.0× | 37.9× | 11.6× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| RPAY | $325.1B | — | — | 1051.3× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -28.2% | -1.7× | 142 |
| UMC | $283.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| SAP | $261.9B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 794 |
| ARM | $259.6B | 287.0× | 223.6× | 52.8× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| PANW | $250.9B | 234.8× | 156.8× | 27.2× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| ANET | $248.2B | 71.8× | 62.7× | 27.6× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 39.0% | 28.4% | 28.4% | — | 1,930 |
| TXN | $236.9B | 47.8× | 31.2× | 13.4× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.5% | 1.8× | 2,345 |
| CRM | $232.8B | 32.1× | 25.2× | 5.6× | 9.6% | 77.7% | 18.0% | 12.6% | 10.1% | 1.5× | 2,547 |
| IBM | $222.5B | 21.3× | — | 3.3× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| SNDK | $221.9B | — | — | 30.2× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.8% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| QCOM | $198.5B | 36.9× | 14.9× | 4.5× | 13.7% | 55.4% | 12.5% | 26.1% | 15.4% | 1.1× | 2,611 |
| MRVL | $194.6B | 74.8× | 127.2× | 23.8× | 42.1% | 51.0% | 32.6% | 18.7% | 14.2% | 2.9× | 1,477 |
| NVEC | $472M | 31.1× | 28.7× | 17.9× | 1.8% | 78.7% | 57.7% | 26.1% | 26.1% | — | 117 |
Peers = companies sharing NVEC's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.