Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional accumulation: ownership increased +2.72% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $87.62 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 15.7%/yr for a decade (off $34M normalized FCF).
The market's 15.7% is more optimistic than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.01B shares (market data) · net debt -$50M
mean -9.2% · volatility σ 106% · implied rate exceeded in 2/6 yrs
Central path = implied 15.7%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (106%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
7/7 of the 9 checks — 2 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 7 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash conversion lags reported earnings — watch accruals. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 18% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $8M dividends + $2M buybacks = $11M returned on $48M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 21%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $50M covers all $19M of scheduled principal — no refinancing pressure. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2015-07-31 (10-K).
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Nothing notable to watch.
No material risks flagged.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 2.9× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 73.0 | 76.3 | 75.7 | 78.6 | 82.1 | 75.0 | 71.4 | 70.5 |
| Gross Profit | 27.0 | 23.7 | 24.3 | 21.4 | 17.9 | 25.0 | 28.6 | 29.5 |
| R&D | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| SG&A | 21.1 | 19.9 | 20.1 | 17.1 | 14.9 | 15.1 | 16.8 | 15.4 |
| Operating Income | 6.0 | 3.8 | 8.8 | 4.3 | 1.4 | 9.9 | 11.8 | 14.0 |
| Income Tax | 2.5 | 0.7 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 2.3 | 2.5 |
| Net Income | 3.1 | 4.6 | 6.7 | 3.6 | 1.6 | 7.2 | 9.0 | 11.1 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on ODC: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $485.6M 100.0% | $437.6M 100.0% | $413.0M 100.0% | $348.6M 100.0% | $305.0M 100.0% | $283.2M 100.0% | $277.0M 100.0% | $266.0M 100.0% | $262.3M 100.0% | $262.3M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $342.5M 70.5% | $312.5M 71.4% | $309.8M 75.0% | $286.1M 82.1% | $239.7M 78.6% | $214.5M 75.7% | $211.4M 76.3% | $194.1M 73.0% | $188.6M 71.9% | $185.2M 70.6% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $194.0M 72.9% | $188.6M 71.9% | $185.2M 70.6% |
| Gross Profit | $143.1M 29.5% | $125.1M 28.6% | $103.2M 25.0% | $62.5M 17.9% | $65.2M 21.4% | $68.7M 24.3% | $65.7M 23.7% | $71.9M 27.0% | $73.7M 28.1% | $77.1M 29.4% |
| Research & Development | $2.4M 0.5% | $2.1M 0.5% | $1.2M 0.3% | $2.1M 0.6% | $2.5M 0.8% | $2.8M 1.0% | $3.2M 1.2% | $3.4M 1.3% | $3.2M 1.2% | $3.0M 1.2% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $74.9M 15.4% | $73.4M 16.8% | $62.2M 15.1% | $52.0M 14.9% | $52.2M 17.1% | $56.9M 20.1% | $55.2M 19.9% | $56.0M 21.1% | $58.5M 22.3% | $61.7M 23.5% |
| Operating Income | $68.2M 14.0% | $51.6M 11.8% | $41.0M 9.9% | $4.8M 1.4% | $13.0M 4.3% | $24.8M 8.8% | $10.4M 3.8% | $15.9M 6.0% | $15.2M 5.8% | $15.4M 5.9% |
| Interest Expense | $2.4M 0.5% | $1.8M 0.4% | $1.5M 0.4% | $1.2M 0.4% | $722K 0.2% | $518K 0.2% | $594K 0.2% | $676K 0.3% | $888K 0.3% | $1.0M 0.4% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $698K 0.1% | $873K 0.2% | $465K 0.1% | $45K 0.0% | $71K 0.0% | $259K 0.1% | $250K 0.1% | $259K 0.1% | $95K 0.0% | $29K 0.0% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$2.0M -0.4% | -$2.0M -0.5% | -$6.4M -1.5% | $888K 0.3% | $332K 0.1% | -$1.8M -0.6% | $4.1M 1.5% | -$1.0M -0.4% | -$685K -0.3% | -$1.1M -0.4% |
| Pretax Income | $66.2M 13.6% | $49.7M 11.3% | $34.7M 8.4% | $5.7M 1.6% | $13.4M 4.4% | $23.0M 8.1% | $14.5M 5.3% | $14.9M 5.6% | $14.5M 5.5% | $14.4M 5.5% |
| Income Tax Expense | $12.2M 2.5% | $10.2M 2.3% | $5.2M 1.3% | $97K 0.0% | $2.4M 0.8% | $4.3M 1.5% | $1.9M 0.7% | $6.6M 2.5% | $3.8M 1.4% | $744K 0.3% |
| Net Income | $54.0M 11.1% | $39.4M 9.0% | $29.6M 7.2% | $5.7M 1.6% | $11.1M 3.6% | $18.9M 6.7% | $12.6M 4.6% | $8.2M 3.1% | $10.8M 4.1% | $13.6M 5.2% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Diluted) | — | — | — | — | — | — | $1.67 | $1.11 | $1.47 | $1.87 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7.3M | 7.2M | 7.2M | 7.1M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 238 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BHP | $439.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 713 |
| LIN | $215.3B | 31.4× | 19.3× | 6.3× | 3.0% | — | 20.3% | 18.0% | 10.9% | 2.1× | 2,148 |
| SCCO | $162.1B | 37.4× | 20.9× | 12.1× | 17.4% | 60.1% | 32.4% | 39.4% | 24.4% | 0.9× | 791 |
| CX | $147.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 297 |
| TX | $116.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 139 |
| FCX | $101.8B | — | 12.3× | 3.9× | 1.8% | 28.2% | 16.0% | 22.0% | 14.7% | 1.1× | 1,775 |
| AEM | $100.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,066 |
| SHW | $79.5B | 31.3× | — | 3.4× | 2.1% | 48.8% | 10.9% | 55.9% | 17.0% | — | 1,610 |
| ECL | $76.6B | 37.3× | 22.5× | 4.8× | 2.2% | 44.5% | 12.9% | 21.2% | 19.5% | 0.3× | 1,619 |
| B | $73.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 979 |
| WPM | $69.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 809 |
| APD | $63.7B | — | 90.0× | 5.3× | -0.5% | 31.4% | -3.3% | -2.6% | -2.6% | 0.1× | 1,702 |
| VALE | $61.6B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 537 |
| NUE | $61.2B | 35.3× | — | 1.9× | 5.7% | 11.9% | 5.4% | 8.3% | 8.3% | — | 1,325 |
| CRH | $58.0B | 15.7× | 9.3× | 1.6× | 5.3% | 36.1% | 10.0% | 15.6% | 9.2% | 2.2× | 9 |
| MT | $57.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 286 |
| DD | $53.6B | — | — | 7.8× | 1.9% | 34.5% | -11.4% | -5.6% | -5.6% | — | 1,172 |
| AU | $51.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 537 |
| FNV | $51.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 614 |
| NTR | $37.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 718 |
| STLD | $35.6B | 30.7× | 19.2× | 2.0× | 3.6% | 13.2% | 6.5% | 13.2% | 9.0% | 2.1× | 893 |
| KGC | $34.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 630 |
| VMC | $31.9B | 30.1× | 15.3× | 4.0× | 7.1% | 27.4% | 13.6% | 12.6% | 8.4% | 1.8× | 981 |
| MLM | $29.8B | 26.3× | 16.9× | 4.8× | 8.6% | 30.7% | 18.5% | 11.3% | 7.4% | 2.6× | 1,022 |
| PPG | $23.6B | 15.2× | — | 1.5× | 0.2% | 41.3% | 9.9% | 19.8% | 10.3% | — | 1,003 |
| ODC | $1.3B | — | 13.7× | 2.6× | 11.0% | 29.5% | 11.1% | 20.8% | 20.8% | — | 133 |
Peers = companies sharing ODC's sector (Basic Materials) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.