Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional ownership roughly stable: -0.11% change quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $25.89 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds -0.3%/yr for a decade (off $19M normalized FCF).
The market's -0.3% is in line with its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.01B shares · net debt -$53M
mean 4.8% · volatility σ 31% · implied rate exceeded in 5/9 yrs
Central path = implied -0.3%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (31%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
5/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend takes 89% of free cash flow — sustainable but with limited headroom. Last year: $14M dividends + $0 buybacks = $14M returned on $15M FCF.
3 consecutive years of dividend increases · 5%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: 18%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.”
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $98.3M 100.0% | $101.7M 100.0% | $111.5M 100.0% | $125.5M 100.0% | $130.0M 100.0% | $105.8M 100.0% | $111.4M 100.0% | $108.3M 100.0% | $101.8M 100.0% | $94.1M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $39.3M 40.0% | $39.4M 38.8% | $43.1M 38.7% | $47.2M 37.6% | $48.5M 37.3% | $39.2M 37.1% | $40.9M 36.7% | $42.2M 39.0% | $40.0M 39.3% | $36.2M 38.5% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $40.0M 39.3% | $36.2M 38.5% |
| Gross Profit | $59.0M 60.0% | $62.3M 61.2% | $68.4M 61.3% | $78.3M 62.4% | $81.5M 62.7% | $66.5M 62.9% | $70.5M 63.3% | $66.1M 61.0% | $61.8M 60.7% | $57.9M 61.5% |
| Research & Development | $1.3M 1.3% | $301K 0.3% | $433K 0.4% | $653K 0.5% | $627K 0.5% | $831K 0.8% | $1.2M 1.1% | $1.5M 1.4% | $923K 0.9% | $788K 0.8% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $16.3M 16.6% | $16.1M 15.8% | $17.7M 15.9% | $20.6M 16.4% | $21.4M 16.5% | $19.1M 18.1% | $24.8M 22.3% | $17.8M 16.4% | $17.9M 17.6% | $17.1M 18.2% |
| Operating Income | $16.9M 17.2% | $21.6M 21.2% | $25.8M 23.1% | $31.0M 24.7% | $35.1M 27.0% | $26.7M 25.2% | $21.9M 19.7% | $26.4M 24.3% | $24.2M 23.8% | $21.9M 23.3% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $331K 0.3% | -$227K -0.2% | $46K 0.0% | -$211K -0.2% | $21K 0.0% | -$53K -0.1% | $56K 0.1% | -$126K -0.1% | -$38K -0.0% | -$474K -0.5% |
| Pretax Income | $19.3M 19.6% | $23.6M 23.2% | $27.5M 24.7% | $31.0M 24.7% | $35.1M 27.0% | $26.6M 25.1% | $22.9M 20.5% | $26.7M 24.7% | $24.3M 23.9% | $21.5M 22.9% |
| Income Tax Expense | $4.7M 4.7% | $5.7M 5.6% | $6.8M 6.1% | $7.3M 5.8% | $8.9M 6.8% | $6.6M 6.2% | $5.4M 4.9% | $6.5M 6.0% | $8.4M 8.3% | $7.0M 7.4% |
| Net Income | $14.8M 15.1% | $18.0M 17.7% | $20.8M 18.6% | $23.6M 18.8% | $26.2M 20.1% | $19.9M 18.8% | $17.3M 15.5% | $20.1M 18.6% | $15.7M 15.4% | $14.4M 15.3% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $1.47 | $1.78 | $2.06 | $2.34 | $2.60 | $1.97 | — | — | — | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | $1.47 | $1.78 | $2.06 | $2.34 | $2.60 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 10.1M | 10.1M | 10.1M | 10.1M | 10.1M | 10.1M | — | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 10.1M | 10.1M | 10.1M | 10.1M | 10.1M | — | — | — | — | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Ranked against 651 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTM | $28.75T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 160 |
| CAT | $364.2B | 41.6× | 29.1× | 5.4× | 4.3% | 33.8% | 13.1% | 41.7% | 15.4% | 2.7× | 3,616 |
| GE | $328.2B | 38.4× | — | 7.2× | 18.5% | — | 19.0% | 46.6% | 22.2% | — | 3,077 |
| RTX | $264.2B | 39.7× | 18.8× | 3.0× | 9.7% | — | 7.6% | 10.3% | 10.3% | 0.0× | 3,277 |
| BA | $204.4B | 81.4× | 41.0× | 2.3× | 34.5% | 4.8% | 2.5% | 41.0% | 3.3% | 10.0× | 2,435 |
| DE | $181.0B | 36.2× | — | 4.0× | -11.7% | — | 11.0% | 19.4% | 12.6% | — | 2,491 |
| ABBNY | $174.3B | 47.1× | 31.1× | 5.4× | 9.5% | 34.8% | 11.9% | 28.5% | 20.4% | 0.9× | 48 |
| UNP | $166.7B | 23.4× | 16.0× | 6.8× | 1.1% | — | 29.1% | 38.7% | 14.2% | 2.6× | 2,648 |
| ETN | $154.3B | 38.1× | — | 5.6× | 10.3% | 37.6% | 14.9% | 21.0% | 13.9% | — | 2,398 |
| HON | $131.9B | 28.2× | 16.2× | 3.5× | 7.8% | 36.9% | 12.6% | 34.0% | 9.8% | 3.6× | 2,694 |
| LMT | $123.0B | 25.0× | 16.1× | 1.6× | 5.6% | 10.2% | 6.7% | 74.6% | 17.7% | 2.5× | 2,807 |
| PH | $117.9B | 33.9× | 26.6× | 5.9× | -0.4% | 36.9% | 17.8% | 25.8% | 16.7% | 1.6× | 1,845 |
| ADP | $108.7B | 25.0× | — | 5.0× | 6.7% | 46.4% | 20.1% | 73.2% | 40.1% | — | 2,179 |
| GD | $97.3B | 23.3× | 17.1× | 1.9× | 10.1% | — | 8.0% | 16.4% | 12.5% | 1.3× | 2,123 |
| TT | $94.0B | 32.5× | 23.2× | 4.4× | 7.5% | — | 13.7% | 34.0% | 22.1% | 1.1× | 1,658 |
| PWR | $92.6B | 91.1× | 46.0× | 3.3× | 20.3% | 15.0% | 3.6% | 11.5% | 10.6% | 0.4× | 1,659 |
| VRT | $91.6B | 70.2× | 43.4× | 8.9× | 27.7% | 36.3% | 13.0% | 33.8% | 19.4% | 1.4× | 1,748 |
| JCI | $91.6B | 27.9× | — | 3.9× | 2.8% | 36.4% | 13.9% | 25.5% | 14.4% | — | 1,487 |
| HWM | $91.5B | 61.4× | 40.3× | 11.1× | 11.1% | — | 18.3% | 28.2% | 17.9% | 1.3× | 1,399 |
| CSX | $89.1B | 31.1× | 14.4× | 6.3× | -3.1% | — | 20.5% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 1,791 |
| MMM | $86.2B | 27.1× | 16.6× | 3.5× | 1.5% | 39.9% | 13.0% | 69.1% | 18.8% | 2.1× | 2,051 |
| WM | $86.2B | 31.9× | 12.1× | 3.4× | 14.2% | 40.4% | 10.7% | 27.1% | 25.3% | 0.1× | 2,262 |
| UPS | $83.9B | 15.1× | 9.4× | 0.9× | -2.6% | — | 6.3% | 34.3% | 13.8% | 2.2× | 2,025 |
| EMR | $82.1B | 36.1× | — | 4.6× | 3.0% | 52.8% | 12.7% | 11.3% | 6.9% | — | 2,112 |
| CTAS | $80.4B | 45.3× | 28.9× | 7.8× | 7.7% | 50.0% | 17.5% | 38.7% | 25.5% | 0.8× | 1,366 |
| OFLX | $265M | 17.9× | 11.6× | 2.7× | -3.3% | 60.0% | 15.1% | 17.6% | 17.6% | — | 104 |
Peers = companies sharing OFLX's sector (Industrials) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 10th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 6.5× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 39.0 | 36.7 | 37.1 | 37.3 | 37.6 | 38.7 | 38.8 | 40.0 |
| Gross Profit | 61.0 | 63.3 | 62.9 | 62.7 | 62.4 | 61.3 | 61.2 | 60.0 |
| R&D | 1.4 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 1.3 |
| SG&A | 16.4 | 22.3 | 18.1 | 16.5 | 16.4 | 15.9 | 15.8 | 16.6 |
| Operating Income | 24.3 | 19.7 | 25.2 | 27.0 | 24.7 | 23.1 | 21.2 | 17.2 |
| Income Tax | 6.0 | 4.9 | 6.2 | 6.8 | 5.8 | 6.1 | 5.6 | 4.7 |
| Net Income | 18.6 | 15.5 | 18.8 | 20.1 | 18.8 | 18.6 | 17.7 | 15.1 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on OFLX: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.