Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 343 of 5,944 reporting institutions (95th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $46.20 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 14.2%/yr for a decade (off $138M normalized FCF).
The market's 14.2% is more optimistic than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.10B shares · net debt -$201M
mean 81.1% · volatility σ 278% · implied rate exceeded in 4/8 yrs
Central path = implied 14.2%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (278%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash conversion lags reported earnings — watch accruals. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $40M buybacks = $40M returned on $208M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 23%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit. Effective rate ~7.6% on $487M of debt.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.78B 100.0% | $2.66B 100.0% | $2.42B 100.0% | $2.07B 100.0% | $1.87B 100.0% | $1.83B 100.0% | $2.05B 100.0% | $1.91B 100.0% | $1.92B 100.0% | $2.27B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $2.22B 79.6% | $2.18B 81.8% | $2.03B 83.5% | $1.76B 85.1% | $1.61B 85.9% | $1.66B 91.0% | $1.95B 95.2% | $1.78B 93.2% | $1.73B 89.9% | $1.99B 87.7% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $578.2M 30.3% | $625.8M 32.6% | $615.4M 27.1% |
| Cost of Services | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $1.14B 59.4% | $1.04B 54.2% | $1.33B 58.6% |
| Gross Profit | $568.4M 20.4% | $485.5M 18.2% | $399.0M 16.5% | $307.4M 14.9% | $264.1M 14.1% | $163.9M 9.0% | $98.2M 4.8% | $129.2M 6.8% | $194.6M 10.1% | $279.2M 12.3% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $263.9M 9.5% | $239.2M 9.0% | $217.6M 9.0% | $196.5M 9.5% | $224.3M 12.0% | $195.7M 10.7% | $214.9M 10.5% | $198.3M 10.4% | $184.0M 9.6% | $208.5M 9.2% |
| Operating Income | $304.6M 10.9% | $246.3M 9.3% | $181.3M 7.5% | $110.9M 5.4% | $39.8M 2.1% | -$446.1M -24.4% | -$290.7M -14.2% | -$145.5M -7.6% | $10.7M 0.6% | $70.8M 3.1% |
| Interest Expense | $37.0M 1.3% | $37.9M 1.4% | $36.5M 1.5% | $38.2M 1.8% | $38.8M 2.1% | $43.9M 2.4% | $42.7M 2.1% | $37.7M 2.0% | $27.8M 1.4% | $25.3M 1.1% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $14.5M 0.5% | $12.1M 0.5% | $15.4M 0.6% | $5.7M 0.3% | $2.5M 0.1% | $3.1M 0.2% | $7.9M 0.4% | $10.0M 0.5% | $7.4M 0.4% | $3.9M 0.2% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | — | — | — | — | — | — | -$6.6M -0.3% | -$8.8M -0.5% | -$6.1M -0.3% | -$6.2M -0.3% |
| Income Tax Expense | -$67.9M -2.4% | $77.4M 2.9% | $63.7M 2.6% | $53.1M 2.6% | $43.6M 2.3% | -$2.1M -0.1% | $17.6M 0.9% | $26.5M 1.4% | -$184.2M -9.6% | $18.8M 0.8% |
| Net Income | $353.8M 12.7% | $147.5M 5.5% | $97.4M 4.0% | $25.9M 1.3% | -$49.3M -2.6% | -$496.8M -27.2% | -$348.4M -17.0% | -$212.3M -11.1% | $166.4M 8.7% | $24.6M 1.1% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $3.53 | $1.46 | $0.97 | $0.26 | $-0.49 | $-5.01 | $-3.52 | $-2.16 | $1.69 | $0.25 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $3.49 | $1.44 | $0.95 | $0.26 | $-0.49 | $-5.01 | $-3.52 | $-2.16 | $1.68 | $0.25 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 100.2M | 101.2M | 100.7M | 100.2M | 99.7M | 99.2M | 98.9M | 98.5M | 98.2M | 98.0M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 101.3M | 102.4M | 102.2M | 101.4M | 99.7M | 99.2M | 98.9M | 98.5M | 98.8M | 98.4M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 238 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XOM | $682.3B | 24.4× | — | 2.0× | -5.0% | — | 8.7% | 11.1% | 10.7% | — | 4,568 |
| SHEL | $545.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,521 |
| CVX | $391.2B | 31.9× | — | 2.1× | -6.8% | 42.8% | 6.5% | 6.6% | 6.6% | — | 4,121 |
| TTE | $202.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 951 |
| COP | $166.8B | 21.0× | — | 2.8× | 7.7% | 62.1% | 13.6% | 12.4% | 12.2% | — | 2,450 |
| PBR | $155.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 524 |
| MPC | $128.7B | 31.9× | 11.0× | 1.0× | -4.4% | 10.0% | 3.0% | 23.4% | 20.6% | 0.2× | 1,802 |
| VLO | $127.5B | 54.5× | 24.1× | 1.0× | -5.5% | 4.4% | 1.9% | 9.9% | 7.1% | 1.7× | 1,781 |
| BP | $117.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,220 |
| PSX | $111.3B | 25.4× | — | 0.8× | -7.5% | 12.3% | 3.3% | 15.1% | 14.6% | — | 2,041 |
| EQNR | $110.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 398 |
| WMB | $87.7B | 33.6× | 17.8× | 7.3× | 13.8% | — | 21.9% | 20.4% | 6.3% | 4.4× | 1,736 |
| EPD | $84.1B | — | 12.6× | 1.6× | -6.4% | 26.7% | 11.0% | — | — | 3.7× | 1,573 |
| EOG | $79.0B | 15.9× | 7.7× | 3.5× | -4.5% | — | 22.0% | 16.7% | 13.2% | 0.7× | 1,525 |
| SLB | $77.9B | 22.2× | — | 2.2× | -1.6% | — | 9.4% | 12.9% | 9.4% | — | 1,624 |
| ET | $72.5B | — | 9.8× | 0.8× | 3.5% | 25.8% | 5.2% | 9.0% | 3.8% | 4.8× | 1,244 |
| KMI | $69.7B | 22.9× | 14.2× | 4.1× | 12.2% | — | 18.0% | 9.8% | 4.8% | 4.5× | 1,745 |
| TRGP | $61.2B | 33.6× | 16.2× | 3.6× | 3.9% | 38.3% | 11.3% | 62.7% | 9.4% | 3.6× | 979 |
| TS | $60.6B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 248 |
| MPLX | $59.4B | — | — | 4.6× | 8.9% | — | 38.1% | — | — | — | 622 |
| LNG | $59.3B | 11.2× | 7.8× | 3.0× | 27.2% | — | 26.7% | 67.3% | 17.3% | 2.2× | 1,303 |
| OKE | $58.7B | 17.2× | 12.4× | 1.8× | 55.0% | 30.5% | 10.1% | 15.1% | 6.3% | 4.4× | 1,622 |
| OXY | $58.5B | 36.8× | — | 2.7× | -1.9% | — | 11.0% | 6.6% | 4.2% | — | 1,250 |
| BKR | $56.2B | — | — | 2.0× | -0.3% | — | 9.3% | 13.7% | 13.3% | — | 1,095 |
| FANG | $56.0B | 34.4× | 11.2× | 3.7× | 35.8% | — | 11.1% | 4.5% | 3.2% | 2.3× | 1,141 |
| OII | $4.6B | 13.2× | 10.9× | 1.7× | 4.6% | 20.4% | 12.7% | 33.0% | 22.7% | 1.2× | 343 |
Peers = companies sharing OII's sector (Energy) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 69th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 5.1× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 93.2 | 95.2 | 91.0 | 85.9 | 85.1 | 83.5 | 81.8 | 79.6 |
| Gross Profit | 6.8 | 4.8 | 9.0 | 14.1 | 14.9 | 16.5 | 18.2 | 20.4 |
| SG&A | 10.4 | 10.5 | 10.7 | 12.0 | 9.5 | 9.0 | 9.0 | 9.5 |
| Operating Income | -7.6 | -14.2 | -24.4 | 2.1 | 5.4 | 7.5 | 9.3 | 10.9 |
| Income Tax | 1.4 | 0.9 | -0.1 | 2.3 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 2.9 | -2.4 |
| Net Income | -11.1 | -17.0 | -27.2 | -2.6 | 1.3 | 4.0 | 5.5 | 12.7 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on OII: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.