Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Strong institutional distribution: ownership decreased -9.42% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
5/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81 · book equity (no price)
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $22M buybacks = $22M returned on $4M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 7 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -21%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 7 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $37M covers all $643000 of scheduled principal — no refinancing pressure. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2021-09-30 (10-Q).
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
No current price collected.
Where each multiple sits in its own 5-yr range
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 5-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 5.0× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 30.5 | 21.2 | 23.3 | 27.7 | 28.3 | 25.7 | 25.4 |
| Gross Profit | 69.5 | 78.8 | 76.7 | 72.3 | 71.7 | 74.3 | 74.6 |
| R&D | 17.6 | 12.3 | 17.1 | 23.1 | 25.1 | 24.5 | 23.7 |
| SG&A | 16.4 | 13.9 | 20.1 | 23.0 | 30.0 | 31.3 | 27.8 |
| Operating Income | -18.1 | 13.9 | -11.6 | -31.2 | -37.9 | -34.2 | -25.7 |
| Income Tax | 0.4 | 0.2 | -0.1 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.3 |
| Net Income | -19.7 | 13.2 | -11.9 | -30.5 | -31.6 | -28.5 | -20.7 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on ONTF: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $139.3M 100.0% | $148.1M 100.0% | $163.7M 100.0% | $190.9M 100.0% | $203.6M 100.0% | $156.9M 100.0% | $89.1M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $35.3M 25.4% | $38.0M 25.7% | $46.3M 28.3% | $52.8M 27.7% | $47.4M 23.3% | $33.3M 21.2% | $27.1M 30.5% |
| Gross Profit | $104.0M 74.6% | $110.1M 74.3% | $117.4M 71.7% | $138.1M 72.3% | $156.2M 76.7% | $123.6M 78.8% | $62.0M 69.5% |
| Research & Development | $33.0M 23.7% | $36.3M 24.5% | $41.1M 25.1% | $44.1M 23.1% | $34.8M 17.1% | $19.3M 12.3% | $15.7M 17.6% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $38.7M 27.8% | $46.4M 31.3% | $49.1M 30.0% | $44.0M 23.0% | $40.9M 20.1% | $21.8M 13.9% | $14.6M 16.4% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $139.7M 100.3% | $160.7M 108.5% | $179.4M 109.6% | $197.7M 103.6% | $179.8M 88.3% | $101.8M 64.8% | $78.1M 87.6% |
| Operating Income | -$35.8M -25.7% | -$50.7M -34.2% | -$62.0M -37.9% | -$59.6M -31.2% | -$23.6M -11.6% | $21.8M 13.9% | -$16.1M -18.1% |
| Interest Expense | $163K 0.1% | $34K 0.0% | $93K 0.1% | $181K 0.1% | $464K 0.2% | $869K 0.6% | $1.0M 1.2% |
| Interest & Investment Income | — | — | — | $1.9M 1.0% | $685K 0.3% | $0 0.0% | — |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $7.5M 5.4% | $9.2M 6.2% | $11.3M 6.9% | $2.5M 1.3% | -$487K -0.2% | $76K 0.0% | -$42K -0.0% |
| Pretax Income | -$28.5M -20.4% | -$41.5M -28.0% | -$50.8M -31.0% | -$57.3M -30.0% | -$24.5M -12.1% | $21.1M 13.4% | -$17.2M -19.3% |
| Income Tax Expense | $398K 0.3% | $633K 0.4% | $995K 0.6% | $958K 0.5% | -$285K -0.1% | $297K 0.2% | $355K 0.4% |
| Net Income | -$28.9M -20.7% | -$42.2M -28.5% | -$51.8M -31.6% | -$58.2M -30.5% | -$24.3M -11.9% | $20.8M 13.2% | -$17.5M -19.7% |
| Per Share | |||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-0.68 | $-1.01 | $-1.16 | $-1.23 | $-0.57 | $0.40 | $-3.68 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-0.68 | $-1.01 | $-1.16 | $-1.23 | $-0.57 | $0.35 | $-3.68 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 42.4M | 41.8M | 44.6M | 47.5M | 43.6M | 10.0M | 8.8M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 42.4M | 41.8M | 44.6M | 47.5M | 43.6M | 16.2M | 8.8M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 743 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSM | $10.83T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,121 |
| NVDA | $5.20T | 43.6× | 39.0× | 24.1× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.98T | 45.2× | 34.8× | 12.0× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 68.1% | 0.6× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.64T | 27.3× | 19.3× | 11.0× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 27.7% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.65T | 72.8× | 65.1× | 25.8× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.04T | 122.1× | 57.5× | 27.8× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $888.5B | 205.7× | 210.2× | 25.6× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| INTC | $543.3B | — | 67.4× | 10.3× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $436.6B | 43.2× | 36.6× | 7.7× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| PLTR | $416.9B | 276.7× | 288.5× | 93.2× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| DELL | $383.6B | 67.8× | 36.1× | 3.4× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| LRCX | $341.7B | 64.9× | 54.5× | 18.5× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 37.4% | 0.7× | 2,500 |
| AMAT | $331.0B | 48.2× | 38.1× | 11.7× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| RPAY | $325.1B | — | — | 1051.3× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -28.2% | -1.7× | 142 |
| UMC | $283.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| ARM | $281.9B | 311.6× | 242.9× | 57.3× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| SAP | $261.9B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 794 |
| PANW | $250.9B | 234.8× | 156.8× | 27.2× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| ANET | $250.7B | 72.6× | 63.3× | 27.8× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 39.0% | 28.4% | 28.4% | — | 1,930 |
| TXN | $236.9B | 47.8× | 31.2× | 13.4× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.5% | 1.8× | 2,345 |
| CRM | $225.6B | 31.1× | 24.4× | 5.4× | 9.6% | 77.7% | 18.0% | 12.6% | 10.1% | 1.5× | 2,547 |
| IBM | $222.8B | 21.3× | — | 3.3× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| SNDK | $221.9B | — | — | 30.2× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.8% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| QCOM | $198.5B | 36.9× | 14.9× | 4.5× | 13.7% | 55.4% | 12.5% | 26.1% | 15.4% | 1.1× | 2,611 |
| MRVL | $194.6B | 74.8× | 127.2× | 23.8× | 42.1% | 51.0% | 32.6% | 18.7% | 14.2% | 2.9× | 1,477 |
| ONTF | — | — | — | — | -5.9% | 74.6% | -20.7% | -20.7% | -20.7% | — | 122 |
Peers = companies sharing ONTF's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.