Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional distribution: ownership decreased -1.20% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $22.35 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 17.3%/yr for a decade (off $16M normalized FCF).
The market's 17.3% is more conservative than its 8-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.03B shares · net debt $38M
mean -80.3% · volatility σ 428% · implied rate exceeded in 4/6 yrs
Central path = implied 17.3%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (428%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $12M buybacks = $12M returned on $22M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 4%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Interest last disclosed in FY2017 (no longer broken out).
Cash of $20M fully covers short-term debt of $6M.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2026 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 40.8 | 41.0 | 38.0 | 38.4 | 36.3 | 37.8 | 39.3 | 38.9 |
| Gross Profit | 59.2 | 59.0 | 62.0 | 61.6 | 63.7 | 62.2 | 60.7 | 61.1 |
| R&D | 26.2 | 24.9 | 21.4 | 19.9 | 21.3 | 21.1 | 21.1 | 18.4 |
| SG&A | 13.6 | 13.7 | 12.2 | 12.2 | 12.9 | 11.7 | 12.2 | 12.6 |
| Operating Income | -12.2 | -13.0 | -1.6 | -1.0 | -2.7 | -1.7 | -2.7 | 1.6 |
| Income Tax | -0.3 | -0.1 | 0.1 | — | -0.8 | -0.8 | 0.3 | -0.8 |
| Net Income | -11.3 | -12.4 | -1.4 | -0.9 | -1.7 | -0.4 | -2.7 | 2.4 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on OOMA: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2026
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $273.6M 100.0% | $256.9M 100.0% | $236.7M 100.0% | $216.2M 100.0% | $192.3M 100.0% | $168.9M 100.0% | $151.6M 100.0% | $129.2M 100.0% | $114.5M 100.0% | $104.5M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $106.4M 38.9% | $100.8M 39.3% | $89.5M 37.8% | $78.5M 36.3% | $73.9M 38.4% | $64.1M 38.0% | $62.2M 41.0% | $52.7M 40.8% | $46.4M 40.5% | $45.2M 43.2% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $15.0M 13.1% | $15.5M 14.9% |
| Gross Profit | $167.2M 61.1% | $156.0M 60.7% | $147.2M 62.2% | $137.6M 63.7% | $118.4M 61.6% | $104.8M 62.0% | $89.4M 59.0% | $76.5M 59.2% | $68.1M 59.5% | $59.3M 56.8% |
| Research & Development | $50.3M 18.4% | $54.3M 21.1% | $49.9M 21.1% | $45.9M 21.3% | $38.2M 19.9% | $36.1M 21.4% | $37.8M 24.9% | $33.9M 26.2% | $29.3M 25.6% | $24.2M 23.2% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $34.4M 12.6% | $31.3M 12.2% | $27.8M 11.7% | $27.8M 12.9% | $23.5M 12.2% | $20.6M 12.2% | $20.8M 13.7% | $17.6M 13.6% | $15.2M 13.3% | $14.6M 14.0% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $163.0M 59.6% | $163.0M 63.4% | $151.2M 63.9% | $143.4M 66.3% | $120.4M 62.6% | $107.6M 63.7% | $109.1M 72.0% | $92.3M 71.4% | $81.8M 71.5% | $72.6M 69.5% |
| Operating Income | $4.3M 1.6% | -$6.9M -2.7% | -$4.0M -1.7% | -$5.8M -2.7% | -$1.9M -1.0% | -$2.8M -1.6% | -$19.7M -13.0% | -$15.8M -12.2% | -$13.7M -12.0% | -$13.3M -12.7% |
| Interest Expense | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $18K 0.0% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -$43K -0.0% |
| Pretax Income | $4.4M 1.6% | -$6.1M -2.4% | -$2.8M -1.2% | -$5.4M -2.5% | -$1.8M -0.9% | -$2.4M -1.4% | -$18.9M -12.5% | -$15.0M -11.6% | -$13.1M -11.5% | -$12.9M -12.4% |
| Income Tax Expense | -$2.1M -0.8% | $760K 0.3% | -$2.0M -0.8% | -$1.8M -0.8% | — | $85K 0.1% | -$130K -0.1% | -$384K -0.3% | $3K 0.0% | — |
| Net Income | $6.5M 2.4% | -$6.9M -2.7% | -$840K -0.4% | -$3.7M -1.7% | -$1.8M -0.9% | -$2.4M -1.4% | -$18.8M -12.4% | -$14.6M -11.3% | -$13.1M -11.5% | -$12.9M -12.4% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $0.23 | $-0.26 | $-0.03 | $-0.15 | $-0.07 | $-0.11 | — | — | — | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | $0.23 | $-0.26 | $-0.03 | $-0.15 | $-0.07 | $-0.11 | — | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 27.6M | 26.7M | 25.6M | 24.5M | 23.5M | 22.4M | — | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 28.1M | 26.7M | 25.6M | 24.5M | 23.5M | 22.4M | — | — | — | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 192 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOOG | $4.15T | 31.8× | 27.8× | 10.3× | 15.1% | 59.7% | 32.8% | 31.8% | 28.5% | 0.3× | 4,874 |
| META | $1.72T | 29.1× | 17.1× | 8.6× | 22.2% | 82.0% | 30.1% | 27.8% | 21.9% | 0.6× | 4,839 |
| AMX | $1.40T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 318 |
| CHT | $354.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 206 |
| NFLX | $318.0B | 29.8× | 23.7× | 7.0× | 15.9% | 48.5% | 24.3% | 41.3% | 26.7% | 1.1× | 3,458 |
| CCZ | $239.2B | 12.0× | 6.4× | 1.9× | -0.0% | — | 16.2% | 20.6% | 19.4% | 0.2× | 1 |
| VZ | $210.3B | 12.3× | 4.3× | 1.5× | 2.5% | — | 12.4% | 16.2% | 16.2% | 0.0× | 3,122 |
| DIS | $200.2B | 15.4× | 10.3× | 2.1× | 3.4% | — | 13.1% | 11.3% | 8.2% | 1.8× | 2,883 |
| TMUS | $195.1B | 18.1× | 8.7× | 2.2× | 8.5% | — | 12.4% | 18.6% | 7.6% | 2.7× | 1,648 |
| T | $185.4B | 8.5× | 6.9× | 1.5× | 2.7% | — | 17.5% | 17.4% | 8.1% | 3.2× | 2,848 |
| VEON | $126.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 97 |
| DASH | $83.1B | 91.3× | 53.5× | 6.1× | 27.9% | — | 6.8% | 9.3% | 9.3% | — | 973 |
| WBD | $69.6B | 96.8× | 15.2× | 1.9× | -5.1% | — | 1.9% | 2.0% | 1.1% | 5.1× | 1,259 |
| EA | $52.6B | 59.7× | 36.1× | 7.0× | 0.9% | 79.0% | 11.8% | 13.1% | 13.1% | — | 998 |
| LYV | $39.6B | — | 25.1× | 1.6× | 8.8% | — | 2.0% | 183% | 5.9% | 5.0× | 779 |
| TTWO | $39.3B | — | 426.8× | 5.9× | 18.2% | 57.2% | -4.5% | -8.5% | -4.9% | 26.7× | 1,011 |
| TWLO | $36.4B | 1137.5× | 103.9× | 7.2× | 13.7% | 48.9% | 0.7% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 2.8× | 776 |
| RDDT | $29.4B | 60.1× | 62.1× | 13.3× | 69.4% | 91.2% | 24.1% | 18.1% | 18.1% | — | 765 |
| FOX | $26.9B | 11.9× | — | 1.6× | 16.6% | — | 14.1% | 19.2% | 12.4% | — | 505 |
| OMC | $24.6B | — | 57.5× | 1.4× | 10.1% | 8.5% | -0.3% | -0.5% | -0.3% | 15.8× | 1,083 |
| ROKU | $22.9B | 262.9× | 534.0× | 4.8× | 15.2% | 43.8% | 1.9% | 3.3% | 3.3% | — | 665 |
| FWONA | $21.5B | — | 39.5× | 4.8× | 22.7% | — | 12.4% | 7.2% | 4.3% | 7.9× | 283 |
| NWS | $18.9B | 16.1× | — | 2.2× | 2.4% | — | 14.0% | 13.4% | 11.0% | — | 304 |
| CHTR | $18.0B | 3.7× | 5.3× | 0.3× | -0.6% | — | 9.1% | 31.1% | 4.5% | 4.5× | 760 |
| TKO | $15.6B | 85.2× | 14.0× | 3.3× | -3.1% | — | 4.1% | 5.2% | 2.6% | 2.9× | 616 |
| OOMA | $612M | 97.2× | — | 2.2× | 6.5% | 61.1% | 2.4% | 7.0% | 4.3% | — | 150 |
Peers = companies sharing OOMA's sector (Communication Services) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.