Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 354 of 5,944 reporting institutions (95th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $200.35 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 19.9%/yr for a decade (off $76M normalized FCF).
The market's 19.9% is more optimistic than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.02B shares · net debt $365M
mean -12.2% · volatility σ 102% · implied rate exceeded in 2/8 yrs
Central path = implied 19.9%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (102%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash conversion lags reported earnings — watch accruals. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $80M buybacks = $80M returned on $74M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A balanced mix of reinvestment and shareholder returns.
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 11%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $106M covers the $8M due within a year 13.1× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-06-30 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Coverage is adequate but not comfortable. Effective rate ~8.4% on $259M of debt. Interest last disclosed in FY2019 (no longer broken out).
Cash of $106M fully covers short-term debt of $8M.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.71B 100.0% | $1.54B 100.0% | $1.28B 100.0% | $1.18B 100.0% | $1.15B 100.0% | $1.17B 100.0% | $1.18B 100.0% | $1.09B 100.0% | $961.0M 100.0% | $829.7M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $1.13B 65.7% | $1.01B 65.5% | $847.9M 66.3% | $758.8M 64.1% | $727.0M 63.4% | $745.4M 63.9% | $751.5M 63.6% | $697.6M 64.0% | $637.5M 66.3% | $552.8M 66.6% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $504.5M 46.3% | $466.3M 48.5% | $407.9M 49.2% |
| Cost of Services | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $193.2M 17.7% | $171.2M 17.8% | $144.9M 17.5% |
| Gross Profit | $587.2M 34.3% | $530.5M 34.5% | $430.5M 33.7% | $424.4M 35.9% | $419.9M 36.6% | $420.6M 36.1% | $430.6M 36.4% | $391.7M 36.0% | $323.5M 33.7% | $276.9M 33.4% |
| Research & Development | $73.4M 4.3% | $65.3M 4.2% | $59.4M 4.6% | $59.6M 5.0% | $53.7M 4.7% | $57.3M 4.9% | $56.5M 4.8% | $61.2M 5.6% | $51.0M 5.3% | $49.8M 6.0% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $290.9M 17.0% | $269.7M 17.5% | $228.3M 17.9% | $235.6M 19.9% | $240.7M 21.0% | $252.0M 21.6% | $262.5M 22.2% | $239.6M 22.0% | $192.6M 20.0% | $166.7M 20.1% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $369.7M 21.6% | $341.4M 22.2% | $295.2M 23.1% | $302.7M 25.6% | $304.5M 26.6% | $315.8M 27.1% | $322.8M 27.3% | $335.7M 30.8% | $290.2M 30.2% | $238.5M 28.7% |
| Operating Income | $217.5M 12.7% | $189.1M 12.3% | $135.3M 10.6% | $121.7M 10.3% | $115.4M 10.1% | $104.9M 9.0% | $107.8M 9.1% | $55.9M 5.1% | $33.3M 3.5% | $38.4M 4.6% |
| Interest Expense | — | — | — | — | — | — | $21.6M 1.8% | $19.3M 1.8% | $9.6M 1.0% | $2.9M 0.3% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | — | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% | $27.4M 2.3% | — | — | -$7K -0.0% | $239K 0.0% | $2.1M 0.2% | -$27K -0.0% |
| Pretax Income | $186.1M 10.9% | $161.2M 10.5% | $115.2M 9.0% | $140.2M 11.8% | $98.6M 8.6% | $86.1M 7.4% | $86.2M 7.3% | $36.9M 3.4% | $25.8M 2.7% | $35.5M 4.3% |
| Income Tax Expense | $36.5M 2.1% | $33.1M 2.1% | $23.5M 1.8% | $24.8M 2.1% | $24.6M 2.1% | $10.9M 0.9% | $21.4M 1.8% | $66.0M 6.1% | $4.7M 0.5% | $9.3M 1.1% |
| Net Income | $149.6M 8.7% | $128.2M 8.3% | $91.8M 7.2% | $115.3M 9.7% | $74.0M 6.5% | $75.3M 6.5% | $64.8M 5.5% | -$29.1M -2.7% | $21.1M 2.2% | $26.2M 3.2% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $8.93 | $7.55 | $5.45 | $6.57 | $4.12 | $4.14 | $3.58 | $-1.57 | $1.12 | $1.35 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $8.71 | $7.38 | $5.34 | $6.45 | $4.03 | $4.05 | $3.46 | $-1.57 | $1.07 | $1.30 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 16.8M | 17.0M | 16.8M | 17.6M | 18.0M | 18.2M | 18.1M | 18.6M | 18.9M | 19.4M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 17.2M | 17.4M | 17.2M | 17.9M | 18.4M | 18.6M | 18.7M | 18.6M | 19.7M | 20.1M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
No standout strengths flagged.
Nothing notable to watch.
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 76th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 1.3× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 64.0 | 63.6 | 63.9 | 63.4 | 64.1 | 66.3 | 65.5 | 65.7 |
| Gross Profit | 36.0 | 36.4 | 36.1 | 36.6 | 35.9 | 33.7 | 34.5 | 34.3 |
| R&D | 5.6 | 4.8 | 4.9 | 4.7 | 5.0 | 4.6 | 4.2 | 4.3 |
| SG&A | 22.0 | 22.2 | 21.6 | 21.0 | 19.9 | 17.9 | 17.5 | 17.0 |
| Operating Income | 5.1 | 9.1 | 9.0 | 10.1 | 10.3 | 10.6 | 12.3 | 12.7 |
| Income Tax | 6.1 | 1.8 | 0.9 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Net Income | -2.7 | 5.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 9.7 | 7.2 | 8.3 | 8.7 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on OSIS: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Ranked against 743 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSM | $11.16T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,121 |
| NVDA | $5.33T | 44.8× | 40.0× | 24.7× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.98T | 45.2× | 34.8× | 12.0× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 68.1% | 0.6× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.70T | 27.7× | 19.6× | 11.1× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 27.7% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.65T | 72.8× | 65.1× | 25.8× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.10T | 128.8× | 60.7× | 29.3× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $888.5B | 205.7× | 210.2× | 25.6× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| INTC | $543.3B | — | 67.4× | 10.3× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $436.6B | 43.2× | 36.6× | 7.7× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| PLTR | $421.4B | 279.8× | 291.6× | 94.2× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| DELL | $383.6B | 67.8× | 36.1× | 3.4× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| LRCX | $341.7B | 64.9× | 54.5× | 18.5× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 37.4% | 0.7× | 2,500 |
| RPAY | $338.0B | — | — | 1092.8× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -28.2% | -1.7× | 142 |
| AMAT | $331.0B | 48.2× | 38.1× | 11.7× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| UMC | $307.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| ARM | $281.9B | 311.6× | 242.9× | 57.3× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| SAP | $262.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 794 |
| ANET | $250.7B | 72.6× | 63.3× | 27.8× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 39.0% | 28.4% | 28.4% | — | 1,930 |
| PANW | $250.5B | 234.4× | 156.5× | 27.2× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| SNDK | $235.7B | — | — | 32.0× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.8% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| TXN | $234.6B | 47.4× | 30.9× | 13.3× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.5% | 1.8× | 2,345 |
| CRM | $225.6B | 31.1× | 24.4× | 5.4× | 9.6% | 77.7% | 18.0% | 12.6% | 10.1% | 1.5× | 2,547 |
| IBM | $222.8B | 21.3× | — | 3.3× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| MRVL | $204.0B | 78.4× | 133.3× | 24.9× | 42.1% | 51.0% | 32.6% | 18.7% | 14.2% | 2.9× | 1,477 |
| QCOM | $202.7B | 37.7× | 15.2× | 4.6× | 13.7% | 55.4% | 12.5% | 26.1% | 15.4% | 1.1× | 2,611 |
| OSIS | $3.4B | 23.0× | 14.3× | 2.0× | 11.3% | 34.3% | 8.7% | 15.7% | 10.5% | 1.8× | 354 |
Peers = companies sharing OSIS's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.