Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 273 of 5,944 reporting institutions (94th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 5 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $23.52 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 4.4%/yr for a decade (off $717M normalized FCF).
The market's 4.4% is in line with its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.25B shares · net debt $5.2B
mean 8.1% · volatility σ 30% · implied rate exceeded in 5/9 yrs
Central path = implied 4.4%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (30%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 40% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $272M dividends + $413M buybacks = $685M returned on $687M FCF.
9 consecutive years of dividend increases · 11%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Modest payoff on reinvested capital. Current ROIC on all capital: 4%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.”
Cash of $1.2B fully covers short-term debt of $36M.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.17B 100.0% | $5.77B 100.0% | $4.48B 100.0% | $3.49B 100.0% | $3.39B 100.0% | $3.11B 100.0% | $2.87B 100.0% | $2.82B 100.0% | $2.29B 100.0% | $1.82B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $1.43B 27.7% | $1.58B 27.4% | $1.32B 29.4% | $1.06B 30.4% | $1.03B 30.6% | $1.00B 32.3% | $930.7M 32.4% | $951.4M 33.8% | $762.4M 33.3% | $574.0M 31.5% |
| Gross Profit | $3.73B 72.3% | $4.19B 72.6% | $3.17B 70.6% | $2.43B 69.6% | $2.35B 69.4% | $2.11B 67.7% | $1.94B 67.6% | $1.86B 66.2% | $1.53B 66.8% | $1.25B 68.5% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $427.8M 8.3% | $577.0M 10.0% | $419.6M 9.4% | $317.1M 9.1% | $263.5M 7.8% | $237.5M 7.6% | $207.9M 7.2% | $205.2M 7.3% | $170.4M 7.4% | $140.4M 7.7% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $2.84B 55.0% | $3.30B 57.3% | $2.65B 59.1% | $1.79B 51.1% | $1.61B 47.6% | $1.60B 51.5% | $1.37B 47.8% | $1.36B 48.2% | $1.17B 51.3% | $881.7M 48.3% |
| Operating Income | $892.7M 17.3% | $887.1M 15.4% | $516.3M 11.5% | $644.8M 18.5% | $740.9M 21.9% | $503.5M 16.2% | $567.0M 19.8% | $506.7M 18.0% | $354.7M 15.5% | $368.6M 20.2% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$82.8M -1.6% | $358.4M 6.2% | $34.5M 0.8% | $29.1M 0.8% | $61.4M 1.8% | -$11.9M -0.4% | $10.2M 0.4% | $18.0M 0.6% | $15.7M 0.7% | -$1.4M -0.1% |
| Pretax Income | $482.1M 9.3% | $729.3M 12.6% | $221.3M 4.9% | $516.0M 14.8% | $650.8M 19.2% | $345.2M 11.1% | $440.6M 15.4% | $386.1M 13.7% | $249.6M 10.9% | $290.8M 15.9% |
| Income Tax Expense | $46.0M 0.9% | $264.0M 4.6% | $70.8M 1.6% | $118.8M 3.4% | $339.9M 10.0% | $110.8M 3.6% | $154.9M 5.4% | $143.8M 5.1% | -$776.4M -33.9% | $6.3M 0.3% |
| Net Income | $435.9M 8.4% | $465.1M 8.1% | $150.4M 3.4% | $397.1M 11.4% | $310.7M 9.2% | $234.2M 7.5% | $285.5M 10.0% | $242.2M 8.6% | $1.03B 44.8% | $284.5M 15.6% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $1.66 | $1.71 | $0.56 | $1.46 | $1.14 | $0.86 | $1.06 | $0.91 | $4.04 | $1.17 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $1.65 | $1.71 | $0.56 | $1.46 | $1.14 | $0.86 | $1.06 | $0.91 | $4.01 | $1.17 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 263.3M | 271.5M | 270.3M | 271.3M | 272.5M | 270.8M | 268.8M | 266.1M | 253.9M | 242.9M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 263.6M | 272.6M | 270.5M | 271.9M | 273.5M | 271.8M | 269.9M | 267.5M | 255.8M | 244.1M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 26th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 33.8 | 32.4 | 32.3 | 30.6 | 30.4 | 29.4 | 27.4 | 27.7 |
| Gross Profit | 66.2 | 67.6 | 67.7 | 69.4 | 69.6 | 70.6 | 72.6 | 72.3 |
| SG&A | 7.3 | 7.2 | 7.6 | 7.8 | 9.1 | 9.4 | 10.0 | 8.3 |
| Operating Income | 18.0 | 19.8 | 16.2 | 21.9 | 18.5 | 11.5 | 15.4 | 17.3 |
| Income Tax | 5.1 | 5.4 | 3.6 | 10.0 | 3.4 | 1.6 | 4.6 | 0.9 |
| Net Income | 8.6 | 10.0 | 7.5 | 9.2 | 11.4 | 3.4 | 8.1 | 8.4 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on OTEX: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 743 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSM | $11.16T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,121 |
| NVDA | $5.33T | 44.8× | 40.0× | 24.7× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.98T | 45.2× | 34.8× | 12.0× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 68.1% | 0.6× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.70T | 27.7× | 19.6× | 11.1× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 27.7% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.65T | 72.8× | 65.1× | 25.8× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.10T | 128.8× | 60.7× | 29.3× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $888.5B | 205.7× | 210.2× | 25.6× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| INTC | $543.3B | — | 67.4× | 10.3× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $436.6B | 43.2× | 36.6× | 7.7× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| PLTR | $421.4B | 279.8× | 291.6× | 94.2× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| DELL | $383.6B | 67.8× | 36.1× | 3.4× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| LRCX | $341.7B | 64.9× | 54.5× | 18.5× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 37.4% | 0.7× | 2,500 |
| RPAY | $338.0B | — | — | 1092.8× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -28.2% | -1.7× | 142 |
| AMAT | $331.0B | 48.2× | 38.1× | 11.7× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| UMC | $307.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| ARM | $281.9B | 311.6× | 242.9× | 57.3× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| SAP | $262.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 794 |
| ANET | $250.7B | 72.6× | 63.3× | 27.8× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 39.0% | 28.4% | 28.4% | — | 1,930 |
| PANW | $250.5B | 234.4× | 156.5× | 27.2× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| SNDK | $235.7B | — | — | 32.0× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.8% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| TXN | $234.6B | 47.4× | 30.9× | 13.3× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.5% | 1.8× | 2,345 |
| CRM | $225.6B | 31.1× | 24.4× | 5.4× | 9.6% | 77.7% | 18.0% | 12.6% | 10.1% | 1.5× | 2,547 |
| IBM | $222.8B | 21.3× | — | 3.3× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| MRVL | $204.0B | 78.4× | 133.3× | 24.9× | 42.1% | 51.0% | 32.6% | 18.7% | 14.2% | 2.9× | 1,477 |
| QCOM | $202.7B | 37.7× | 15.2× | 4.6× | 13.7% | 55.4% | 12.5% | 26.1% | 15.4% | 1.1× | 2,611 |
| OTEX | $6.0B | 14.3× | — | 1.2× | -10.4% | 72.3% | 8.4% | 11.1% | 4.2% | — | 273 |
Peers = companies sharing OTEX's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.