Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 235 of 5,944 reporting institutions (93th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $14.44 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 3.0%/yr for a decade (off $99M normalized FCF).
The market's 3.0% is more conservative than its 5-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.08B shares · net debt $183M
mean 67.8% · volatility σ 299% · implied rate exceeded in 2/4 yrs
Central path = implied 3.0%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (299%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2026
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $492.5M 100.0% | $467.5M 100.0% | $430.7M 100.0% | $370.8M 100.0% | $281.4M 100.0% | $213.6M 100.0% | $166.4M 100.0% | $117.8M 100.0% | $79.6M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $74.1M 15.1% | $79.7M 17.0% | $77.8M 18.1% | $70.4M 19.0% | $48.4M 17.2% | $30.7M 14.4% | $24.6M 14.8% | $17.3M 14.6% | $12.7M 16.0% |
| Gross Profit | $418.4M 84.9% | $387.8M 83.0% | $352.9M 81.9% | $300.4M 81.0% | $233.0M 82.8% | $182.9M 85.6% | $141.8M 85.2% | $100.6M 85.4% | $66.9M 84.0% |
| Research & Development | $126.9M 25.8% | $141.5M 30.3% | $139.8M 32.5% | $134.9M 36.4% | $95.7M 34.0% | $64.6M 30.2% | $49.0M 29.5% | $38.9M 33.0% | $33.5M 42.1% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $101.6M 20.6% | $104.3M 22.3% | $112.6M 26.1% | $99.2M 26.8% | $77.4M 27.5% | $62.4M 29.2% | $51.0M 30.6% | $40.0M 33.9% | $24.3M 30.6% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $412.6M 83.8% | $447.6M 95.7% | $449.1M 104.3% | $429.7M 115.9% | $334.7M 119.0% | $249.2M 116.7% | $197.3M 118.6% | $142.9M 121.3% | $105.2M 132.1% |
| Operating Income | $5.8M 1.2% | -$59.8M -12.8% | -$96.2M -22.3% | -$129.4M -34.9% | -$101.7M -36.1% | -$66.3M -31.0% | -$55.6M -33.4% | -$42.3M -35.9% | -$38.3M -48.1% |
| Interest Expense | $8.9M 1.8% | $9.3M 2.0% | $6.5M 1.5% | $5.4M 1.5% | $5.4M 1.9% | $10.0M 4.7% | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% | $702K 0.9% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $22.7M 4.6% | $27.5M 5.9% | $22.1M 5.1% | $5.4M 1.5% | $762K 0.3% | $4.2M 2.0% | $5.7M 3.4% | $1.2M 1.1% | $371K 0.5% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $489K 0.1% | -$215K -0.0% | -$433K -0.1% | -$637K -0.2% | -$573K -0.2% | -$794K -0.4% | $203K 0.1% | $1.0M 0.9% | $682K 0.9% |
| Pretax Income | $20.2M 4.1% | -$41.8M -8.9% | -$77.4M -18.0% | -$130.1M -35.1% | -$106.9M -38.0% | -$72.8M -34.1% | -$49.7M -29.9% | -$40.0M -34.0% | -$38.0M -47.7% |
| Income Tax Expense | -$152.5M -31.0% | $1.8M 0.4% | -$12K -0.0% | -$839K -0.2% | $535K 0.2% | -$3.9M -1.8% | $675K 0.4% | $701K 0.6% | $184K 0.2% |
| Net Income | $172.7M 35.1% | -$43.5M -9.3% | -$77.4M -18.0% | -$129.2M -34.9% | -$107.5M -38.2% | -$68.9M -32.3% | -$50.3M -30.3% | -$40.7M -34.6% | -$38.1M -47.9% |
| Per Share | |||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $1.91 | $-0.59 | $-0.89 | $-1.45 | $-1.27 | $-0.87 | $-0.77 | — | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | $1.87 | $-0.59 | $-0.89 | $-1.45 | $-1.27 | $-0.87 | $-0.77 | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 91.2M | 92.0M | 92.3M | 88.7M | 84.5M | 79.6M | 65.5M | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 93.0M | 92.0M | 92.3M | 88.7M | 84.5M | 79.6M | 65.5M | — | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash conversion lags reported earnings — watch accruals. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $135M buybacks = $135M returned on $112M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 9 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 26%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 9 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $237M covers the $6M due within a year 39.3× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2026-01-31 (10-K).
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~2.1% on $421M of debt.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Nothing notable to watch.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2026 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 14.6 | 14.8 | 14.4 | 17.2 | 19.0 | 18.1 | 17.0 | 15.1 |
| Gross Profit | 85.4 | 85.2 | 85.6 | 82.8 | 81.0 | 81.9 | 83.0 | 84.9 |
| R&D | 33.0 | 29.5 | 30.2 | 34.0 | 36.4 | 32.5 | 30.3 | 25.8 |
| SG&A | 33.9 | 30.6 | 29.2 | 27.5 | 26.8 | 26.1 | 22.3 | 20.6 |
| Operating Income | -35.9 | -33.4 | -31.0 | -36.1 | -34.9 | -22.3 | -12.8 | 1.2 |
| Income Tax | 0.6 | 0.4 | -1.8 | 0.2 | -0.2 | -0.0 | 0.4 | -31.0 |
| Net Income | -34.6 | -30.3 | -32.3 | -38.2 | -34.9 | -18.0 | -9.3 | 35.1 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on PD: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 743 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSM | $10.83T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,121 |
| NVDA | $5.20T | 43.6× | 39.0× | 24.1× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.91T | 44.6× | 34.3× | 11.8× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 68.1% | 0.6× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.64T | 27.3× | 19.3× | 11.0× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 27.7% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.61T | 71.2× | 63.6× | 25.2× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.04T | 122.1× | 57.5× | 27.8× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $835.4B | 193.4× | 197.6× | 24.1× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| INTC | $504.6B | — | 62.9× | 9.6× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $426.7B | 42.3× | 35.8× | 7.5× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| PLTR | $416.9B | 276.7× | 288.5× | 93.2× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| DELL | $367.3B | 64.9× | 34.6× | 3.2× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| LRCX | $341.6B | 64.9× | 54.5× | 18.5× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 37.4% | 0.7× | 2,500 |
| AMAT | $329.4B | 48.0× | 37.9× | 11.6× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| RPAY | $325.1B | — | — | 1051.3× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -28.2% | -1.7× | 142 |
| UMC | $283.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| SAP | $261.9B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 794 |
| ARM | $259.6B | 287.0× | 223.6× | 52.8× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| PANW | $250.9B | 234.8× | 156.8× | 27.2× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| ANET | $248.2B | 71.8× | 62.7× | 27.6× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 39.0% | 28.4% | 28.4% | — | 1,930 |
| TXN | $236.9B | 47.8× | 31.2× | 13.4× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.5% | 1.8× | 2,345 |
| CRM | $232.8B | 32.1× | 25.2× | 5.6× | 9.6% | 77.7% | 18.0% | 12.6% | 10.1% | 1.5× | 2,547 |
| IBM | $222.5B | 21.3× | — | 3.3× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| SNDK | $221.9B | — | — | 30.2× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.8% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| QCOM | $198.5B | 36.9× | 14.9× | 4.5× | 13.7% | 55.4% | 12.5% | 26.1% | 15.4% | 1.1× | 2,611 |
| MRVL | $194.6B | 74.8× | 127.2× | 23.8× | 42.1% | 51.0% | 32.6% | 18.7% | 14.2% | 2.9× | 1,477 |
| PD | $1.2B | 7.7× | 74.3× | 2.5× | 5.4% | 84.9% | 35.2% | 68.4% | 25.7% | 22.2× | 235 |
Peers = companies sharing PD's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.