Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 425 of 5,944 reporting institutions (96th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $55.70 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 1.4%/yr for a decade (off $359M normalized FCF).
The market's 1.4% is more conservative than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.06B shares · net debt $1.4B
mean 1147.4% · volatility σ 2813% · implied rate exceeded in 6/9 yrs
Central path = implied 1.4%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (2813%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 27% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $150M dividends + $2M buybacks = $153M returned on $558M FCF.
2 consecutive years of dividend increases · 2%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A balanced mix of reinvestment and shareholder returns.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -20%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~8.7% on $1.5B of debt.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.15B 100.0% | $7.18B 100.0% | $8.93B 100.0% | $8.59B 100.0% | $7.44B 100.0% | $6.28B 100.0% | $6.78B 100.0% | $6.08B 100.0% | $5.43B 100.0% | $4.52B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $5.78B 80.9% | $5.71B 79.6% | $6.97B 78.1% | $6.63B 77.2% | $5.69B 76.5% | $4.75B 75.6% | $5.13B 75.7% | $4.58B 75.3% | $4.10B 75.6% | $3.41B 75.5% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $4.10B 75.6% | $3.41B 75.5% |
| Gross Profit | $1.37B 19.1% | $1.47B 20.4% | $1.96B 21.9% | $1.96B 22.8% | $1.75B 23.5% | $1.54B 24.4% | $1.65B 24.3% | $1.50B 24.7% | $1.32B 24.4% | $1.11B 24.5% |
| Research & Development | $371.9M 5.2% | $336.9M 4.7% | $374.3M 4.2% | $366.7M 4.3% | $328.7M 4.4% | $288.1M 4.6% | $292.9M 4.3% | $259.7M 4.3% | $238.3M 4.4% | $185.1M 4.1% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $541.8M 7.6% | $436.5M 6.1% | $422.8M 4.7% | $355.9M 4.1% | $305.8M 4.1% | $296.1M 4.7% | $393.9M 5.8% | $349.7M 5.8% | $331.2M 6.1% | $306.4M 6.8% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $1.80B 25.2% | $1.27B 17.8% | $1.34B 15.0% | $1.20B 14.0% | $1.09B 14.7% | $1.10B 17.4% | $1.25B 18.4% | $1.10B 18.1% | $1.04B 19.2% | $833.8M 18.5% |
| Operating Income | -$348.7M -4.9% | $290.6M 4.0% | $700.9M 7.8% | $804.5M 9.4% | $712.0M 9.6% | $521.0M 8.3% | $483.7M 7.1% | $487.4M 8.0% | $359.7M 6.6% | $350.3M 7.8% |
| Interest Expense | $131.4M 1.8% | $137.0M 1.9% | $125.0M 1.4% | $71.7M 0.8% | $44.2M 0.6% | $66.8M 1.1% | $77.6M 1.1% | $57.0M 0.9% | $32.2M 0.6% | $16.3M 0.4% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$52.6M -0.7% | -$12.8M -0.2% | $44.5M 0.5% | $28.6M 0.3% | -$2.3M -0.0% | -$3.8M -0.1% | $6.8M 0.1% | $28.1M 0.5% | -$2.0M -0.0% | -$13.8M -0.3% |
| Pretax Income | -$532.7M -7.4% | $140.8M 2.0% | $620.4M 6.9% | $761.4M 8.9% | $628.7M 8.5% | $450.4M 7.2% | $407.8M 6.0% | $429.2M 7.1% | $318.8M 5.9% | $313.3M 6.9% |
| Income Tax Expense | -$67.9M -0.9% | $29.6M 0.4% | $117.7M 1.3% | $158.0M 1.8% | $132.1M 1.8% | $89.9M 1.4% | $83.9M 1.2% | $93.9M 1.5% | $146.3M 2.7% | $100.3M 2.2% |
| Net Income | -$465.5M -6.5% | $110.8M 1.5% | $502.8M 5.6% | $447.1M 5.2% | $493.9M 6.6% | $124.8M 2.0% | $324.0M 4.8% | $335.3M 5.5% | $172.5M 3.2% | $212.9M 4.7% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-8.18 | $1.96 | $8.80 | $7.54 | $8.06 | $2.02 | $5.27 | $5.36 | $2.74 | $3.31 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-8.18 | $1.95 | $8.71 | $7.44 | $7.88 | $1.99 | $5.20 | $5.24 | $2.69 | $3.27 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 56.9M | 56.5M | 57.1M | 59.3M | 61.3M | 61.9M | 61.4M | 62.5M | 62.9M | 64.3M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 56.9M | 56.8M | 57.7M | 60.1M | 62.7M | 62.6M | 62.3M | 63.9M | 64.2M | 65.2M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
No standout strengths flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 10th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Operating leverage needs meaningful revenue change.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 75.3 | 75.7 | 75.6 | 76.5 | 77.2 | 78.1 | 79.6 | 80.9 |
| Gross Profit | 24.7 | 24.3 | 24.4 | 23.5 | 22.8 | 21.9 | 20.4 | 19.1 |
| R&D | 4.3 | 4.3 | 4.6 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 4.7 | 5.2 |
| SG&A | 5.8 | 5.8 | 4.7 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.7 | 6.1 | 7.6 |
| Operating Income | 8.0 | 7.1 | 8.3 | 9.6 | 9.4 | 7.8 | 4.0 | -4.9 |
| Income Tax | 1.5 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.3 | 0.4 | -0.9 |
| Net Income | 5.5 | 4.8 | 2.0 | 6.6 | 5.2 | 5.6 | 1.5 | -6.5 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on PII: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Ranked against 490 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN | $2.70T | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.5% | 16.2% | — | 5,764 |
| TSLA | $1.37T | 339.1× | 145.5× | 14.5× | -2.9% | 18.0% | 4.0% | 4.6% | 4.2% | 0.9× | 4,029 |
| TM | $614.2B | 60.0× | 24.8× | 2.6× | 3.8% | 18.4% | 4.4% | 7.9% | 5.9% | 1.7× | 665 |
| PDD | $442.6B | 32.9× | 31.9× | 7.2× | 14.5% | 56.3% | 22.7% | 23.7% | 23.7% | — | 548 |
| HD | $301.3B | 21.3× | 14.3× | 1.8× | 3.2% | 33.3% | 8.6% | 110% | 22.8% | 2.0× | 3,970 |
| BABA | $201.7B | 135.7× | — | 1.4× | 8.1% | 39.8% | 10.1% | 9.8% | 9.8% | — | 1,298 |
| TJX | $140.1B | 26.0× | — | 2.3× | 7.1% | 31.0% | 9.1% | 53.9% | 42.1% | — | 2,608 |
| HTHT | $132.7B | 187.9× | 114.3× | — | — | — | — | 39.7% | 27.3% | 0.7× | 258 |
| SBUX | $109.9B | 59.3× | 26.8× | 3.0× | 2.8% | — | 5.0% | -22.9% | 23.3% | 3.4× | 2,252 |
| LOW | $108.9B | 16.4× | 12.0× | 1.3× | 3.1% | 33.5% | 7.7% | -67.1% | 22.3% | 3.2× | 2,591 |
| ABNB | $101.7B | — | 37.9× | 8.3× | 10.3% | 83.0% | 20.5% | 30.6% | 24.6% | 0.8× | 1,246 |
| MELI | $92.5B | 46.3× | — | 3.2× | 39.1% | 44.5% | 6.9% | 29.6% | 12.5% | — | 1,380 |
| MAR | $88.8B | 35.1× | 20.6× | 3.4× | 4.3% | — | 9.9% | -69.0% | -69.4% | 0.0× | 1,559 |
| LKNCY | $86.3B | 168.2× | 90.8× | 12.3× | 48.9% | — | 7.3% | 23.0% | 23.0% | — | 9 |
| GM | $78.3B | 26.5× | 3.9× | 0.4× | -1.3% | — | 1.5% | 4.4% | 4.4% | — | 1,447 |
| ROST | $74.0B | 34.7× | 22.0× | 3.3× | 7.7% | 27.7% | 9.4% | 34.7% | 27.8% | 0.5× | 1,276 |
| ORLY | $71.5B | 28.6× | 19.5× | 4.0× | 6.4% | 51.6% | 14.3% | -333% | 48.3% | 1.5× | 1,569 |
| HLT | $69.7B | 49.4× | 24.0× | 5.8× | 7.7% | — | 12.1% | -27.0% | -27.0% | — | 1,126 |
| RCL | $67.7B | 16.0× | — | 3.8× | 8.8% | 49.4% | 23.8% | 42.5% | 32.3% | — | 1,114 |
| SE | $62.0B | 40.2× | 24.6× | 2.7× | 36.4% | 44.7% | 6.9% | 12.6% | 12.6% | — | 718 |
| F | $54.2B | — | 4.5× | 0.3× | 1.2% | 6.8% | -4.4% | -22.7% | -22.7% | — | — |
| NKE | $53.9B | 17.3× | — | 1.2× | 0.2% | 42.9% | 6.7% | 20.9% | 13.6% | — | 1,848 |
| EBAY | $50.7B | 26.0× | 18.4× | 4.6× | 7.9% | 71.5% | 18.3% | 45.3% | 38.8% | 0.3× | 1,182 |
| AZO | $47.8B | 19.6× | 13.3× | 2.5× | 2.4% | 52.6% | 13.2% | -73.2% | 46.4% | 2.1× | 1,245 |
| CMG | $44.8B | 29.4× | 19.4× | 3.8× | 5.4% | — | 12.9% | 54.3% | 54.3% | 0.0× | 1,203 |
| PII | $3.1B | — | — | 0.4× | -0.3% | 19.1% | -6.5% | -56.2% | -19.9% | -24.3× | 425 |
Peers = companies sharing PII's sector (Consumer Cyclical) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.