Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 213 of 5,944 reporting institutions (92th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $39.86 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 14.1%/yr for a decade (off $33M normalized FCF).
The market's 14.1% is more optimistic than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.02B shares · net debt $149M
mean 121.4% · volatility σ 383% · implied rate exceeded in 4/9 yrs
Central path = implied 14.1%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (383%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 44% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $28M dividends + $6M buybacks = $34M returned on $64M FCF.
1 consecutive years of dividend increases · 121%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A balanced mix of reinvestment and shareholder returns.
Modest payoff on reinvested capital. Current ROIC on all capital: 11%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $656.1M 100.0% | $568.5M 100.0% | $568.2M 100.0% | $616.1M 100.0% | $541.5M 100.0% | $480.2M 100.0% | $571.7M 100.0% | $524.1M 100.0% | $474.9M 100.0% | $416.3M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $481.4M 73.4% | $421.7M 74.2% | $433.9M 76.4% | $464.6M 75.4% | $399.6M 73.8% | $351.9M 73.3% | $402.9M 70.5% | $369.2M 70.4% | $331.8M 69.9% | $282.3M 67.8% |
| Gross Profit | $174.7M 26.6% | $146.8M 25.8% | $134.3M 23.6% | $151.5M 24.6% | $141.9M 26.2% | $128.3M 26.7% | $168.8M 29.5% | $154.9M 29.6% | $143.1M 30.1% | $134.0M 32.2% |
| Research & Development | $7.7M 1.2% | $8.4M 1.5% | $10.1M 1.8% | $12.2M 2.0% | $10.2M 1.9% | $6.7M 1.4% | $5.7M 1.0% | $3.2M 0.6% | $2.9M 0.6% | $3.1M 0.8% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $94.9M 14.5% | $91.7M 16.1% | $78.8M 13.9% | $82.2M 13.3% | $78.8M 14.6% | $64.6M 13.5% | $71.3M 12.5% | $70.0M 13.3% | $60.9M 12.8% | $53.6M 12.9% |
| Operating Income | $73.6M 11.2% | $88.7M 15.6% | $44.9M 7.9% | $58.8M 9.5% | $51.1M 9.4% | -$75.1M -15.6% | $86.6M 15.1% | $73.5M 14.0% | $70.8M 14.9% | $69.8M 16.8% |
| Interest Expense | $0 0.0% | $198K 0.0% | $476K 0.1% | $476K 0.1% | $1.8M 0.3% | $611K 0.1% | — | — | — | — |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $344K 0.1% | $442K 0.1% | $0 0.0% | -$139K -0.0% | $228K 0.0% | $91K 0.0% | -$565K -0.1% | -$758K -0.1% | -$832K -0.2% | -$967K -0.2% |
| Pretax Income | $61.5M 9.4% | $73.9M 13.0% | $29.2M 5.1% | $47.4M 7.7% | $34.6M 6.4% | -$98.8M -20.6% | $62.6M 11.0% | $55.8M 10.6% | $52.9M 11.1% | $63.7M 15.3% |
| Income Tax Expense | $14.6M 2.2% | $17.7M 3.1% | $5.5M 1.0% | $8.8M 1.4% | $3.9M 0.7% | -$12.3M -2.6% | $13.5M 2.4% | $11.9M 2.3% | -$2.4M -0.5% | $24.7M 5.9% |
| Net Income | $46.9M 7.1% | $56.2M 9.9% | $23.7M 4.2% | $38.6M 6.3% | $30.7M 5.7% | -$86.6M -18.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $1.99 | $2.39 | $1.01 | $1.65 | $1.31 | $-3.81 | $2.13 | $1.91 | $2.42 | $1.71 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $1.96 | $2.36 | $0.98 | $1.63 | $1.29 | $-3.81 | $2.11 | $1.89 | $2.40 | $1.70 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 23.1M | 23.1M | 23.0M | 22.9M | 23.0M | 22.8M | 22.78B | 22.68B | 22.58B | 22.48B |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 23.6M | 23.5M | 23.0M | 22.9M | 23.0M | 22.8M | 22.81B | 22.70B | 22.59B | 22.48B |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
$7M of principal comes due within a year. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-12-31 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit. Effective rate ~0.1% on $148M of debt. Interest last disclosed in FY2024 (no longer broken out).
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 490 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN | $2.65T | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.5% | 16.2% | — | 5,764 |
| TSLA | $1.34T | 331.6× | 142.2× | 14.2× | -2.9% | 18.0% | 4.0% | 4.6% | 4.2% | 0.9× | 4,029 |
| TM | $608.8B | 59.5× | 24.6× | 2.6× | 3.8% | 18.4% | 4.4% | 7.9% | 5.9% | 1.7× | 665 |
| PDD | $448.4B | 33.4× | 32.3× | 7.3× | 14.5% | 56.3% | 22.7% | 23.7% | 23.7% | — | 548 |
| HD | $301.3B | 21.3× | 14.3× | 1.8× | 3.2% | 33.3% | 8.6% | 110% | 22.8% | 2.0× | 3,970 |
| BABA | $199.3B | 134.1× | — | 1.3× | 8.1% | 39.8% | 10.1% | 9.8% | 9.8% | — | 1,298 |
| TJX | $136.0B | 25.2× | — | 2.3× | 7.1% | 31.0% | 9.1% | 53.9% | 42.1% | — | 2,608 |
| HTHT | $131.2B | 185.7× | 113.0× | — | — | — | — | 39.7% | 27.3% | 0.7× | 258 |
| SBUX | $110.7B | 59.7× | 26.9× | 3.0× | 2.8% | — | 5.0% | -22.9% | 23.3% | 3.4× | 2,252 |
| LOW | $108.9B | 16.4× | 12.0× | 1.3× | 3.1% | 33.5% | 7.7% | -67.1% | 22.3% | 3.2× | 2,591 |
| ABNB | $102.7B | — | 38.3× | 8.4× | 10.3% | 83.0% | 20.5% | 30.6% | 24.6% | 0.8× | 1,246 |
| MELI | $93.3B | 46.7× | — | 3.2× | 39.1% | 44.5% | 6.9% | 29.6% | 12.5% | — | 1,380 |
| MAR | $89.1B | 35.2× | 20.7× | 3.4× | 4.3% | — | 9.9% | -69.0% | -69.4% | 0.0× | 1,559 |
| LKNCY | $87.3B | 170.2× | 91.9× | 12.4× | 48.9% | — | 7.3% | 23.0% | 23.0% | — | 9 |
| GM | $76.2B | 25.8× | 3.7× | 0.4× | -1.3% | — | 1.5% | 4.4% | 4.4% | — | 1,447 |
| ROST | $72.5B | 34.0× | 21.6× | 3.2× | 7.7% | 27.7% | 9.4% | 34.7% | 27.8% | 0.5× | 1,276 |
| ORLY | $70.5B | 28.2× | 19.2× | 4.0× | 6.4% | 51.6% | 14.3% | -333% | 48.3% | 1.5× | 1,569 |
| HLT | $70.4B | 49.9× | 24.2× | 5.8× | 7.7% | — | 12.1% | -27.0% | -27.0% | — | 1,126 |
| RCL | $68.8B | 16.3× | — | 3.8× | 8.8% | 49.4% | 23.8% | 42.5% | 32.3% | — | 1,114 |
| SE | $63.4B | 41.1× | 25.1× | 2.8× | 36.4% | 44.7% | 6.9% | 12.6% | 12.6% | — | 718 |
| F | $53.1B | — | 4.4× | 0.3× | 1.2% | 6.8% | -4.4% | -22.7% | -22.7% | — | — |
| NKE | $53.1B | 17.0× | — | 1.1× | 0.2% | 42.9% | 6.7% | 20.9% | 13.6% | — | 1,848 |
| EBAY | $49.0B | 25.1× | 17.8× | 4.4× | 7.9% | 71.5% | 18.3% | 45.3% | 38.8% | 0.3× | 1,182 |
| AZO | $47.8B | 19.7× | 13.3× | 2.5× | 2.4% | 52.6% | 13.2% | -73.2% | 46.4% | 2.1× | 1,245 |
| CMG | $45.0B | 29.5× | 19.4× | 3.8× | 5.4% | — | 12.9% | 54.3% | 54.3% | 0.0× | 1,203 |
| PLOW | $908M | 20.1× | 11.9× | 1.4× | 15.4% | 26.6% | 7.1% | 16.7% | 10.9% | 1.7× | 213 |
Peers = companies sharing PLOW's sector (Consumer Cyclical) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Nothing notable to watch.
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 50th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 70.4 | 70.5 | 73.3 | 73.8 | 75.4 | 76.4 | 74.2 | 73.4 |
| Gross Profit | 29.6 | 29.5 | 26.7 | 26.2 | 24.6 | 23.6 | 25.8 | 26.6 |
| R&D | 0.6 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 1.5 | 1.2 |
| SG&A | 13.3 | 12.5 | 13.5 | 14.6 | 13.3 | 13.9 | 16.1 | 14.5 |
| Operating Income | 14.0 | 15.1 | -15.6 | 9.4 | 9.5 | 7.9 | 15.6 | 11.2 |
| Income Tax | 2.3 | 2.4 | -2.6 | 0.7 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 3.1 | 2.2 |
| Net Income | — | — | -18.0 | 5.7 | 6.3 | 4.2 | 9.9 | 7.1 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on PLOW: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.