Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 281 of 5,944 reporting institutions (94th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $32.18 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 11.8%/yr for a decade (off $191M normalized FCF).
The market's 11.8% is more conservative than its 4-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.15B shares · net debt $343M
mean -78.2% · volatility σ 140% · implied rate exceeded in 1/2 yrs
Central path = implied 11.8%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (140%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $40M buybacks = $40M returned on $209M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 6 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -11%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 6 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $326M covers the $0 due within a year 325927000.0× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-12-31 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~5.8% on $669M of debt.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Where each multiple sits in its own 4-yr range · 100th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 4-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 319.5× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 64.9 | 52.3 | 64.3 | 60.2 | 43.5 | 42.5 |
| Gross Profit | 35.1 | 47.7 | 35.7 | 39.8 | 56.5 | 57.5 |
| SG&A | 15.1 | 11.1 | 16.7 | 14.4 | 11.9 | 11.9 |
| Operating Income | -2.4 | 21.0 | 36.1 | 29.3 | -0.7 | -30.8 |
| Income Tax | -7.4 | 3.1 | 1.5 | -1.8 | -7.3 | -4.6 |
| Net Income | -17.6 | 7.1 | 25.5 | 21.0 | -1.1 | -31.6 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on PRM: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2020 | FY2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $652.9M 100.0% | $561.0M 100.0% | $322.1M 100.0% | $360.5M 100.0% | $339.6M 100.0% | $239.3M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $277.7M 42.5% | $243.9M 43.5% | $193.8M 60.2% | $231.9M 64.3% | $177.5M 52.3% | $155.4M 64.9% |
| Gross Profit | $375.1M 57.5% | $317.1M 56.5% | $128.3M 39.8% | $128.7M 35.7% | $162.0M 47.7% | $83.9M 35.1% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $77.6M 11.9% | $66.9M 11.9% | $46.5M 14.4% | $60.3M 16.7% | $37.7M 11.1% | $36.2M 15.1% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $576.1M 88.2% | $320.9M 57.2% | $33.8M 10.5% | -$1.4M -0.4% | $90.6M 26.7% | $89.7M 37.5% |
| Operating Income | -$200.9M -30.8% | -$3.8M -0.7% | $94.5M 29.3% | $130.1M 36.1% | $71.5M 21.0% | -$5.8M -2.4% |
| Interest Expense | $39.1M 6.0% | $40.5M 7.2% | $41.4M 12.8% | $42.6M 11.8% | $42.0M 12.4% | $51.7M 21.6% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$35.3M -5.4% | -$43.1M -7.7% | -$32.9M -10.2% | -$32.8M -9.1% | -$36.7M -10.8% | -$53.9M -22.5% |
| Pretax Income | -$236.2M -36.2% | -$46.9M -8.4% | $61.6M 19.1% | $97.2M 27.0% | $34.7M 10.2% | -$59.7M -25.0% |
| Income Tax Expense | -$29.9M -4.6% | -$41.0M -7.3% | -$5.9M -1.8% | $5.5M 1.5% | $10.5M 3.1% | -$17.7M -7.4% |
| Net Income | -$206.4M -31.6% | -$5.9M -1.1% | $67.5M 21.0% | $91.8M 25.5% | $24.2M 7.1% | -$42.0M -17.6% |
| Per Share | ||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-1.37 | $-0.04 | $0.44 | $0.57 | $0.46 | $-0.79 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-1.37 | $-0.04 | $0.41 | $0.52 | $0.46 | $-0.79 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 150.4M | 145.7M | 154.7M | 160.9M | 53.0M | 53.0M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 150.4M | 145.7M | 166.5M | 175.1M | 53.0M | 53.0M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 238 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BHP | $439.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 713 |
| LIN | $215.3B | 31.4× | 19.3× | 6.3× | 3.0% | — | 20.3% | 18.0% | 10.9% | 2.1× | 2,148 |
| SCCO | $157.0B | 36.2× | 20.3× | 11.7× | 17.4% | 60.1% | 32.4% | 39.4% | 24.4% | 0.9× | 791 |
| CX | $147.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 297 |
| TX | $114.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 139 |
| FCX | $101.8B | — | 12.3× | 3.9× | 1.8% | 28.2% | 16.0% | 22.0% | 14.7% | 1.1× | 1,775 |
| AEM | $100.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,066 |
| SHW | $79.6B | 31.3× | — | 3.4× | 2.1% | 48.8% | 10.9% | 55.9% | 17.0% | — | 1,610 |
| ECL | $76.6B | 37.3× | 22.5× | 4.8× | 2.2% | 44.5% | 12.9% | 21.2% | 19.5% | 0.3× | 1,619 |
| B | $73.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 979 |
| WPM | $66.6B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 809 |
| APD | $63.7B | — | 90.0× | 5.3× | -0.5% | 31.4% | -3.3% | -2.6% | -2.6% | 0.1× | 1,702 |
| NUE | $60.1B | 34.7× | — | 1.9× | 5.7% | 11.9% | 5.4% | 8.3% | 8.3% | — | 1,325 |
| VALE | $60.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 537 |
| CRH | $58.0B | 15.7× | 9.3× | 1.6× | 5.3% | 36.1% | 10.0% | 15.6% | 9.2% | 2.2× | 9 |
| MT | $57.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 286 |
| DD | $53.6B | — | — | 7.8× | 1.9% | 34.5% | -11.4% | -5.6% | -5.6% | — | 1,172 |
| AU | $51.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 537 |
| FNV | $51.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 614 |
| NTR | $37.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 718 |
| STLD | $34.5B | 29.8× | 18.7× | 1.9× | 3.6% | 13.2% | 6.5% | 13.2% | 9.0% | 2.1× | 893 |
| KGC | $34.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 630 |
| VMC | $31.9B | 30.1× | 15.2× | 4.0× | 7.1% | 27.4% | 13.6% | 12.6% | 8.4% | 1.8× | 981 |
| MLM | $29.8B | 26.3× | 16.9× | 4.8× | 8.6% | 30.7% | 18.5% | 11.3% | 7.4% | 2.6× | 1,022 |
| PPG | $23.5B | 15.1× | — | 1.5× | 0.2% | 41.3% | 9.9% | 19.8% | 10.3% | — | 1,003 |
| PRM | $4.8B | — | — | 7.3× | 16.4% | 57.5% | -31.6% | -18.2% | -11.4% | -3.6× | 281 |
Peers = companies sharing PRM's sector (Basic Materials) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.