Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 427 of 5,944 reporting institutions (96th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $4.90 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds -4.9%/yr for a decade (off $324M normalized FCF).
The market's -4.9% is more conservative than its 7-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.39B shares · net debt $708M
mean -649.1% · volatility σ 472% · implied rate exceeded in 0/2 yrs
Central path = implied -4.9%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (472%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on $324M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 8 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Modest payoff on reinvested capital. Current ROIC on all capital: -9%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 8 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $1.0B covers the $10M due within a year 104.0× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2024-06-30 (10-K).
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~7.7% on $1.7B of debt.
Cash of $1.0B fully covers short-term debt of $209M.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.49B 100.0% | $2.70B 100.0% | $2.80B 100.0% | $3.58B 100.0% | $4.02B 100.0% | $1.83B 100.0% | $915.0M 100.0% | $435.0M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $1.22B 49.1% | $1.49B 55.3% | $1.88B 67.0% | $2.88B 80.5% | $2.57B 63.8% | $988.2M 54.1% | $531.4M 58.1% | $245.4M 56.4% |
| Gross Profit | $1.27B 50.9% | $1.21B 44.7% | $923.5M 33.0% | $698.4M 19.5% | $1.45B 36.2% | $837.7M 45.9% | $383.6M 41.9% | $189.6M 43.6% |
| Research & Development | $234.2M 9.4% | $304.8M 11.3% | $318.4M 11.4% | $359.5M 10.0% | $247.6M 6.2% | $89.1M 4.9% | $54.8M 6.0% | $23.4M 5.4% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $527.3M 21.2% | $651.0M 24.1% | $798.1M 28.5% | $963.4M 26.9% | $661.8M 16.5% | $351.4M 19.2% | $207.0M 22.6% | $62.4M 14.3% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $1.30B 52.4% | $1.74B 64.3% | $2.12B 75.7% | $3.43B 95.8% | $1.64B 40.8% | $918.4M 50.3% | $585.8M 64.0% | $237.1M 54.5% |
| Operating Income | -$36.2M -1.5% | -$529.0M -19.6% | -$1.20B -42.8% | -$2.73B -76.3% | -$187.8M -4.7% | -$80.7M -4.4% | -$202.3M -22.1% | -$47.5M -10.9% |
| Interest Expense | $134.5M 5.4% | $112.5M 4.2% | $97.1M 3.5% | $43.0M 1.2% | $14.8M 0.4% | $2.0M 0.1% | $1.7M 0.2% | — |
| Interest & Investment Income | $32.7M 1.3% | $35.1M 1.3% | $26.4M 0.9% | $2.3M 0.1% | $7.9M 0.2% | $18.2M 1.0% | $8.7M 1.0% | — |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$79.3M -3.2% | -$23.2M -0.9% | -$60.9M -2.2% | -$74.1M -2.1% | -$10.4M -0.3% | $12.3M 0.7% | $6.7M 0.7% | -$300K -0.1% |
| Pretax Income | -$115.6M -4.6% | -$552.1M -20.4% | -$1.26B -44.9% | -$2.81B -78.4% | -$198.2M -4.9% | -$68.4M -3.7% | -$195.6M -21.4% | -$47.8M -11.0% |
| Income Tax Expense | $3.4M 0.1% | -$200K -0.0% | $3.7M 0.1% | $19.6M 0.5% | -$9.2M -0.2% | $3.3M 0.2% | $100K 0.0% | $100K 0.0% |
| Net Income | -$118.9M -4.8% | -$551.9M -20.4% | -$1.26B -45.1% | -$2.83B -78.9% | -$189.0M -4.7% | -$71.6M -3.9% | -$195.6M -21.4% | -$47.9M -11.0% |
| Per Share | ||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-0.30 | $-1.51 | $-3.64 | $-8.77 | $-0.64 | $-0.32 | $-10.72 | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-0.30 | $-1.51 | $-3.64 | $-8.77 | $-0.64 | $-0.32 | $-10.72 | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 390.0M | 365.5M | 346.7M | 322.4M | 293.9M | 221.0M | 22.9M | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 390.0M | 365.5M | 346.7M | 322.4M | 293.9M | 221.0M | 22.9M | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Nothing notable to watch.
Where each multiple sits in its own 6-yr range · 17th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 6-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 12.0× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 56.4 | 58.1 | 54.1 | 63.8 | 80.5 | 67.0 | 55.3 | 49.1 |
| Gross Profit | 43.6 | 41.9 | 45.9 | 36.2 | 19.5 | 33.0 | 44.7 | 50.9 |
| R&D | 5.4 | 6.0 | 4.9 | 6.2 | 10.0 | 11.4 | 11.3 | 9.4 |
| SG&A | 14.3 | 22.6 | 19.2 | 16.5 | 26.9 | 28.5 | 24.1 | 21.2 |
| Operating Income | -10.9 | -22.1 | -4.4 | -4.7 | -76.3 | -42.8 | -19.6 | -1.5 |
| Income Tax | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | -0.2 | 0.5 | 0.1 | -0.0 | 0.1 |
| Net Income | -11.0 | -21.4 | -3.9 | -4.7 | -78.9 | -45.1 | -20.4 | -4.8 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on PTON: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 490 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN | $2.70T | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.5% | 16.2% | — | 5,764 |
| TSLA | $1.37T | 339.1× | 145.5× | 14.5× | -2.9% | 18.0% | 4.0% | 4.6% | 4.2% | 0.9× | 4,029 |
| TM | $614.2B | 60.0× | 24.8× | 2.6× | 3.8% | 18.4% | 4.4% | 7.9% | 5.9% | 1.7× | 665 |
| PDD | $442.6B | 32.9× | 31.9× | 7.2× | 14.5% | 56.3% | 22.7% | 23.7% | 23.7% | — | 548 |
| HD | $301.3B | 21.3× | 14.3× | 1.8× | 3.2% | 33.3% | 8.6% | 110% | 22.8% | 2.0× | 3,970 |
| BABA | $201.7B | 135.7× | — | 1.4× | 8.1% | 39.8% | 10.1% | 9.8% | 9.8% | — | 1,298 |
| TJX | $140.1B | 26.0× | — | 2.3× | 7.1% | 31.0% | 9.1% | 53.9% | 42.1% | — | 2,608 |
| HTHT | $132.7B | 187.9× | 114.3× | — | — | — | — | 39.7% | 27.3% | 0.7× | 258 |
| SBUX | $109.9B | 59.3× | 26.8× | 3.0× | 2.8% | — | 5.0% | -22.9% | 23.3% | 3.4× | 2,252 |
| LOW | $108.9B | 16.4× | 12.0× | 1.3× | 3.1% | 33.5% | 7.7% | -67.1% | 22.3% | 3.2× | 2,591 |
| ABNB | $101.7B | — | 37.9× | 8.3× | 10.3% | 83.0% | 20.5% | 30.6% | 24.6% | 0.8× | 1,246 |
| MELI | $92.5B | 46.3× | — | 3.2× | 39.1% | 44.5% | 6.9% | 29.6% | 12.5% | — | 1,380 |
| MAR | $88.8B | 35.1× | 20.6× | 3.4× | 4.3% | — | 9.9% | -69.0% | -69.4% | 0.0× | 1,559 |
| LKNCY | $86.3B | 168.2× | 90.8× | 12.3× | 48.9% | — | 7.3% | 23.0% | 23.0% | — | 9 |
| GM | $78.3B | 26.5× | 3.9× | 0.4× | -1.3% | — | 1.5% | 4.4% | 4.4% | — | 1,447 |
| ROST | $74.0B | 34.7× | 22.0× | 3.3× | 7.7% | 27.7% | 9.4% | 34.7% | 27.8% | 0.5× | 1,276 |
| ORLY | $71.5B | 28.6× | 19.5× | 4.0× | 6.4% | 51.6% | 14.3% | -333% | 48.3% | 1.5× | 1,569 |
| HLT | $69.7B | 49.4× | 24.0× | 5.8× | 7.7% | — | 12.1% | -27.0% | -27.0% | — | 1,126 |
| RCL | $67.7B | 16.0× | — | 3.8× | 8.8% | 49.4% | 23.8% | 42.5% | 32.3% | — | 1,114 |
| SE | $62.0B | 40.2× | 24.6× | 2.7× | 36.4% | 44.7% | 6.9% | 12.6% | 12.6% | — | 718 |
| F | $54.2B | — | 4.5× | 0.3× | 1.2% | 6.8% | -4.4% | -22.7% | -22.7% | — | — |
| NKE | $53.9B | 17.3× | — | 1.2× | 0.2% | 42.9% | 6.7% | 20.9% | 13.6% | — | 1,848 |
| EBAY | $50.7B | 26.0× | 18.4× | 4.6× | 7.9% | 71.5% | 18.3% | 45.3% | 38.8% | 0.3× | 1,182 |
| AZO | $47.8B | 19.6× | 13.3× | 2.5× | 2.4% | 52.6% | 13.2% | -73.2% | 46.4% | 2.1× | 1,245 |
| CMG | $44.8B | 29.4× | 19.4× | 3.8× | 5.4% | — | 12.9% | 54.3% | 54.3% | 0.0× | 1,203 |
| PTON | $1.9B | — | 49.0× | 0.8× | -7.8% | 50.9% | -4.8% | 28.7% | -8.9% | 32.7× | 427 |
Peers = companies sharing PTON's sector (Consumer Cyclical) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.