Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional accumulation: ownership increased +1.86% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $19.57 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 16.4%/yr for a decade (off $52M normalized FCF).
The market's 16.4% is more conservative than its 2-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.11B shares · net debt -$289M
mean 71.6% · volatility σ 19% · implied rate exceeded in 2/2 yrs
Central path = implied 16.4%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (19%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
5/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on $79M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 3 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: 3%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 3 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-18
No material risks flagged.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 56.0 | 56.5 | 56.4 |
| R&D | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.9 |
| SG&A | 20.2 | 18.8 | 20.9 |
| Operating Income | 3.9 | 4.9 | 1.0 |
| Income Tax | 1.1 | 1.3 | -0.7 |
| Net Income | 3.0 | 3.8 | 0.6 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on PTRN: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-18
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.50B 100.0% | $1.80B 100.0% | $1.37B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $1.41B 56.4% | $1.01B 56.5% | $765.2M 56.0% |
| Research & Development | $46.3M 1.9% | $18.0M 1.0% | $14.6M 1.1% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $523.1M 20.9% | $338.5M 18.8% | $276.3M 20.2% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $2.48B 99.0% | $1.71B 95.1% | $1.31B 96.1% |
| Operating Income | $25.4M 1.0% | $87.2M 4.9% | $52.8M 3.9% |
| Interest Expense | $231K 0.0% | $98K 0.0% | $33K 0.0% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $7.7M 0.3% | $6.2M 0.3% | $2.9M 0.2% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$946K -0.0% | -$2.0M -0.1% | $707K 0.1% |
| Pretax Income | -$794K -0.0% | $91.2M 5.1% | $56.3M 4.1% |
| Income Tax Expense | -$17.0M -0.7% | $23.4M 1.3% | $15.1M 1.1% |
| Net Income | $16.2M 0.6% | $67.9M 3.8% | $41.3M 3.0% |
| Per Share | |||
| EPS (Basic) | $-1.36 | $0.47 | $0.22 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-1.36 | $0.47 | $0.22 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 115.0M | 90.8M | 90.8M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 115.0M | 90.8M | 90.8M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Ranked against 743 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSM | $11.27T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,121 |
| NVDA | $5.40T | 45.4× | 40.5× | 25.0× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.97T | 45.1× | 34.7× | 11.9× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 68.1% | 0.6× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.67T | 27.5× | 19.4× | 11.1× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 27.7% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.70T | 75.0× | 66.9× | 26.5× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.14T | 133.8× | 63.0× | 30.5× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $912.5B | 211.3× | 215.9× | 26.3× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| INTC | $542.3B | — | 67.3× | 10.3× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $433.7B | 43.0× | 36.4× | 7.7× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| PLTR | $424.8B | 282.0× | 294.0× | 94.9× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| DELL | $370.4B | 65.4× | 34.9× | 3.3× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| LRCX | $365.5B | 69.4× | 58.4× | 19.8× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 37.4% | 0.7× | 2,500 |
| AMAT | $352.5B | 51.3× | 40.5× | 12.4× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| RPAY | $340.5B | — | — | 1101.1× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -28.2% | -1.7× | 142 |
| UMC | $309.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| ARM | $293.3B | 324.3× | 252.8× | 59.6× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| SNDK | $261.6B | — | — | 35.6× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.8% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| SAP | $257.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 794 |
| ANET | $250.5B | 72.5× | 63.3× | 27.8× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 39.0% | 28.4% | 28.4% | — | 1,930 |
| PANW | $242.9B | 227.2× | 151.7× | 26.3× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| TXN | $242.4B | 48.9× | 31.9× | 13.7× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.5% | 1.8× | 2,345 |
| CRM | $221.0B | 30.5× | 23.9× | 5.3× | 9.6% | 77.7% | 18.0% | 12.6% | 10.1% | 1.5× | 2,547 |
| IBM | $215.1B | 20.6× | — | 3.2× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| MRVL | $207.0B | 79.6× | 135.2× | 25.3× | 42.1% | 51.0% | 32.6% | 18.7% | 14.2% | 2.9× | 1,477 |
| QCOM | $190.9B | 35.5× | 14.3× | 4.3× | 13.7% | 55.4% | 12.5% | 26.1% | 15.4% | 1.1× | 2,611 |
| PTRN | $2.3B | — | 46.5× | 0.9× | 39.3% | 43.6% | 0.6% | 2.8% | 2.8% | — | 85 |
Peers = companies sharing PTRN's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.