Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Strong institutional accumulation: ownership increased +3.92% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 743 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSM | $10.83T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,121 |
| NVDA | $5.20T | 43.6× | 39.0× | 24.1× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.91T | 44.6× | 34.3× | 11.8× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 68.1% | 0.6× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.64T | 27.3× | 19.3× | 11.0× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 27.7% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.61T | 71.2× | 63.6× | 25.2× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.04T | 122.1× | 57.5× | 27.8× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $835.4B | 193.4× | 197.6× | 24.1× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| INTC | $504.6B | — | 62.9× | 9.6× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $426.7B | 42.3× | 35.8× | 7.5× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| PLTR | $416.9B | 276.7× | 288.5× | 93.2× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| DELL | $367.3B | 64.9× | 34.6× | 3.2× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| LRCX | $341.6B | 64.9× | 54.5× | 18.5× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 37.4% | 0.7× | 2,500 |
| AMAT | $329.4B | 48.0× | 37.9× | 11.6× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| RPAY | $325.1B | — | — | 1051.3× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -28.2% | -1.7× | 142 |
| UMC | $283.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| SAP | $261.9B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 794 |
| ARM | $259.6B | 287.0× | 223.6× | 52.8× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| PANW | $250.9B | 234.8× | 156.8× | 27.2× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| ANET | $248.2B | 71.8× | 62.7× | 27.6× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 39.0% | 28.4% | 28.4% | — | 1,930 |
| TXN | $236.9B | 47.8× | 31.2× | 13.4× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.5% | 1.8× | 2,345 |
| CRM | $232.8B | 32.1× | 25.2× | 5.6× | 9.6% | 77.7% | 18.0% | 12.6% | 10.1% | 1.5× | 2,547 |
| IBM | $222.5B | 21.3× | — | 3.3× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| SNDK | $221.9B | — | — | 30.2× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.8% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| QCOM | $198.5B | 36.9× | 14.9× | 4.5× | 13.7% | 55.4% | 12.5% | 26.1% | 15.4% | 1.1× | 2,611 |
| MRVL | $194.6B | 74.8× | 127.2× | 23.8× | 42.1% | 51.0% | 32.6% | 18.7% | 14.2% | 2.9× | 1,477 |
| PUBM | $792M | — | 371.4× | 2.8× | -2.9% | 63.6% | -5.1% | -5.5% | -5.5% | — | 148 |
Peers = companies sharing PUBM's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $17.33 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds -1.3%/yr for a decade (off $64M normalized FCF).
The market's -1.3% is more conservative than its 6-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.05B shares · net debt -$146M
mean 6316.0% · volatility σ 15508% · implied rate exceeded in 3/6 yrs
Central path = implied -1.3%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (15508%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $282.9M 100.0% | $291.3M 100.0% | $267.0M 100.0% | $256.4M 100.0% | $226.9M 100.0% | $148.7M 100.0% | $113.9M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $103.1M 36.4% | $101.0M 34.7% | $99.2M 37.2% | $81.5M 31.8% | $58.3M 25.7% | $41.2M 27.7% | $36.1M 31.7% |
| Gross Profit | $179.8M 63.6% | $190.2M 65.3% | $167.8M 62.8% | $174.9M 68.2% | $168.6M 74.3% | $107.6M 72.3% | $77.8M 68.3% |
| Research & Development | $33.8M 12.0% | $33.3M 11.4% | $26.7M 10.0% | $20.8M 8.1% | $15.9M 7.0% | $12.3M 8.2% | $12.5M 10.9% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $60.3M 21.3% | $57.7M 19.8% | $56.2M 21.1% | $44.9M 17.5% | $35.8M 15.8% | $20.3M 13.6% | $20.3M 17.8% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $197.1M 69.7% | $186.3M 64.0% | $165.7M 62.1% | $134.3M 52.4% | $109.8M 48.4% | $75.8M 51.0% | $69.3M 60.8% |
| Operating Income | -$17.3M -6.1% | $3.9M 1.3% | $2.0M 0.8% | $40.5M 15.8% | $58.8M 25.9% | $31.8M 21.3% | $8.5M 7.5% |
| Interest & Investment Income | — | — | — | $2.2M 0.9% | $300K 0.1% | $537K 0.4% | $1.3M 1.1% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $1.3M 0.5% | $13.8M 4.8% | $8.5M 3.2% | -$3.1M -1.2% | $6.0M 2.7% | -$175K -0.1% | $713K 0.6% |
| Pretax Income | -$16.0M -5.6% | $17.8M 6.1% | $10.5M 3.9% | $37.5M 14.6% | $64.8M 28.6% | $31.6M 21.2% | $9.2M 8.1% |
| Income Tax Expense | -$1.5M -0.5% | $5.3M 1.8% | $1.6M 0.6% | $8.8M 3.4% | $8.2M 3.6% | $5.0M 3.3% | $2.6M 2.3% |
| Net Income | -$14.0M -4.9% | $13.0M 4.5% | $9.0M 3.4% | $29.0M 11.3% | $57.0M 25.1% | $26.6M 17.9% | $6.6M 5.8% |
| Per Share | |||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-0.31 | $0.25 | $0.17 | $0.55 | $1.13 | $0.51 | $0.04 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-0.31 | $0.23 | $0.16 | $0.50 | $1.00 | $0.46 | $0.04 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 47.0M | 49.2M | 51.8M | 52.3M | 50.2M | 12.6M | 10.0M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 47.0M | 54.3M | 56.0M | 56.9M | 56.6M | 17.1M | 12.2M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
5/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $46M buybacks = $46M returned on $67M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 7 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A balanced mix of reinvestment and shareholder returns.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -6%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 7 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.”
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Where each multiple sits in its own 6-yr range · 83th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 6-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 188.6× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 31.7 | 27.7 | 25.7 | 31.8 | 37.2 | 34.7 | 36.4 |
| Gross Profit | 68.3 | 72.3 | 74.3 | 68.2 | 62.8 | 65.3 | 63.6 |
| R&D | 10.9 | 8.2 | 7.0 | 8.1 | 10.0 | 11.4 | 12.0 |
| SG&A | 17.8 | 13.6 | 15.8 | 17.5 | 21.1 | 19.8 | 21.3 |
| Operating Income | 7.5 | 21.3 | 25.9 | 15.8 | 0.8 | 1.3 | -6.1 |
| Income Tax | 2.3 | 3.3 | 3.6 | 3.4 | 0.6 | 1.8 | -0.5 |
| Net Income | 5.8 | 17.9 | 25.1 | 11.3 | 3.4 | 4.5 | -4.9 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on PUBM: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.