Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 396 of 5,944 reporting institutions (96th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $178.08 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 10.0%/yr for a decade (off $257M normalized FCF).
The market's 10.0% is more conservative than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.04B shares · net debt -$250M
mean 24.5% · volatility σ 18% · implied rate exceeded in 7/9 yrs
Central path = implied 10.0%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (18%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
7/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $183M buybacks = $183M returned on $304M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 35%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit. Interest last disclosed in FY2020 (no longer broken out).
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $669.1M 100.0% | $607.6M 100.0% | $554.5M 100.0% | $489.7M 100.0% | $411.2M 100.0% | $363.0M 100.0% | $321.6M 100.0% | $278.9M 100.0% | $230.8M 100.0% | $197.9M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $114.8M 17.2% | $111.5M 18.3% | $107.5M 19.4% | $102.8M 21.0% | $89.4M 21.8% | $79.2M 21.8% | $69.5M 21.6% | $66.2M 23.7% | $51.6M 22.3% | $43.1M 21.8% |
| Gross Profit | $554.4M 82.8% | $496.1M 81.7% | $447.0M 80.6% | $386.9M 79.0% | $321.7M 78.2% | $283.7M 78.2% | $252.1M 78.4% | $212.7M 76.3% | $179.2M 77.7% | $154.8M 78.2% |
| Research & Development | $117.3M 17.5% | $111.9M 18.4% | $110.5M 19.9% | $101.2M 20.7% | $81.3M 19.8% | $72.5M 20.0% | $68.2M 21.2% | $53.3M 19.1% | $42.8M 18.5% | $36.6M 18.5% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $71.6M 10.7% | $68.7M 11.3% | $61.7M 11.1% | $58.0M 11.8% | $76.3M 18.6% | $46.6M 12.8% | $40.8M 12.7% | $39.0M 14.0% | $35.3M 15.3% | $29.1M 14.7% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $332.4M 49.7% | $308.9M 50.8% | $283.9M 51.2% | $256.4M 52.4% | $234.1M 56.9% | $187.1M 51.5% | $179.8M 55.9% | $162.3M 58.2% | $142.0M 61.5% | $124.7M 63.0% |
| Operating Income | $222.0M 33.2% | $187.2M 30.8% | $163.1M 29.4% | $130.5M 26.7% | $87.7M 21.3% | $96.7M 26.6% | $72.3M 22.5% | $50.4M 18.1% | $37.2M 16.1% | $30.1M 15.2% |
| Interest Expense | — | — | — | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% | $9K 0.0% | $106K 0.0% | $172K 0.1% | $3K 0.0% | $26K 0.0% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $25.3M 3.8% | $25.8M 4.2% | $16.9M 3.0% | $5.2M 1.1% | $2.3M 0.6% | $5.4M 1.5% | $8.4M 2.6% | $6.1M 2.2% | $2.7M 1.2% | $1.3M 0.7% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $24.9M 3.7% | $22.6M 3.7% | $15.6M 2.8% | $3.2M 0.6% | $1.7M 0.4% | $5.4M 1.5% | $7.7M 2.4% | $5.1M 1.8% | $2.1M 0.9% | $322K 0.2% |
| Pretax Income | $246.8M 36.9% | $209.8M 34.5% | $178.7M 32.2% | $133.7M 27.3% | $89.4M 21.7% | $102.0M 28.1% | $80.0M 24.9% | $55.5M 19.9% | $39.4M 17.1% | $30.4M 15.4% |
| Income Tax Expense | $48.5M 7.2% | $36.1M 5.9% | $27.1M 4.9% | $25.7M 5.2% | $18.4M 4.5% | $10.5M 2.9% | $10.6M 3.3% | -$1.8M -0.7% | -$1.1M -0.5% | $11.2M 5.7% |
| Net Income | $198.3M 29.6% | $173.7M 28.6% | $151.6M 27.3% | $108.0M 22.1% | $71.0M 17.3% | $91.6M 25.2% | $69.3M 21.6% | $57.3M 20.5% | $40.4M 17.5% | $19.2M 9.7% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $5.49 | $4.72 | $4.11 | $2.81 | $1.82 | $2.34 | $1.77 | $1.47 | $1.08 | $0.55 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $5.44 | $4.65 | $4.03 | $2.74 | $1.77 | $2.25 | $1.68 | $1.37 | $1.01 | $0.50 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 36.1M | 36.8M | 36.9M | 38.5M | 39.0M | 39.2M | 39.1M | 38.9M | 37.4M | 35.2M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 36.5M | 37.4M | 37.6M | 39.3M | 40.1M | 40.7M | 41.3M | 41.9M | 40.1M | 38.4M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Nothing notable to watch.
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 43th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 1.8× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 23.7 | 21.6 | 21.8 | 21.8 | 21.0 | 19.4 | 18.3 | 17.2 |
| Gross Profit | 76.3 | 78.4 | 78.2 | 78.2 | 79.0 | 80.6 | 81.7 | 82.8 |
| R&D | 19.1 | 21.2 | 20.0 | 19.8 | 20.7 | 19.9 | 18.4 | 17.5 |
| SG&A | 14.0 | 12.7 | 12.8 | 18.6 | 11.8 | 11.1 | 11.3 | 10.7 |
| Operating Income | 18.1 | 22.5 | 26.6 | 21.3 | 26.7 | 29.4 | 30.8 | 33.2 |
| Income Tax | -0.7 | 3.3 | 2.9 | 4.5 | 5.2 | 4.9 | 5.9 | 7.2 |
| Net Income | 20.5 | 21.6 | 25.2 | 17.3 | 22.1 | 27.3 | 28.6 | 29.6 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on QLYS: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 743 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSM | $10.83T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,121 |
| NVDA | $5.20T | 43.6× | 39.0× | 24.1× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.91T | 44.6× | 34.3× | 11.8× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 68.1% | 0.6× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.64T | 27.3× | 19.3× | 11.0× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 27.7% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.61T | 71.2× | 63.6× | 25.2× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.04T | 122.1× | 57.5× | 27.8× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $835.4B | 193.4× | 197.6× | 24.1× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| INTC | $504.6B | — | 62.9× | 9.6× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $426.7B | 42.3× | 35.8× | 7.5× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| PLTR | $416.9B | 276.7× | 288.5× | 93.2× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| DELL | $367.3B | 64.9× | 34.6× | 3.2× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| LRCX | $341.6B | 64.9× | 54.5× | 18.5× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 37.4% | 0.7× | 2,500 |
| AMAT | $329.4B | 48.0× | 37.9× | 11.6× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| RPAY | $325.1B | — | — | 1051.3× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -28.2% | -1.7× | 142 |
| UMC | $283.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| SAP | $261.9B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 794 |
| ARM | $259.6B | 287.0× | 223.6× | 52.8× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| PANW | $250.9B | 234.8× | 156.8× | 27.2× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| ANET | $248.2B | 71.8× | 62.7× | 27.6× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 39.0% | 28.4% | 28.4% | — | 1,930 |
| TXN | $236.9B | 47.8× | 31.2× | 13.4× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.5% | 1.8× | 2,345 |
| CRM | $232.8B | 32.1× | 25.2× | 5.6× | 9.6% | 77.7% | 18.0% | 12.6% | 10.1% | 1.5× | 2,547 |
| IBM | $222.5B | 21.3× | — | 3.3× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| SNDK | $221.9B | — | — | 30.2× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.8% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| QCOM | $198.5B | 36.9× | 14.9× | 4.5× | 13.7% | 55.4% | 12.5% | 26.1% | 15.4% | 1.1× | 2,611 |
| MRVL | $194.6B | 74.8× | 127.2× | 23.8× | 42.1% | 51.0% | 32.6% | 18.7% | 14.2% | 2.9× | 1,477 |
| QLYS | $6.5B | 33.6× | 26.6× | 9.8× | 10.1% | 82.8% | 29.6% | 35.3% | 35.3% | — | 396 |
Peers = companies sharing QLYS's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.