Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional accumulation: ownership increased +1.40% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $10.59 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 3.5%/yr for a decade (off $10M normalized FCF).
The market's 3.5% is more conservative than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.02B shares · net debt -$30M
mean 13.0% · volatility σ 182% · implied rate exceeded in 3/6 yrs
Central path = implied 3.5%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (182%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $71.5M 100.0% | $61.0M 100.0% | $51.6M 100.0% | $46.1M 100.0% | $40.3M 100.0% | $37.6M 100.0% | $33.0M 100.0% | $34.0M 100.0% | $37.2M 100.0% | $29.5M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $17.2M 24.0% | $15.7M 25.8% | $13.8M 26.7% | $12.7M 27.6% | $11.4M 28.4% | $10.8M 28.6% | $9.9M 30.0% | $8.9M 26.0% | $10.5M 28.2% | $9.0M 30.4% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $4.7M 12.6% | $5.6M 19.0% |
| Cost of Services | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $5.3M 14.3% | $2.9M 9.8% |
| Gross Profit | $54.3M 76.0% | $45.3M 74.2% | $37.8M 73.3% | $33.3M 72.4% | $28.9M 71.6% | $26.8M 71.4% | $23.1M 70.0% | $25.2M 74.0% | $26.7M 71.8% | $20.5M 69.6% |
| Research & Development | $20.2M 28.3% | $18.7M 30.6% | $19.6M 37.9% | $21.5M 46.7% | $20.3M 50.5% | $19.2M 51.1% | $18.6M 56.3% | $15.5M 45.5% | $10.6M 28.4% | $8.0M 27.3% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $6.4M 9.0% | $6.4M 10.5% | $5.1M 9.8% | $4.5M 9.7% | $4.2M 10.4% | $3.8M 10.2% | $3.7M 11.1% | $3.4M 10.0% | $4.2M 11.3% | $4.5M 15.3% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $46.0M 64.3% | $42.2M 69.1% | $38.5M 74.6% | $37.5M 81.3% | $34.4M 85.3% | $31.4M 83.6% | $30.9M 93.7% | $28.7M 84.2% | $24.1M 64.9% | $19.4M 65.8% |
| Operating Income | $8.3M 11.6% | $3.1M 5.1% | -$662K -1.3% | -$4.1M -8.9% | -$5.5M -13.6% | -$4.6M -12.2% | -$7.8M -23.7% | -$3.5M -10.2% | $2.6M 7.0% | $1.1M 3.8% |
| Interest Expense | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $23K 0.1% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $5.0M 7.0% | $4.7M 7.7% | $4.3M 8.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Other Income (Expense), net | — | $4.1M 6.7% | $4.6M 8.8% | $2.0M 4.4% | $354K 0.9% | $810K 2.2% | $1.2M 3.6% | $1.1M 3.3% | $389K 1.0% | $816K 2.8% |
| Pretax Income | $12.6M 17.6% | $7.2M 11.8% | $3.9M 7.5% | -$2.1M -4.6% | -$5.1M -12.8% | -$3.8M -10.0% | -$6.7M -20.2% | -$2.4M -6.9% | $3.0M 8.0% | $1.9M 6.6% |
| Income Tax Expense | $595K 0.8% | $234K 0.4% | $182K 0.4% | $159K 0.3% | $124K 0.3% | $220K 0.6% | $169K 0.5% | $63K 0.2% | $83K 0.2% | $24K 0.1% |
| Net Income | $12.0M 16.8% | $7.0M 11.4% | $3.7M 7.2% | -$2.3M -4.9% | -$5.3M -13.1% | -$4.0M -10.6% | -$6.8M -20.7% | -$2.4M -7.1% | $2.9M 7.8% | $1.9M 6.5% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $0.74 | $0.44 | $0.25 | $-0.16 | $-0.37 | $-0.29 | $-0.50 | $-0.18 | $0.24 | $0.18 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $0.71 | $0.43 | $0.24 | $-0.16 | $-0.37 | $-0.29 | $-0.50 | $-0.18 | $0.23 | $0.18 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 16.3M | 15.7M | 15.1M | 14.5M | 14.1M | — | 13.8M | 13.6M | 12.0M | 10.4M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 16.8M | 16.2M | 15.3M | 14.5M | 14.1M | 13.9M | 13.8M | 13.6M | 12.4M | 10.8M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
7/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on $14M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 11%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit. Interest last disclosed in FY2016 (no longer broken out).
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 9th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 9.8× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 26.0 | 30.0 | 28.6 | 28.4 | 27.6 | 26.7 | 25.8 | 24.0 |
| Gross Profit | 74.0 | 70.0 | 71.4 | 71.6 | 72.4 | 73.3 | 74.2 | 76.0 |
| R&D | 45.5 | 56.3 | 51.1 | 50.5 | 46.7 | 37.9 | 30.6 | 28.3 |
| SG&A | 10.0 | 11.1 | 10.2 | 10.4 | 9.7 | 9.8 | 10.5 | 9.0 |
| Operating Income | -10.2 | -23.7 | -12.2 | -13.6 | -8.9 | -1.3 | 5.1 | 11.6 |
| Income Tax | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Net Income | -7.1 | -20.7 | -10.6 | -13.1 | -4.9 | 7.2 | 11.4 | 16.8 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on RDCM: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 192 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOOG | $4.15T | 31.8× | 27.8× | 10.3× | 15.1% | 59.7% | 32.8% | 31.8% | 28.5% | 0.3× | 4,874 |
| META | $1.72T | 29.1× | 17.1× | 8.6× | 22.2% | 82.0% | 30.1% | 27.8% | 21.9% | 0.6× | 4,839 |
| AMX | $1.40T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 318 |
| CHT | $354.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 206 |
| NFLX | $318.0B | 29.8× | 23.7× | 7.0× | 15.9% | 48.5% | 24.3% | 41.3% | 26.7% | 1.1× | 3,458 |
| CCZ | $239.2B | 12.0× | 6.4× | 1.9× | -0.0% | — | 16.2% | 20.6% | 19.4% | 0.2× | 1 |
| VZ | $204.2B | 11.9× | 4.2× | 1.5× | 2.5% | — | 12.4% | 16.2% | 16.2% | 0.0× | 3,122 |
| DIS | $200.2B | 15.4× | 10.3× | 2.1× | 3.4% | — | 13.1% | 11.3% | 8.2% | 1.8× | 2,883 |
| TMUS | $184.2B | 17.1× | 8.3× | 2.1× | 8.5% | — | 12.4% | 18.6% | 7.6% | 2.7× | 1,648 |
| T | $182.0B | 8.3× | 6.8× | 1.4× | 2.7% | — | 17.5% | 17.4% | 8.1% | 3.2× | 2,848 |
| VEON | $127.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 97 |
| DASH | $83.1B | 91.3× | 53.5× | 6.1× | 27.9% | — | 6.8% | 9.3% | 9.3% | — | 973 |
| WBD | $70.0B | 97.4× | 15.3× | 1.9× | -5.1% | — | 1.9% | 2.0% | 1.1% | 5.1× | 1,259 |
| EA | $52.6B | 59.7× | 36.1× | 7.0× | 0.9% | 79.0% | 11.8% | 13.1% | 13.1% | — | 998 |
| LYV | $39.6B | — | 25.1× | 1.6× | 8.8% | — | 2.0% | 183% | 5.9% | 5.0× | 779 |
| TTWO | $39.0B | — | 424.4× | 5.9× | 18.2% | 57.2% | -4.5% | -8.5% | -4.9% | 26.7× | 1,011 |
| TWLO | $37.5B | 1172.6× | 107.1× | 7.4× | 13.7% | 48.9% | 0.7% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 2.8× | 776 |
| RDDT | $28.5B | 58.3× | 60.1× | 12.9× | 69.4% | 91.2% | 24.1% | 18.1% | 18.1% | — | 765 |
| FOX | $26.9B | 11.9× | — | 1.6× | 16.6% | — | 14.1% | 19.2% | 12.4% | — | 505 |
| OMC | $24.6B | — | 57.5× | 1.4× | 10.1% | 8.5% | -0.3% | -0.5% | -0.3% | 15.8× | 1,083 |
| ROKU | $22.8B | 261.1× | 530.2× | 4.8× | 15.2% | 43.8% | 1.9% | 3.3% | 3.3% | — | 665 |
| FWONA | $21.5B | — | 39.5× | 4.8× | 22.7% | — | 12.4% | 7.2% | 4.3% | 7.9× | 283 |
| NWS | $18.9B | 16.1× | — | 2.2× | 2.4% | — | 14.0% | 13.4% | 11.0% | — | 304 |
| CHTR | $18.0B | 3.7× | 5.3× | 0.3× | -0.6% | — | 9.1% | 31.1% | 4.5% | 4.5× | 760 |
| TKO | $15.3B | 83.8× | 13.8× | 3.2× | -3.1% | — | 4.1% | 5.2% | 2.6% | 2.9× | 616 |
| RDCM | $176M | 14.9× | 16.8× | 2.5× | 17.2% | 76.0% | 16.8% | 10.5% | 10.5% | — | 44 |
Peers = companies sharing RDCM's sector (Communication Services) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.