Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Strong institutional distribution: ownership decreased -13.48% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
This company doesn't have positive free cash flow, so a reverse DCF can't be run.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $48.5M 100.0% | $46.0M 100.0% | $34.9M 100.0% | $19.9M 100.0% | $11.6M 100.0% | $9.2M 100.0% | $5.5M 100.0% | $20.1M 100.0% | $22.1M 100.0% | $12.1M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | — | — | — | — | — | $3.5M 38.3% | $1.7M 30.2% | $10.0M 49.8% | $13.8M 62.3% | $7.0M 57.4% |
| Gross Profit | — | — | — | — | — | $5.7M 61.7% | $3.8M 69.8% | $10.1M 50.2% | $8.3M 37.7% | $5.2M 42.6% |
| Research & Development | $14.6M 30.1% | $18.8M 40.8% | $18.3M 52.3% | $18.6M 93.5% | $8.3M 71.6% | $3.2M 34.5% | $1.4M 26.1% | $131K 0.7% | — | — |
| Selling, General & Admin | $25.2M 52.0% | $30.7M 66.6% | $27.0M 77.4% | $26.6M 133.6% | $23.0M 198.8% | $10.3M 111.3% | $8.3M 151.3% | $18.8M 93.9% | $13.0M 58.6% | $5.3M 43.4% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $56.0M 115.5% | $77.0M 167.3% | $60.5M 173.3% | $94.8M 476.0% | $38.9M 335.7% | $17.6M 190.2% | $11.4M 207.6% | $15.2M 75.8% | — | — |
| Operating Income | -$28.9M -59.6% | -$54.3M -118.0% | -$42.1M -120.6% | -$85.8M -430.6% | -$31.8M -275.0% | -$11.8M -128.3% | -$7.5M -137.8% | -$5.1M -25.5% | -$4.6M -21.0% | -$94K -0.8% |
| Interest Expense | $2.3M 4.7% | $2.6M 5.7% | $3.6M 10.3% | $21K 0.1% | $27K 0.2% | $2.5M 27.1% | $3.9M 71.5% | $492K 2.5% | $213K 1.0% | $165K 1.4% |
| Interest & Investment Income | — | — | — | — | — | $54K 0.6% | $0 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$2.5M -5.2% | -$7.0M -15.3% | -$3.5M -10.1% | $1.3M 6.7% | $769K 6.6% | -$2.1M -22.6% | -$4.8M -88.2% | -$557K -2.8% | -$697K -3.2% | -$165K -1.4% |
| Pretax Income | -$31.4M -64.8% | -$61.4M -133.3% | -$45.7M -130.7% | -$84.4M -423.9% | -$31.1M -268.4% | -$13.9M -151.0% | -$12.4M -226.0% | -$5.7M -28.3% | -$5.3M -24.1% | -$259K -2.1% |
| Income Tax Expense | $42K 0.1% | $45K 0.1% | $32K 0.1% | -$987K -5.0% | -$3.8M -33.0% | $23K 0.2% | $47K 0.9% | $29K 0.1% | -$295K -1.3% | -$220K -1.8% |
| Net Income | -$31.5M -64.9% | -$61.4M -133.4% | -$45.7M -130.8% | -$83.1M -417.2% | -$26.8M -231.4% | -$14.2M -153.6% | -$15.9M -290.4% | -$5.7M -28.4% | -$5.0M -22.8% | -$39K -0.3% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-0.26 | $-0.71 | $-0.72 | $-1.67 | $-0.66 | — | — | $-0.44 | $-0.51 | $-0.01 |
| EPS (Diluted) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $-0.44 | $-0.51 | $-0.01 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 119.7M | 86.7M | 63.2M | 49.8M | 41.2M | — | — | 15.4M | 11.8M | 7.7M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 15.4M | 11.8M | 7.7M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
4/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $189000 buybacks = $189000 returned on -$23M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -54%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $17M covers all $4M of scheduled principal — no refinancing pressure. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2022-12-31 (10-K).
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~15.3% on $15M of debt.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Where each multiple sits in its own 9-yr range · 12th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 9-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 49.8 | 30.2 | 38.3 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Gross Profit | 50.2 | 69.8 | 61.7 | — | — | — | — | — |
| R&D | 0.7 | 26.1 | 34.5 | 71.6 | 93.5 | 52.3 | 40.8 | 30.1 |
| SG&A | 93.9 | 151.3 | 111.3 | 198.8 | 133.6 | 77.4 | 66.6 | 52.0 |
| Operating Income | -25.5 | -137.8 | -128.3 | -275.0 | -430.6 | -120.6 | -118.0 | -59.6 |
| Income Tax | 0.1 | 0.9 | 0.2 | -33.0 | -5.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Net Income | -28.4 | -290.4 | -153.6 | -231.4 | -417.2 | -130.8 | -133.4 | -64.9 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on REKR: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Ranked against 743 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSM | $10.83T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,121 |
| NVDA | $5.20T | 43.6× | 39.0× | 24.1× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.91T | 44.6× | 34.3× | 11.8× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 68.1% | 0.6× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.64T | 27.3× | 19.3× | 11.0× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 27.7% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.61T | 71.2× | 63.6× | 25.2× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.04T | 122.1× | 57.5× | 27.8× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $835.4B | 193.4× | 197.6× | 24.1× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| INTC | $504.6B | — | 62.9× | 9.6× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $426.7B | 42.3× | 35.8× | 7.5× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| PLTR | $416.9B | 276.7× | 288.5× | 93.2× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| DELL | $367.3B | 64.9× | 34.6× | 3.2× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| LRCX | $341.6B | 64.9× | 54.5× | 18.5× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 37.4% | 0.7× | 2,500 |
| AMAT | $329.4B | 48.0× | 37.9× | 11.6× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| RPAY | $325.1B | — | — | 1051.3× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -28.2% | -1.7× | 142 |
| UMC | $283.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| SAP | $261.9B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 794 |
| ARM | $259.6B | 287.0× | 223.6× | 52.8× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| PANW | $250.9B | 234.8× | 156.8× | 27.2× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| ANET | $248.2B | 71.8× | 62.7× | 27.6× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 39.0% | 28.4% | 28.4% | — | 1,930 |
| TXN | $236.9B | 47.8× | 31.2× | 13.4× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.5% | 1.8× | 2,345 |
| CRM | $232.8B | 32.1× | 25.2× | 5.6× | 9.6% | 77.7% | 18.0% | 12.6% | 10.1% | 1.5× | 2,547 |
| IBM | $222.5B | 21.3× | — | 3.3× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| SNDK | $221.9B | — | — | 30.2× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.8% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| QCOM | $198.5B | 36.9× | 14.9× | 4.5× | 13.7% | 55.4% | 12.5% | 26.1% | 15.4% | 1.1× | 2,611 |
| MRVL | $194.6B | 74.8× | 127.2× | 23.8× | 42.1% | 51.0% | 32.6% | 18.7% | 14.2% | 2.9× | 1,477 |
| REKR | $59M | — | — | 1.2× | 5.3% | — | -64.9% | -73.4% | -54.4% | -0.7× | 84 |
Peers = companies sharing REKR's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.