Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional accumulation: ownership increased +1.60% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $27.31 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 1.7%/yr for a decade (off $12M normalized FCF).
The market's 1.7% is more optimistic than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.00B shares · net debt $94M
mean -93.8% · volatility σ 129% · implied rate exceeded in 0/2 yrs
Central path = implied 1.7%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (129%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 32 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
5/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Cash conversion lags reported earnings — watch accruals. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on $12M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: 42%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $17M covers the $2000 due within a year 8479.5× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2015-06-30 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~18.3% on $111M of debt.
Cash of $17M fully covers short-term debt of $1M.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $210.1M 100.0% | $203.0M 100.0% | $233.3M 100.0% | $276.0M 100.0% | $411.7M 100.0% | $669.7M 100.0% | $1.07B 100.0% | $1.24B 100.0% | $1.29B 100.0% | $1.29B 100.0% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | $128.8M 12.0% | $140.6M 11.4% | $126.3M 9.8% | $130.0M 10.1% |
| Cost of Services | — | — | — | — | — | — | $452.8M 42.4% | $530.6M 42.9% | $610.4M 47.2% | $609.0M 47.1% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $46.8M 22.3% | $45.4M 22.4% | $50.8M 21.8% | $65.3M 23.7% | $96.4M 23.4% | $131.0M 19.6% | $177.0M 16.6% | $174.0M 14.1% | $157.3M 12.2% | $157.0M 12.2% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $190.2M 90.5% | $182.1M 89.7% | $224.5M 96.2% | $304.9M 110.5% | $506.3M 123.0% | $815.1M 121.7% | $1.09B 102.1% | $1.24B 100.4% | $1.28B 99.0% | $1.27B 98.2% |
| Operating Income | $19.9M 9.5% | $2.1M 1.1% | $8.8M 3.8% | -$28.9M -10.5% | -$94.7M -23.0% | -$145.3M -21.7% | -$22.1M -2.1% | -$5.1M -0.4% | $12.6M 1.0% | $23.8M 1.8% |
| Interest Expense | $20.3M 9.6% | $25.4M 12.5% | $22.1M 9.5% | $12.9M 4.7% | $13.2M 3.2% | $7.5M 1.1% | $4.8M 0.4% | $10.5M 0.8% | $8.6M 0.7% | $9.2M 0.7% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $1.8M 0.9% | $677K 0.3% | $1.4M 0.6% | -$296K -0.1% | $15.9M 3.9% | $3.4M 0.5% | $1.7M 0.2% | $5.2M 0.4% | $1.5M 0.1% | $3.7M 0.3% |
| Pretax Income | $1.5M 0.7% | $89.9M 44.3% | -$12.0M -5.1% | -$44.4M -16.1% | -$108.6M -26.4% | -$176.8M -26.4% | -$22.3M -2.1% | -$10.2M -0.8% | $5.9M 0.5% | — |
| Income Tax Expense | -$115.5M -55.0% | $869K 0.4% | -$655K -0.3% | $2.0M 0.7% | -$5.4M -1.3% | -$4.6M -0.7% | -$2.1M -0.2% | -$69.8M -5.7% | $9.2M 0.7% | $9.0M 0.7% |
| Net Income | $123.5M 58.8% | $91.1M 44.9% | -$7.4M -3.2% | -$85.9M -31.1% | -$113.3M -27.5% | -$171.4M -25.6% | -$14.2M -1.3% | $6.4M 0.5% | -$18.5M -1.4% | -$11.3M -0.9% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $52.26 | $38.93 | $-3.18 | $-39.40 | $-3.15 | $-4.77 | $-0.34 | $0.14 | $-0.40 | $-0.23 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $46.10 | $38.34 | $-3.18 | $-39.40 | $-3.15 | $-4.77 | $-0.34 | $0.14 | $-0.40 | $-0.23 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 2.4M | 2.3M | 2.3M | 2.2M | 36.0M | 35.9M | 41.8M | 46.5M | 46.4M | 48.5M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 2.7M | 2.4M | 2.3M | 2.2M | 36.0M | 35.9M | 41.8M | 47.0M | 46.4M | 48.5M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Nothing notable to watch.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 16th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 236.8× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SG&A | 14.1 | 16.6 | 19.6 | 23.4 | 23.7 | 21.8 | 22.4 | 22.3 |
| Operating Income | -0.4 | -2.1 | -21.7 | -23.0 | -10.5 | 3.8 | 1.1 | 9.5 |
| Income Tax | -5.7 | -0.2 | -0.7 | -1.3 | 0.7 | -0.3 | 0.4 | -55.0 |
| Net Income | 0.5 | -1.3 | -25.6 | -27.5 | -31.1 | -3.2 | 44.9 | 58.8 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on RGS: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Ranked against 490 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN | $2.65T | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.5% | 16.2% | — | 5,764 |
| TSLA | $1.34T | 331.6× | 142.2× | 14.2× | -2.9% | 18.0% | 4.0% | 4.6% | 4.2% | 0.9× | 4,029 |
| TM | $608.8B | 59.5× | 24.6× | 2.6× | 3.8% | 18.4% | 4.4% | 7.9% | 5.9% | 1.7× | 665 |
| PDD | $448.4B | 33.4× | 32.3× | 7.3× | 14.5% | 56.3% | 22.7% | 23.7% | 23.7% | — | 548 |
| HD | $301.3B | 21.3× | 14.3× | 1.8× | 3.2% | 33.3% | 8.6% | 110% | 22.8% | 2.0× | 3,970 |
| BABA | $199.3B | 134.1× | — | 1.3× | 8.1% | 39.8% | 10.1% | 9.8% | 9.8% | — | 1,298 |
| TJX | $136.0B | 25.2× | — | 2.3× | 7.1% | 31.0% | 9.1% | 53.9% | 42.1% | — | 2,608 |
| HTHT | $131.2B | 185.7× | 113.0× | — | — | — | — | 39.7% | 27.3% | 0.7× | 258 |
| SBUX | $110.7B | 59.7× | 26.9× | 3.0× | 2.8% | — | 5.0% | -22.9% | 23.3% | 3.4× | 2,252 |
| LOW | $108.9B | 16.4× | 12.0× | 1.3× | 3.1% | 33.5% | 7.7% | -67.1% | 22.3% | 3.2× | 2,591 |
| ABNB | $102.7B | — | 38.3× | 8.4× | 10.3% | 83.0% | 20.5% | 30.6% | 24.6% | 0.8× | 1,246 |
| MELI | $93.3B | 46.7× | — | 3.2× | 39.1% | 44.5% | 6.9% | 29.6% | 12.5% | — | 1,380 |
| MAR | $89.1B | 35.2× | 20.7× | 3.4× | 4.3% | — | 9.9% | -69.0% | -69.4% | 0.0× | 1,559 |
| LKNCY | $87.3B | 170.2× | 91.9× | 12.4× | 48.9% | — | 7.3% | 23.0% | 23.0% | — | 9 |
| GM | $76.2B | 25.8× | 3.7× | 0.4× | -1.3% | — | 1.5% | 4.4% | 4.4% | — | 1,447 |
| ROST | $72.5B | 34.0× | 21.6× | 3.2× | 7.7% | 27.7% | 9.4% | 34.7% | 27.8% | 0.5× | 1,276 |
| ORLY | $70.5B | 28.2× | 19.2× | 4.0× | 6.4% | 51.6% | 14.3% | -333% | 48.3% | 1.5× | 1,569 |
| HLT | $70.4B | 49.9× | 24.2× | 5.8× | 7.7% | — | 12.1% | -27.0% | -27.0% | — | 1,126 |
| RCL | $68.8B | 16.3× | — | 3.8× | 8.8% | 49.4% | 23.8% | 42.5% | 32.3% | — | 1,114 |
| SE | $63.4B | 41.1× | 25.1× | 2.8× | 36.4% | 44.7% | 6.9% | 12.6% | 12.6% | — | 718 |
| F | $53.1B | — | 4.4× | 0.3× | 1.2% | 6.8% | -4.4% | -22.7% | -22.7% | — | — |
| NKE | $53.1B | 17.0× | — | 1.1× | 0.2% | 42.9% | 6.7% | 20.9% | 13.6% | — | 1,848 |
| EBAY | $49.0B | 25.1× | 17.8× | 4.4× | 7.9% | 71.5% | 18.3% | 45.3% | 38.8% | 0.3× | 1,182 |
| AZO | $47.8B | 19.7× | 13.3× | 2.5× | 2.4% | 52.6% | 13.2% | -73.2% | 46.4% | 2.1× | 1,245 |
| CMG | $45.0B | 29.5× | 19.4× | 3.8× | 5.4% | — | 12.9% | 54.3% | 54.3% | 0.0× | 1,203 |
| RGS | $67M | 0.6× | 7.1× | 0.3× | 3.5% | — | 58.8% | 66.6% | 41.7% | 4.9× | 31 |
Peers = companies sharing RGS's sector (Consumer Cyclical) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.