Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 362 of 5,944 reporting institutions (95th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $126.82 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 6.9%/yr for a decade (off $252M normalized FCF).
The market's 6.9% is more optimistic than its 8-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.02B shares · net debt $2.4B
mean -18.9% · volatility σ 73% · implied rate exceeded in 3/6 yrs
Central path = implied 6.9%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (73%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on $252M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 5%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~9.5% on $2.4B of debt.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2026 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 2.5× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 60.7 | 58.6 | 53.5 | 50.6 | 49.5 | 54.1 | 55.5 | 55.9 |
| Gross Profit | 39.3 | 41.4 | 46.5 | 49.4 | 50.5 | 45.9 | 44.5 | 44.1 |
| SG&A | 28.9 | 27.7 | 30.1 | 24.7 | 30.4 | 33.8 | 34.3 | 32.8 |
| Operating Income | 10.4 | 13.7 | 16.4 | 24.7 | 20.1 | 12.1 | 10.1 | 11.3 |
| Income Tax | 1.0 | 1.8 | 3.7 | 3.6 | -2.5 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 1.4 |
| Net Income | 5.4 | 8.3 | 9.5 | 18.3 | 14.7 | 4.2 | 2.3 | 3.6 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on RH: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2026
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2026 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.44B 100.0% | $3.18B 100.0% | $3.03B 100.0% | $3.59B 100.0% | $3.76B 100.0% | $2.85B 100.0% | $2.65B 100.0% | $2.51B 100.0% | $2.44B 100.0% | $2.13B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $1.92B 55.9% | $1.77B 55.5% | $1.64B 54.1% | $1.78B 49.5% | $1.90B 50.6% | $1.52B 53.5% | $1.55B 58.6% | $1.52B 60.7% | $1.60B 65.6% | $1.46B 68.2% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $1.59B 65.2% | $1.46B 68.2% |
| Gross Profit | $1.52B 44.1% | $1.41B 44.5% | $1.39B 45.9% | $1.81B 50.5% | $1.86B 49.4% | $1.33B 46.5% | $1.10B 41.4% | $985.6M 39.3% | $839.3M 34.4% | $679.8M 31.8% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $1.13B 32.8% | $1.09B 34.3% | $1.02B 33.8% | $1.09B 30.4% | $928.2M 24.7% | $858.7M 30.1% | $732.2M 27.7% | $723.8M 28.9% | $722.2M 29.6% | $626.8M 29.4% |
| Operating Income | $387.3M 11.3% | $322.6M 10.1% | $366.1M 12.1% | $722.2M 20.1% | $927.2M 24.7% | $466.9M 16.4% | $362.8M 13.7% | $261.7M 10.4% | $117.1M 4.8% | $53.0M 2.5% |
| Interest Expense | $228.2M 6.6% | $234.5M 7.4% | $237.9M 7.9% | $151.7M 4.2% | $66.9M 1.8% | $69.3M 2.4% | $87.2M 3.3% | $67.8M 2.7% | $56.0M 2.3% | $44.5M 2.1% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $2.8M 0.1% | $3.9M 0.1% | $39.6M 1.3% | $38.5M 1.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $5.0M 0.1% | -$3.4M -0.1% | -$1.1M -0.0% | -$30K -0.0% | -$2.8M -0.1% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Pretax Income | $166.9M 4.9% | $77.2M 2.4% | $155.8M 5.1% | $437.3M 12.2% | $822.1M 21.9% | $376.4M 13.2% | $269.2M 10.2% | $161.0M 6.4% | $22.5M 0.9% | $8.6M 0.4% |
| Income Tax Expense | $47.2M 1.4% | $4.8M 0.2% | $28.3M 0.9% | -$91.4M -2.5% | $133.6M 3.6% | $104.6M 3.7% | $48.8M 1.8% | $25.2M 1.0% | $25.1M 1.0% | $3.2M 0.1% |
| Net Income | $124.8M 3.6% | $72.4M 2.3% | $127.6M 4.2% | $528.6M 14.7% | $688.5M 18.3% | $271.8M 9.5% | $220.4M 8.3% | $135.7M 5.4% | -$2.6M -0.1% | $5.4M 0.3% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $6.65 | $3.92 | $6.42 | $22.47 | $32.37 | $13.82 | $11.55 | $6.28 | $-0.10 | $0.13 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $6.31 | $3.62 | $5.91 | $19.90 | $22.13 | $9.96 | $9.07 | $5.12 | $-0.10 | $0.13 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 18.8M | 18.5M | 19.9M | 23.5M | 21.3M | 19.7M | 19.1M | 21.6M | 27.1M | 40.7M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 19.8M | 20.0M | 21.6M | 26.6M | 31.1M | 27.3M | 24.3M | 26.5M | 27.1M | 40.9M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 490 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN | $2.65T | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.5% | 16.2% | — | 5,764 |
| TSLA | $1.34T | 331.6× | 142.2× | 14.2× | -2.9% | 18.0% | 4.0% | 4.6% | 4.2% | 0.9× | 4,029 |
| TM | $608.8B | 59.5× | 24.6× | 2.6× | 3.8% | 18.4% | 4.4% | 7.9% | 5.9% | 1.7× | 665 |
| PDD | $448.4B | 33.4× | 32.3× | 7.3× | 14.5% | 56.3% | 22.7% | 23.7% | 23.7% | — | 548 |
| HD | $301.3B | 21.3× | 14.3× | 1.8× | 3.2% | 33.3% | 8.6% | 110% | 22.8% | 2.0× | 3,970 |
| BABA | $199.3B | 134.1× | — | 1.3× | 8.1% | 39.8% | 10.1% | 9.8% | 9.8% | — | 1,298 |
| TJX | $136.0B | 25.2× | — | 2.3× | 7.1% | 31.0% | 9.1% | 53.9% | 42.1% | — | 2,608 |
| HTHT | $131.2B | 185.7× | 113.0× | — | — | — | — | 39.7% | 27.3% | 0.7× | 258 |
| SBUX | $110.7B | 59.7× | 26.9× | 3.0× | 2.8% | — | 5.0% | -22.9% | 23.3% | 3.4× | 2,252 |
| LOW | $108.9B | 16.4× | 12.0× | 1.3× | 3.1% | 33.5% | 7.7% | -67.1% | 22.3% | 3.2× | 2,591 |
| ABNB | $102.7B | — | 38.3× | 8.4× | 10.3% | 83.0% | 20.5% | 30.6% | 24.6% | 0.8× | 1,246 |
| MELI | $93.3B | 46.7× | — | 3.2× | 39.1% | 44.5% | 6.9% | 29.6% | 12.5% | — | 1,380 |
| MAR | $89.1B | 35.2× | 20.7× | 3.4× | 4.3% | — | 9.9% | -69.0% | -69.4% | 0.0× | 1,559 |
| LKNCY | $87.3B | 170.2× | 91.9× | 12.4× | 48.9% | — | 7.3% | 23.0% | 23.0% | — | 9 |
| GM | $76.2B | 25.8× | 3.7× | 0.4× | -1.3% | — | 1.5% | 4.4% | 4.4% | — | 1,447 |
| ROST | $72.5B | 34.0× | 21.6× | 3.2× | 7.7% | 27.7% | 9.4% | 34.7% | 27.8% | 0.5× | 1,276 |
| ORLY | $70.5B | 28.2× | 19.2× | 4.0× | 6.4% | 51.6% | 14.3% | -333% | 48.3% | 1.5× | 1,569 |
| HLT | $70.4B | 49.9× | 24.2× | 5.8× | 7.7% | — | 12.1% | -27.0% | -27.0% | — | 1,126 |
| RCL | $68.8B | 16.3× | — | 3.8× | 8.8% | 49.4% | 23.8% | 42.5% | 32.3% | — | 1,114 |
| SE | $63.4B | 41.1× | 25.1× | 2.8× | 36.4% | 44.7% | 6.9% | 12.6% | 12.6% | — | 718 |
| F | $53.1B | — | 4.4× | 0.3× | 1.2% | 6.8% | -4.4% | -22.7% | -22.7% | — | — |
| NKE | $53.1B | 17.0× | — | 1.1× | 0.2% | 42.9% | 6.7% | 20.9% | 13.6% | — | 1,848 |
| EBAY | $49.0B | 25.1× | 17.8× | 4.4× | 7.9% | 71.5% | 18.3% | 45.3% | 38.8% | 0.3× | 1,182 |
| AZO | $47.8B | 19.7× | 13.3× | 2.5× | 2.4% | 52.6% | 13.2% | -73.2% | 46.4% | 2.1× | 1,245 |
| CMG | $45.0B | 29.5× | 19.4× | 3.8× | 5.4% | — | 12.9% | 54.3% | 54.3% | 0.0× | 1,203 |
| RH | $2.4B | 20.1× | 10.1× | 0.7× | 8.1% | 44.1% | 3.6% | 206% | 5.1% | 5.1× | 362 |
Peers = companies sharing RH's sector (Consumer Cyclical) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.