Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 326 of 5,944 reporting institutions (95th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $74.78 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 5.1%/yr for a decade (off $474M normalized FCF).
The market's 5.1% is more conservative than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.09B shares · net debt $1.1B
mean 4.2% · volatility σ 137% · implied rate exceeded in 6/8 yrs
Central path = implied 5.1%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (137%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $334M buybacks = $334M returned on $587M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 7%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $133M covers all $35M of scheduled principal — no refinancing pressure. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2013-12-31 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~4.8% on $1.3B of debt.
Cash of $133M is below short-term debt of $624M — relies on refinancing/operations.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.52B 100.0% | $2.40B 100.0% | $2.20B 100.0% | $1.99B 100.0% | $1.59B 100.0% | $1.18B 100.0% | $902.9M 100.0% | $673.6M 100.0% | $503.6M 100.0% | $380.4M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $723.2M 28.8% | $705.5M 29.4% | $664.3M 30.2% | $641.7M 32.3% | $448.4M 28.1% | $323.6M 27.3% | $231.0M 25.6% | $157.1M 23.3% | $121.3M 24.1% | $92.2M 24.2% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $25.0M 5.0% | $15.8M 4.2% |
| Gross Profit | $1.79B 71.2% | $1.69B 70.6% | $1.54B 69.8% | $1.35B 67.7% | $1.15B 71.9% | $860.0M 72.7% | $671.8M 74.4% | $516.5M 76.7% | $382.3M 75.9% | $288.2M 75.8% |
| Research & Development | $317.0M 12.6% | $329.3M 13.7% | $335.9M 15.2% | $362.3M 18.2% | $309.7M 19.4% | $189.5M 16.0% | $136.4M 15.1% | $101.0M 15.0% | $75.1M 14.9% | $65.5M 17.2% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $258.4M 10.3% | $266.4M 11.1% | $333.0M 15.1% | $292.9M 14.7% | $284.3M 17.8% | $200.0M 16.9% | $142.0M 15.7% | $102.8M 15.3% | $72.3M 14.4% | $55.5M 14.6% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $1.67B 66.5% | $1.69B 70.5% | $1.74B 78.9% | $2.00B 100.4% | $1.45B 90.8% | $973.3M 82.2% | $717.5M 79.5% | $532.9M 79.1% | $387.7M 77.0% | $301.1M 79.1% |
| Operating Income | $120.6M 4.8% | $2.7M 0.1% | -$198.8M -9.0% | -$649.5M -32.7% | -$301.8M -18.9% | -$113.2M -9.6% | -$45.7M -5.1% | -$16.4M -2.4% | -$5.3M -1.1% | -$12.9M -3.4% |
| Interest Expense | $60.3M 2.4% | $65.0M 2.7% | $36.0M 1.6% | $4.8M 0.2% | $64.4M 4.0% | $49.3M 4.2% | $20.5M 2.3% | $16.1M 2.4% | $99K 0.0% | $746K 0.2% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$64.3M -2.6% | -$49.9M -2.1% | $42.0M 1.9% | -$224.6M -11.3% | -$71.9M -4.5% | $31.2M 2.6% | -$11.3M -1.2% | -$9.6M -1.4% | $1.4M 0.3% | -$3.1M -0.8% |
| Pretax Income | $56.2M 2.2% | -$47.2M -2.0% | -$156.8M -7.1% | -$874.1M -44.0% | -$373.7M -23.4% | -$82.1M -6.9% | -$56.9M -6.3% | -$26.1M -3.9% | -$3.9M -0.8% | -$16.0M -4.2% |
| Income Tax Expense | $12.8M 0.5% | $11.1M 0.5% | $8.4M 0.4% | $5.1M 0.3% | $2.5M 0.2% | $934K 0.1% | -$3.3M -0.4% | $140K 0.0% | $258K 0.1% | $236K 0.1% |
| Net Income | $43.4M 1.7% | -$58.3M -2.4% | -$165.2M -7.5% | -$879.2M -44.2% | -$376.3M -23.6% | -$83.0M -7.0% | -$53.6M -5.9% | -$26.2M -3.9% | -$4.2M -0.8% | -$16.2M -4.3% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $0.48 | $-0.63 | $-1.74 | $-9.23 | $-4.10 | $-0.94 | $-0.64 | — | — | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | $0.48 | $-0.63 | $-1.74 | $-9.23 | $-4.10 | $-0.94 | $-0.64 | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 89.5M | 92.1M | 94.9M | 95.2M | 91.7M | 88.7M | 83.1M | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 91.2M | 92.1M | 94.9M | 95.2M | 91.7M | 88.7M | 83.1M | — | — | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Where each multiple sits in its own 13-yr range · 50th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 13-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 923.6× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 23.3 | 25.6 | 27.3 | 28.1 | 32.3 | 30.2 | 29.4 | 28.8 |
| Gross Profit | 76.7 | 74.4 | 72.7 | 71.9 | 67.7 | 69.8 | 70.6 | 71.2 |
| R&D | 15.0 | 15.1 | 16.0 | 19.4 | 18.2 | 15.2 | 13.7 | 12.6 |
| SG&A | 15.3 | 15.7 | 16.9 | 17.8 | 14.7 | 15.1 | 11.1 | 10.3 |
| Operating Income | -2.4 | -5.1 | -9.6 | -18.9 | -32.7 | -9.0 | 0.1 | 4.8 |
| Income Tax | 0.0 | -0.4 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Net Income | -3.9 | -5.9 | -7.0 | -23.6 | -44.2 | -7.5 | -2.4 | 1.7 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on RNG: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 743 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSM | $11.16T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,121 |
| NVDA | $5.33T | 44.8× | 40.0× | 24.7× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.98T | 45.2× | 34.8× | 12.0× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 68.1% | 0.6× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.70T | 27.7× | 19.6× | 11.1× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 27.7% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.65T | 72.8× | 65.1× | 25.8× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.10T | 128.8× | 60.7× | 29.3× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $888.5B | 205.7× | 210.2× | 25.6× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| INTC | $543.3B | — | 67.4× | 10.3× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $436.6B | 43.2× | 36.6× | 7.7× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| PLTR | $421.4B | 279.8× | 291.6× | 94.2× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| DELL | $383.6B | 67.8× | 36.1× | 3.4× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| LRCX | $341.7B | 64.9× | 54.5× | 18.5× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 37.4% | 0.7× | 2,500 |
| RPAY | $338.0B | — | — | 1092.8× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -28.2% | -1.7× | 142 |
| AMAT | $331.0B | 48.2× | 38.1× | 11.7× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| UMC | $307.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| ARM | $281.9B | 311.6× | 242.9× | 57.3× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| SAP | $262.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 794 |
| ANET | $250.7B | 72.6× | 63.3× | 27.8× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 39.0% | 28.4% | 28.4% | — | 1,930 |
| PANW | $250.5B | 234.4× | 156.5× | 27.2× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| SNDK | $235.7B | — | — | 32.0× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.8% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| TXN | $234.6B | 47.4× | 30.9× | 13.3× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.5% | 1.8× | 2,345 |
| CRM | $225.6B | 31.1× | 24.4× | 5.4× | 9.6% | 77.7% | 18.0% | 12.6% | 10.1% | 1.5× | 2,547 |
| IBM | $222.8B | 21.3× | — | 3.3× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| MRVL | $204.0B | 78.4× | 133.3× | 24.9× | 42.1% | 51.0% | 32.6% | 18.7% | 14.2% | 2.9× | 1,477 |
| QCOM | $202.7B | 37.7× | 15.2× | 4.6× | 13.7% | 55.4% | 12.5% | 26.1% | 15.4% | 1.1× | 2,611 |
| RNG | $6.7B | 155.8× | 37.6× | 2.7× | 4.8% | 71.2% | 1.7% | -7.4% | 6.5% | 6.0× | 326 |
Peers = companies sharing RNG's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.