Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 715 of 5,944 reporting institutions (98th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $99.18 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 6.3%/yr for a decade (off $707M normalized FCF).
The market's 6.3% is more conservative than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.13B shares · net debt $93M
mean 28.8% · volatility σ 100% · implied rate exceeded in 4/8 yrs
Central path = implied 6.3%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (100%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 40% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $272M dividends + $77M buybacks = $349M returned on $675M FCF.
9 consecutive years of dividend increases · 7%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Insufficient data. Current ROIC on all capital: 18%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Nothing notable to watch.
No material risks flagged.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2026 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Operating leverage needs meaningful revenue change.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 62.5 | 62.0 | 60.6 | 63.7 | 62.1 | 58.9 | 58.6 | 58.6 |
| Gross Profit | 37.5 | 38.0 | 39.4 | 36.3 | 37.9 | 41.1 | 41.4 | 41.4 |
| R&D | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.2 |
| SG&A | 28.7 | 28.1 | 27.3 | 26.7 | 27.0 | 28.8 | 29.2 | 29.1 |
| Income Tax | 1.3 | 1.9 | 2.7 | 1.7 | 2.3 | 2.7 | 1.4 | 2.6 |
| Net Income | 4.8 | 5.5 | 8.2 | 7.3 | 6.6 | 8.0 | 9.3 | 8.4 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on RPM: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2026
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.86B 100.0% | $7.37B 100.0% | $7.34B 100.0% | $7.26B 100.0% | $6.71B 100.0% | $6.11B 100.0% | $5.51B 100.0% | $5.56B 100.0% | $5.32B 100.0% | $4.96B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $4.61B 58.6% | $4.32B 58.6% | $4.32B 58.9% | $4.51B 62.1% | $4.27B 63.7% | $3.70B 60.6% | $3.41B 62.0% | $3.48B 62.5% | $3.31B 62.1% | $2.79B 56.3% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $2.79B 56.3% |
| Gross Profit | $3.26B 41.4% | $3.05B 41.4% | $3.01B 41.1% | $2.75B 37.9% | $2.43B 36.3% | $2.41B 39.4% | $2.09B 38.0% | $2.09B 37.5% | $2.02B 37.9% | $2.17B 43.7% |
| Research & Development | $97.9M 1.2% | $94.7M 1.3% | $92.2M 1.3% | $86.6M 1.2% | $80.5M 1.2% | $77.6M 1.3% | $76.5M 1.4% | $71.6M 1.3% | $69.7M 1.3% | $64.9M 1.3% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $2.29B 29.1% | $2.15B 29.2% | $2.11B 28.8% | $1.96B 27.0% | $1.79B 26.7% | $1.66B 27.3% | $1.55B 28.1% | $1.60B 28.7% | $1.50B 28.2% | $1.64B 33.1% |
| Interest Expense | $111.5M 1.4% | $96.5M 1.3% | $118.0M 1.6% | $119.0M 1.6% | $87.9M 1.3% | $85.4M 1.4% | $101.0M 1.8% | $102.4M 1.8% | $104.5M 2.0% | $97.0M 2.0% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $11.5M 0.1% | $1.6M 0.0% | -$10.2M -0.1% | -$9.8M -0.1% | $11.8M 0.2% | -$13.6M -0.2% | -$12.1M -0.2% | -$4.3M -0.1% | $598K 0.0% | -$1.7M -0.0% |
| Pretax Income | $870.3M 11.1% | $792.8M 10.8% | $787.8M 10.7% | $649.4M 8.9% | $606.8M 9.0% | $668.4M 10.9% | $407.8M 7.4% | $339.8M 6.1% | $417.0M 7.8% | $244.3M 4.9% |
| Income Tax Expense | $207.9M 2.6% | $102.4M 1.4% | $198.4M 2.7% | $169.7M 2.3% | $114.3M 1.7% | $164.9M 2.7% | $102.7M 1.9% | $72.2M 1.3% | $77.8M 1.5% | $59.7M 1.2% |
| Net Income | $661.4M 8.4% | $688.7M 9.3% | $588.4M 8.0% | $478.7M 6.6% | $491.5M 7.3% | $502.6M 8.2% | $304.4M 5.5% | $266.6M 4.8% | $337.8M 6.3% | $181.8M 3.7% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $5.19 | $5.38 | $4.58 | $3.74 | $3.81 | $3.89 | $2.35 | $2.03 | $2.55 | $1.37 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $5.17 | $5.35 | $4.56 | $3.72 | $3.79 | $3.87 | $2.34 | $2.01 | $2.50 | $1.36 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 127.0M | 127.6M | 127.8M | 127.5M | 127.9M | 128.3M | 128.5M | 130.6M | 131.2M | 130.7M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 127.6M | 128.2M | 128.3M | 128.8M | 129.6M | 128.9M | 130.0M | 134.3M | 137.2M | 135.2M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $315M is below the $409M due within a year — relies on refinancing or operating cash flow. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2026-05-31 (10-K).
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.” Effective rate ~27.4% on $408M of debt.
Cash of $315M is below short-term debt of $408M — relies on refinancing/operations.
Mostly short-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 238 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BHP | $439.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 713 |
| LIN | $215.3B | 31.4× | 19.3× | 6.3× | 3.0% | — | 20.3% | 18.0% | 10.9% | 2.1× | 2,148 |
| SCCO | $162.1B | 37.4× | 20.9× | 12.1× | 17.4% | 60.1% | 32.4% | 39.4% | 24.4% | 0.9× | 791 |
| CX | $147.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 297 |
| TX | $116.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 139 |
| FCX | $101.8B | — | 12.3× | 3.9× | 1.8% | 28.2% | 16.0% | 22.0% | 14.7% | 1.1× | 1,775 |
| AEM | $100.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,066 |
| SHW | $79.5B | 31.3× | — | 3.4× | 2.1% | 48.8% | 10.9% | 55.9% | 17.0% | — | 1,610 |
| ECL | $76.6B | 37.3× | 22.5× | 4.8× | 2.2% | 44.5% | 12.9% | 21.2% | 19.5% | 0.3× | 1,619 |
| B | $73.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 979 |
| WPM | $69.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 809 |
| APD | $63.7B | — | 90.0× | 5.3× | -0.5% | 31.4% | -3.3% | -2.6% | -2.6% | 0.1× | 1,702 |
| VALE | $61.6B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 537 |
| NUE | $61.2B | 35.3× | — | 1.9× | 5.7% | 11.9% | 5.4% | 8.3% | 8.3% | — | 1,325 |
| CRH | $58.0B | 15.7× | 9.3× | 1.6× | 5.3% | 36.1% | 10.0% | 15.6% | 9.2% | 2.2× | 9 |
| MT | $57.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 286 |
| DD | $53.6B | — | — | 7.8× | 1.9% | 34.5% | -11.4% | -5.6% | -5.6% | — | 1,172 |
| AU | $51.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 537 |
| FNV | $51.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 614 |
| NTR | $37.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 718 |
| STLD | $35.6B | 30.7× | 19.2× | 2.0× | 3.6% | 13.2% | 6.5% | 13.2% | 9.0% | 2.1× | 893 |
| KGC | $34.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 630 |
| VMC | $31.9B | 30.1× | 15.3× | 4.0× | 7.1% | 27.4% | 13.6% | 12.6% | 8.4% | 1.8× | 981 |
| MLM | $29.8B | 26.3× | 16.9× | 4.8× | 8.6% | 30.7% | 18.5% | 11.3% | 7.4% | 2.6× | 1,022 |
| PPG | $23.6B | 15.2× | — | 1.5× | 0.2% | 41.3% | 9.9% | 19.8% | 10.3% | — | 1,003 |
| RPM | $12.7B | 19.2× | — | 1.6× | 6.7% | 41.4% | 8.4% | 20.0% | 17.8% | — | 715 |
Peers = companies sharing RPM's sector (Basic Materials) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.