Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Insufficient data to determine institutional momentum.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Top 1 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $22.35 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 19.2%/yr for a decade (off $4M normalized FCF).
The market's 19.2% is more optimistic than its 6-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.01B shares · net debt -$6M
mean 22.6% · volatility σ 70% · implied rate exceeded in 3/6 yrs
Central path = implied 19.2%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (70%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
3/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash conversion lags reported earnings — watch accruals. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend exceeds free cash flow (114%) — funded from the balance sheet or debt, a red flag if it persists. Last year: $4M dividends + $0 buybacks = $4M returned on $4M FCF.
9 consecutive years of dividend increases · 12%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 13%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Nothing notable to watch.
No material risks flagged.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 52.9 | 51.9 | 50.0 | 49.6 | 51.7 | 53.1 | 50.2 | 51.6 |
| Gross Profit | 47.1 | 48.1 | 50.0 | 50.4 | 48.3 | 46.9 | 49.8 | 48.4 |
| SG&A | 9.4 | 8.7 | 8.8 | 7.8 | 6.9 | 6.9 | 6.9 | 6.4 |
| Operating Income | 20.9 | 23.4 | 25.2 | 28.7 | 27.2 | 25.3 | 28.9 | 27.7 |
| Income Tax | 8.4 | 8.5 | 3.8 | 19.6 | 3.7 | 5.3 | 12.7 | 8.8 |
| Net Income | 21.3 | 25.5 | 14.2 | 58.5 | 17.2 | 23.8 | 34.7 | 31.6 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on RSKIA: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $22.5M 100.0% | $21.8M 100.0% | $20.0M 100.0% | $20.7M 100.0% | $18.5M 100.0% | $14.8M 100.0% | $14.1M 100.0% | $11.9M 100.0% | $10.9M 100.0% | $11.2M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $11.6M 51.6% | $10.9M 50.2% | $10.6M 53.1% | $10.7M 51.7% | $9.2M 49.6% | $7.4M 50.0% | $7.3M 51.9% | $6.3M 52.9% | $5.2M 47.9% | $5.0M 44.3% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $5.2M 47.9% | $5.0M 44.3% |
| Gross Profit | $10.9M 48.4% | $10.8M 49.8% | $9.4M 46.9% | $10.0M 48.3% | $9.3M 50.4% | $7.4M 50.0% | $6.8M 48.1% | $5.6M 47.1% | $5.7M 52.1% | $6.3M 55.7% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $1.4M 6.4% | $1.5M 6.9% | $1.4M 6.9% | $1.4M 6.9% | $1.4M 7.8% | $1.3M 8.8% | $1.2M 8.7% | $1.1M 9.4% | $914K 8.4% | $853K 7.6% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $4.7M 20.7% | $4.6M 20.9% | $4.3M 21.6% | $4.4M 21.1% | $4.0M 21.7% | $3.7M 24.8% | $3.5M 24.7% | $3.1M 26.2% | $2.9M 26.6% | $2.9M 25.8% |
| Operating Income | $6.2M 27.7% | $6.3M 28.9% | $5.1M 25.3% | $5.6M 27.2% | $5.3M 28.7% | $3.7M 25.2% | $3.3M 23.4% | $2.5M 20.9% | $2.8M 25.5% | $3.4M 29.9% |
| Interest Expense | $6K 0.0% | — | — | — | — | $1K 0.0% | $1K 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $2.9M 12.8% | $4.0M 18.5% | $755K 3.8% | -$1.3M -6.3% | $9.1M 49.4% | -$1.1M -7.2% | $1.5M 10.5% | $1.1M 8.8% | $745K 6.8% | $955K 8.5% |
| Pretax Income | $9.1M 40.4% | $10.3M 47.4% | $5.8M 29.1% | $4.3M 20.9% | $14.4M 78.1% | $2.7M 18.0% | $4.8M 33.9% | $3.5M 29.7% | $3.5M 32.4% | $4.3M 38.4% |
| Income Tax Expense | $2.0M 8.8% | $2.8M 12.7% | $1.1M 5.3% | $775K 3.7% | $3.6M 19.6% | $561K 3.8% | $1.2M 8.5% | $1.0M 8.4% | $1.1M 10.3% | $1.2M 11.0% |
| Net Income | $7.1M 31.6% | $7.6M 34.7% | $4.8M 23.8% | $3.6M 17.2% | $10.8M 58.5% | $2.1M 14.2% | $3.6M 25.5% | $2.5M 21.3% | $2.4M 22.0% | $3.1M 27.5% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $1.46 | $1.54 | $0.96 | $0.72 | $2.19 | $0.42 | $0.73 | $0.51 | $0.48 | $0.61 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $1.45 | $1.53 | $0.96 | $0.72 | $2.18 | $0.42 | $0.72 | $0.51 | $0.48 | $0.61 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 4.9M | 4.9M | 4.9M | 4.9M | 4.9M | 5.0M | 5.0M | 5.0M | 5.0M | 5.0M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 4.9M | 4.9M | 5.0M | 5.0M | 5.0M | 5.0M | 5.0M | 5.0M | 5.0M | 5.0M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 651 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTM | $28.75T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 160 |
| CAT | $364.2B | 41.6× | 29.1× | 5.4× | 4.3% | 33.8% | 13.1% | 41.7% | 15.4% | 2.7× | 3,616 |
| GE | $328.2B | 38.4× | — | 7.2× | 18.5% | — | 19.0% | 46.6% | 22.2% | — | 3,077 |
| RTX | $264.2B | 39.7× | 18.8× | 3.0× | 9.7% | — | 7.6% | 10.3% | 10.3% | 0.0× | 3,277 |
| BA | $204.4B | 81.4× | 41.0× | 2.3× | 34.5% | 4.8% | 2.5% | 41.0% | 3.3% | 10.0× | 2,435 |
| DE | $181.0B | 36.2× | — | 4.0× | -11.7% | — | 11.0% | 19.4% | 12.6% | — | 2,491 |
| ABBNY | $174.3B | 47.1× | 31.1× | 5.4× | 9.5% | 34.8% | 11.9% | 28.5% | 20.4% | 0.9× | 48 |
| UNP | $166.7B | 23.4× | 16.0× | 6.8× | 1.1% | — | 29.1% | 38.7% | 14.2% | 2.6× | 2,648 |
| ETN | $154.3B | 38.1× | — | 5.6× | 10.3% | 37.6% | 14.9% | 21.0% | 13.9% | — | 2,398 |
| HON | $131.9B | 28.2× | 16.2× | 3.5× | 7.8% | 36.9% | 12.6% | 34.0% | 9.8% | 3.6× | 2,694 |
| LMT | $123.0B | 25.0× | 16.1× | 1.6× | 5.6% | 10.2% | 6.7% | 74.6% | 17.7% | 2.5× | 2,807 |
| PH | $117.9B | 33.9× | 26.6× | 5.9× | -0.4% | 36.9% | 17.8% | 25.8% | 16.7% | 1.6× | 1,845 |
| ADP | $108.7B | 25.0× | — | 5.0× | 6.7% | 46.4% | 20.1% | 73.2% | 40.1% | — | 2,179 |
| GD | $97.3B | 23.3× | 17.1× | 1.9× | 10.1% | — | 8.0% | 16.4% | 12.5% | 1.3× | 2,123 |
| TT | $94.0B | 32.5× | 23.2× | 4.4× | 7.5% | — | 13.7% | 34.0% | 22.1% | 1.1× | 1,658 |
| PWR | $92.6B | 91.1× | 46.0× | 3.3× | 20.3% | 15.0% | 3.6% | 11.5% | 10.6% | 0.4× | 1,659 |
| VRT | $91.6B | 70.2× | 43.4× | 8.9× | 27.7% | 36.3% | 13.0% | 33.8% | 19.4% | 1.4× | 1,748 |
| JCI | $91.6B | 27.9× | — | 3.9× | 2.8% | 36.4% | 13.9% | 25.5% | 14.4% | — | 1,487 |
| HWM | $91.5B | 61.4× | 40.3× | 11.1× | 11.1% | — | 18.3% | 28.2% | 17.9% | 1.3× | 1,399 |
| CSX | $89.1B | 31.1× | 14.4× | 6.3× | -3.1% | — | 20.5% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 1,791 |
| MMM | $86.2B | 27.1× | 16.6× | 3.5× | 1.5% | 39.9% | 13.0% | 69.1% | 18.8% | 2.1× | 2,051 |
| WM | $86.2B | 31.9× | 12.1× | 3.4× | 14.2% | 40.4% | 10.7% | 27.1% | 25.3% | 0.1× | 2,262 |
| UPS | $83.9B | 15.1× | 9.4× | 0.9× | -2.6% | — | 6.3% | 34.3% | 13.8% | 2.2× | 2,025 |
| EMR | $82.1B | 36.1× | — | 4.6× | 3.0% | 52.8% | 12.7% | 11.3% | 6.9% | — | 2,112 |
| CTAS | $80.4B | 45.3× | 28.9× | 7.8× | 7.7% | 50.0% | 17.5% | 38.7% | 25.5% | 0.8× | 1,366 |
| RSKIA | $191M | 15.5× | 28.0× | 8.5× | 3.5% | 48.4% | 31.6% | 12.5% | 12.5% | — | 1 |
Peers = companies sharing RSKIA's sector (Industrials) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.