Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 325 of 5,944 reporting institutions (95th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $48.92 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 0.7%/yr for a decade (off $324M normalized FCF).
The market's 0.7% is more conservative than its 7-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.08B shares · net debt $62M
mean 59.1% · volatility σ 272% · implied rate exceeded in 2/4 yrs
Central path = implied 0.7%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (272%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
No trend data available for this metric.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 490 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN | $2.73T | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.5% | 16.2% | — | 5,764 |
| TSLA | $1.37T | 337.3× | 144.7× | 14.4× | -2.9% | 18.0% | 4.0% | 4.6% | 4.2% | 0.9× | 4,029 |
| TM | $606.7B | 59.3× | 24.5× | 2.6× | 3.8% | 18.4% | 4.4% | 7.9% | 5.9% | 1.7× | 665 |
| PDD | $449.2B | 33.4× | 32.4× | 7.3× | 14.5% | 56.3% | 22.7% | 23.7% | 23.7% | — | 548 |
| HD | $298.8B | 21.1× | 14.2× | 1.8× | 3.2% | 33.3% | 8.6% | 110% | 22.8% | 2.0× | 3,970 |
| BABA | $210.4B | 141.6× | — | 1.4× | 8.1% | 39.8% | 10.1% | 9.8% | 9.8% | — | 1,298 |
| TJX | $140.9B | 26.1× | — | 2.3× | 7.1% | 31.0% | 9.1% | 53.9% | 42.1% | — | 2,608 |
| HTHT | $133.4B | 188.9× | 115.0× | — | — | — | — | 39.7% | 27.3% | 0.7× | 258 |
| SBUX | $108.9B | 58.8× | 26.6× | 2.9× | 2.8% | — | 5.0% | -22.9% | 23.3% | 3.4× | 2,252 |
| LOW | $108.0B | 16.2× | 11.9× | 1.3× | 3.1% | 33.5% | 7.7% | -67.1% | 22.3% | 3.2× | 2,591 |
| ABNB | $101.9B | — | 38.0× | 8.3× | 10.3% | 83.0% | 20.5% | 30.6% | 24.6% | 0.8× | 1,246 |
| MELI | $90.6B | 45.4× | — | 3.1× | 39.1% | 44.5% | 6.9% | 29.6% | 12.5% | — | 1,380 |
| MAR | $90.1B | 35.6× | 20.9× | 3.4× | 4.3% | — | 9.9% | -69.0% | -69.4% | 0.0× | 1,559 |
| LKNCY | $89.8B | 175.0× | 94.5× | 12.8× | 48.9% | — | 7.3% | 23.0% | 23.0% | — | 9 |
| GM | $74.3B | 25.1× | 3.6× | 0.4× | -1.3% | — | 1.5% | 4.4% | 4.4% | — | 1,447 |
| ROST | $73.0B | 34.3× | 21.8× | 3.2× | 7.7% | 27.7% | 9.4% | 34.7% | 27.8% | 0.5× | 1,276 |
| ORLY | $71.3B | 28.5× | 19.4× | 4.0× | 6.4% | 51.6% | 14.3% | -333% | 48.3% | 1.5× | 1,569 |
| HLT | $70.5B | 50.0× | 24.2× | 5.8× | 7.7% | — | 12.1% | -27.0% | -27.0% | — | 1,126 |
| RCL | $66.6B | 15.8× | — | 3.7× | 8.8% | 49.4% | 23.8% | 42.5% | 32.3% | — | 1,114 |
| SE | $62.3B | 40.4× | 24.7× | 2.7× | 36.4% | 44.7% | 6.9% | 12.6% | 12.6% | — | 718 |
| NKE | $52.7B | 16.9× | — | 1.1× | 0.2% | 42.9% | 6.7% | 20.9% | 13.6% | — | 1,848 |
| F | $52.6B | — | 4.3× | 0.3× | 1.2% | 6.8% | -4.4% | -22.7% | -22.7% | — | — |
| EBAY | $50.2B | 25.8× | 18.2× | 4.5× | 7.9% | 71.5% | 18.3% | 45.3% | 38.8% | 0.3× | 1,182 |
| AZO | $47.9B | 19.7× | 13.4× | 2.5× | 2.4% | 52.6% | 13.2% | -73.2% | 46.4% | 2.1× | 1,245 |
| CMG | $44.7B | 29.3× | 19.3× | 3.8× | 5.4% | — | 12.9% | 54.3% | 54.3% | 0.0× | 1,203 |
| RUSHA | $3.8B | 15.0× | 6.0× | 0.5× | -4.7% | 19.6% | 3.5% | 12.0% | 10.6% | 0.4× | 325 |
Peers = companies sharing RUSHA's sector (Consumer Cyclical) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-18
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.43B 100.0% | $7.80B 100.0% | $7.93B 100.0% | $7.10B 100.0% | — | $5.13B 100.0% | $4.74B 100.0% | $5.81B 100.0% | $5.51B 100.0% | $4.71B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $5.97B 80.4% | $6.27B 80.4% | $6.33B 79.9% | $5.61B 79.1% | — | $4.03B 78.7% | $3.86B 81.5% | $4.78B 82.3% | $4.53B 82.2% | $3.88B 82.4% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $2.77B 58.7% |
| Gross Profit | $1.46B 19.6% | $1.53B 19.6% | $1.59B 20.1% | $1.49B 20.9% | — | $1.09B 21.3% | $875.5M 18.5% | $1.03B 17.7% | $978.3M 17.8% | $829.9M 17.6% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $996.2M 13.4% | $995.6M 12.8% | $1.02B 12.9% | $927.8M 13.1% | — | $731.3M 14.3% | $665.3M 14.0% | $753.7M 13.0% | $705.2M 12.8% | $631.1M 13.4% |
| Operating Income | $393.8M 5.3% | $468.1M 6.0% | $512.4M 6.5% | $506.1M 7.1% | — | $309.0M 6.0% | $154.6M 3.3% | $216.4M 3.7% | $202.9M 3.7% | $148.7M 3.2% |
| Interest Expense | $48.2M 0.6% | $72.0M 0.9% | $53.7M 0.7% | $19.8M 0.3% | — | $2.4M 0.0% | $9.7M 0.2% | $30.5M 0.5% | $21.1M 0.4% | $13.2M 0.3% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $1.9M 0.0% | $1.2M 0.0% | $777K 0.0% | $639K 0.0% | — | $657K 0.0% | $713K 0.0% | $1.7M 0.0% | $1.4M 0.0% | $891K 0.0% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$1.7M -0.0% | $583K 0.0% | $2.6M 0.0% | $22.3M 0.3% | — | $6.4M 0.1% | $6.1M 0.1% | $1.9M 0.0% | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% |
| Pretax Income | $345.9M 4.7% | $397.8M 5.1% | $462.1M 5.8% | $509.3M 7.2% | — | $313.7M 6.1% | $151.7M 3.2% | $189.5M 3.3% | $183.2M 3.3% | $136.4M 2.9% |
| Income Tax Expense | $79.8M 1.1% | $92.8M 1.2% | $114.0M 1.4% | $117.2M 1.7% | — | $72.3M 1.4% | $36.8M 0.8% | $47.9M 0.8% | $44.1M 0.8% | -$35.7M -0.8% |
| Net Income | $266.0M 3.6% | $305.0M 3.9% | $348.0M 4.4% | $391.8M 5.5% | $392.1M | $241.4M 4.7% | $114.9M 2.4% | $141.6M 2.4% | $139.1M 2.5% | $172.1M 3.7% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $3.37 | $3.85 | $4.28 | $4.71 | — | $2.88 | $2.09 | $2.57 | $2.36 | $4.34 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $3.27 | $3.72 | $4.15 | $4.57 | — | $2.78 | $2.04 | $2.51 | $2.30 | $4.20 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 78.4M | 79.1M | 81.1M | 83.1M | — | 83.8M | 54.9M | 55.0M | 58.8M | 39.6M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 80.7M | 81.8M | 83.7M | 85.7M | — | 86.8M | 56.2M | 56.4M | 60.4M | 41.0M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 13% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $58M dividends + $195M buybacks = $253M returned on $462M FCF.
3 consecutive years of dividend increases · 21%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Modest payoff on reinvested capital. Current ROIC on all capital: 11%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $213M covers the $142M due within a year 1.5× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2020-12-31 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit. Effective rate ~17.5% on $275M of debt.
Cash of $213M fully covers short-term debt of $127000.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-18
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 80th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 3.3× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 82.3 | 81.5 | 78.7 | — | 79.1 | 79.9 | 80.4 | 80.4 |
| Gross Profit | 17.7 | 18.5 | 21.3 | — | 20.9 | 20.1 | 19.6 | 19.6 |
| SG&A | 13.0 | 14.0 | 14.3 | — | 13.1 | 12.9 | 12.8 | 13.4 |
| Operating Income | 3.7 | 3.3 | 6.0 | — | 7.1 | 6.5 | 6.0 | 5.3 |
| Income Tax | 0.8 | 0.8 | 1.4 | — | 1.7 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Net Income | 2.4 | 2.4 | 4.7 | — | 5.5 | 4.4 | 3.9 | 3.6 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on RUSHA: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position